H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Santiago Giraldo vs Bjorn Phau H2H: 1-0
Santiago Giraldo holds a 1–0 lead over Bjorn Phau in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Santiago Giraldo leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Santiago Giraldo won the 2010 Chennai third round 6-4 6-7(6) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
COL
Age 38
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
GER
Age 46
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 7, 2010* | Chennai | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Santiago Giraldo | 6-4 6-7(6) 6-3 | Bjorn Phau | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Santiago Giraldo | #1,242 | #28 | 1,230 | 1,929 | 141 | 185 | 43.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Bjorn Phau | #1,098 | #59 | 1,038 | 1,733 | 80 | 138 | 36.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Santiago Giraldo | Bjorn Phau | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #438 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 2007 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #141 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #323 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2008 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #163 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #208 | 1,520 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2009 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #107 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #183 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2010 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #64 | 1,718 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #148 | 1,503 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2011 | 29–26 | 52.7% | #55 | 1,793 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #158 | 1,519 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2012 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #57 | 1,796 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #136 | 1,549 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2013 | 14–24 | 36.8% | #69 | 1,753 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 10–14 | 41.7% | #87 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2014 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #32 | 1,786 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 16–26 | 38.1% | #77 | 1,533 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2015 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #70 | 1,717 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #183 | 1,562 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2016 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #91 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #120 | 1,663 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2017 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #227 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 12–17 | 41.4% | #111 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2018 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #253 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 9–13 | 40.9% | #102 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2019 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #274 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #156 | 1,609 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #75 | 1,656 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #316 | 1,641 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #371 | 1,699 | 0 | 0 |