H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 01:16 UTC
Sam Querrey vs Pablo Cuevas H2H: 1-1
Sam Querrey and Pablo Cuevas are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Sam Querrey leads 1–0 on grass, while Pablo Cuevas leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Pablo Cuevas won the 2016 Cincinnati Masters second round 4-6 7-6(5) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 38
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
URU
Age 40
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 16, 2016* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Pablo Cuevas | 4-6 7-6(5) 6-3 | Sam Querrey | Match data |
| Jun 26, 2015* | Nottingham | ATP 250 | R16 | Grass | Sam Querrey | 7-6(7) 7-6(3) | Pablo Cuevas | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sam Querrey | #529 | #11 | 2,595 | 2,037 | 372 | 315 | 54.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 8 | 10 |
| Pablo Cuevas | #841 | #19 | 1,865 | 1,960 | 211 | 212 | 49.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sam Querrey | Pablo Cuevas | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2006 | 6–11 | 35.3% | #130 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2007 | 19–22 | 46.3% | #63 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2008 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #39 | 1,786 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2009 | 39–22 | 63.9% | #25 | 1,899 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #113 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2010 | 35–21 | 62.5% | #18 | 1,872 | 0 | 6 | 2008 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #142 | 1,631 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2011 | 12–13 | 48.0% | #93 | 1,816 | 0 | 6 | 2009 | 18–15 | 54.5% | #50 | 1,744 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2012 | 37–24 | 60.7% | #22 | 2,005 | 0 | 7 | 2010 | 20–22 | 47.6% | #63 | 1,760 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2013 | 25–21 | 54.3% | #46 | 1,877 | 0 | 7 | 2011 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #142 | 1,743 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2014 | 26–20 | 56.5% | #35 | 1,893 | 0 | 7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2015 | 20–24 | 45.5% | #59 | 1,810 | 0 | 7 | 2013 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #220 | 1,718 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2016 | 28–23 | 54.9% | #31 | 1,798 | 0 | 8 | 2014 | 17–12 | 58.6% | #30 | 1,842 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | 2017 | 35–20 | 63.6% | #13 | 1,943 | 0 | 10 | 2015 | 28–25 | 52.8% | #40 | 1,815 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2018 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #51 | 1,822 | 0 | 10 | 2016 | 33–22 | 60.0% | #22 | 1,818 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | 2019 | 24–17 | 58.5% | #44 | 1,898 | 0 | 10 | 2017 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #32 | 1,788 | 0 | 6 |
| 32 | 2020 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #53 | 1,817 | 0 | 10 | 2018 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #88 | 1,766 | 0 | 6 |
| 33 | 2021 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #108 | 1,702 | 0 | 10 | 2019 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #45 | 1,740 | 0 | 6 |
| 34 | 2022 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #329 | 1,649 | 0 | 10 | 2020 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #67 | 1,691 | 0 | 6 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #97 | 1,651 | 0 | 6 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #269 | 1,654 | 0 | 6 |