H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Sam Querrey vs Milos Raonic H2H: 3-5

Milos Raonic holds a 5–3 lead over Sam Querrey in their ATP head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Milos Raonic leads 4–2 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on grass. Most recently, Milos Raonic won the 2020 Cincinnati Masters second round 6-4 6-4.

USA Age 38 Right-Handed 198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
3 5
8 main draw meetings
CAN Age 35 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Aug 24, 2020 Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Milos Raonic #30 6-4 6-4 Sam Querrey #45 Match data
Mar 10, 2019* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Milos Raonic #14 7-6(1) 6-4 Sam Querrey #51 Match data
Mar 16, 2018* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 QF Hard Milos Raonic #38 7-5 2-6 6-3 Sam Querrey #21 Match data
Jul 7, 2016* Wimbledon Grand Slam QF Grass Milos Raonic #7 6-4 7-5 5-7 6-4 Sam Querrey #41 Match data
Mar 25, 2013* Miami Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Sam Querrey #20 (w/o) Milos Raonic #16 Match data
Feb 16, 2013* San Jose ATP 250 SF Hard Milos Raonic #13 6-4 6-2 Sam Querrey #20 Match data
Nov 2, 2012* Paris Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Sam Querrey #23 6-3 7-6(1) Milos Raonic #14 Match data
Jun 28, 2012* Wimbledon Grand Slam R64 Grass Sam Querrey #64 6-7(3) 7-6(7) 7-6(8) 6-4 Milos Raonic #22 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Sam Querrey #529 #11 2,595 2,037 372 315 54.1% 0 0 0 2 8 10
Milos Raonic #634 #3 5,450 2,246 369 186 66.5% 0 0 0 1 7 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sam Querrey Milos Raonic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2006 6–11 35.3% #130 1,540 0 0 2009 0–1 0.0% #373 1,535 0 0
19 2007 19–22 46.3% #63 1,636 0 0 2010 3–4 42.9% #156 1,651 0 0
20 2008 28–23 54.9% #39 1,786 0 1 2011 30–18 62.5% #31 1,839 0 1
21 2009 39–22 63.9% #25 1,899 0 2 2012 42–20 67.7% #13 1,987 0 3
22 2010 35–21 62.5% #18 1,872 0 6 2013 41–21 66.1% #11 2,034 0 5
23 2011 12–13 48.0% #93 1,816 0 6 2014 47–20 70.1% #8 2,087 0 6
24 2012 37–24 60.7% #22 2,005 0 7 2015 32–15 68.1% #14 2,047 0 7
25 2013 25–21 54.3% #46 1,877 0 7 2016 52–19 73.2% #3 2,143 0 8
26 2014 26–20 56.5% #35 1,893 0 7 2017 29–14 67.4% #24 2,053 0 8
27 2015 20–24 45.5% #59 1,810 0 7 2018 31–18 63.3% #18 1,952 0 8
28 2016 28–23 54.9% #31 1,798 0 8 2019 23–13 63.9% #31 1,919 0 8
29 2017 35–20 63.6% #13 1,943 0 10 2020 23–10 69.7% #14 1,996 0 8
30 2018 21–22 48.8% #51 1,822 0 10 2021 6–4 60.0% #70 1,964 0 8
31 2019 24–17 58.5% #44 1,898 0 10
32 2020 3–6 33.3% #53 1,817 0 10 2023 4–4 50.0% #317 1,909 0 8
33 2021 10–16 38.5% #108 1,702 0 10 2024 6–5 54.5% #238 1,903 0 8
34 2022 4–10 28.6% #329 1,649 0 10