H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Santiago Giraldo vs Lukasz Kubot H2H: 0-2
Lukasz Kubot holds a 2–0 lead over Santiago Giraldo in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Lukasz Kubot leads 1–0 on clay and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Lukasz Kubot won the 2011 Stuttgart quarterfinal 7-5 5-7 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
COL
Age 38
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
POL
Right-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 7, 2013 | Shanghai Masters | Masters 1000 | Q2 | Hard | Santiago Giraldo | 7-5 7-6(7) | Lukasz Kubot | Match data |
| Jul 16, 2011* | Stuttgart | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Lukasz Kubot | 7-5 5-7 6-3 | Santiago Giraldo | Match data |
| Jan 21, 2010* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Lukasz Kubot | 6-4 3-6 6-3 6-1 | Santiago Giraldo | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Santiago Giraldo | #1,242 | #28 | 1,230 | 1,929 | 141 | 185 | 43.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Lukasz Kubot | #1,054 | #41 | 977 | 1,870 | 82 | 118 | 41.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Santiago Giraldo | Lukasz Kubot | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2007 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #141 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #219 | 1,514 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #163 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #142 | 1,484 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #107 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #125 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #64 | 1,718 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #222 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 29–26 | 52.7% | #55 | 1,793 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #101 | 1,730 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #57 | 1,796 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 15–24 | 38.5% | #70 | 1,661 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 14–24 | 36.8% | #69 | 1,753 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #57 | 1,818 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #32 | 1,786 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #74 | 1,721 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #70 | 1,717 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #72 | 1,674 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #91 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 5–12 | 29.4% | #170 | 1,673 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #227 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #471 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #253 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #274 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |