H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Santiago Giraldo vs Edouard Roger-Vasselin H2H: 1-0
Santiago Giraldo holds a 1–0 lead over Edouard Roger-Vasselin in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Santiago Giraldo leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Santiago Giraldo won the 2012 Winston-Salem second round 6-2 2-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
COL
Age 38
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 42
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 21, 2012* | Winston-Salem | ATP 250 | R64 | Hard | Santiago Giraldo | 6-2 2-6 6-1 | Edouard Roger-Vasselin | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Santiago Giraldo | #1,242 | #28 | 1,230 | 1,929 | 141 | 185 | 43.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Edouard Roger-Vasselin | #806 | #35 | 1,133 | 1,885 | 84 | 125 | 40.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Santiago Giraldo | Edouard Roger-Vasselin | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2007 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #141 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2008 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #163 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #197 | 1,450 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2009 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #107 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2010 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #64 | 1,718 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2011 | 29–26 | 52.7% | #55 | 1,793 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #97 | 1,578 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2012 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #57 | 1,796 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #166 | 1,574 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2013 | 14–24 | 36.8% | #69 | 1,753 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #153 | 1,646 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2014 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #32 | 1,786 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #124 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2015 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #70 | 1,717 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #106 | 1,687 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2016 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #91 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 14–19 | 42.4% | #102 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2017 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #227 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 23–26 | 46.9% | #52 | 1,817 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2018 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #253 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 21–28 | 42.9% | #87 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2019 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #274 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #123 | 1,758 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #293 | 1,678 | 0 | 0 |