H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Santiago Giraldo vs Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo H2H: 2-0
Santiago Giraldo holds a 2–0 lead over Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Santiago Giraldo leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Santiago Giraldo won the 2014 Vina Del Mar third round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
COL
Age 38
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 48
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 6, 2014* | Vina Del Mar | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Santiago Giraldo | 6-4 6-2 | Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo | Match data |
| Feb 27, 2013* | Acapulco | ATP 500 | R32 | Clay | Santiago Giraldo | 4-6 6-4 6-4 | Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Santiago Giraldo | #1,242 | #28 | 1,230 | 1,929 | 141 | 185 | 43.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo | #1,153 | #50 | 826 | 1,704 | 68 | 133 | 33.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Santiago Giraldo | Ruben Ramirez Hidalgo | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | 2007 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #141 | 1,471 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2008 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #163 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 2009 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #107 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 2010 | 17–23 | 42.5% | #64 | 1,718 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2011 | 29–26 | 52.7% | #55 | 1,793 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #154 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2012 | 17–19 | 47.2% | #57 | 1,796 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #141 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2013 | 14–24 | 36.8% | #69 | 1,753 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #80 | 1,477 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2014 | 28–27 | 50.9% | #32 | 1,786 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 7–19 | 26.9% | #130 | 1,448 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2015 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #70 | 1,717 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #120 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2016 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #91 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 25–20 | 55.6% | #57 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2017 | 3–10 | 23.1% | #227 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 9–18 | 33.3% | #133 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2018 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #253 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 1–6 | 14.3% | #121 | 1,579 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2019 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #274 | 1,657 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 4–10 | 28.6% | #156 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #77 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 5–15 | 25.0% | #130 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 3–12 | 20.0% | #91 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #166 | 1,568 | 0 | 0 |
| 36 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #224 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 |