H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Scott Draper vs Javier Sanchez H2H: 0-1
Javier Sanchez holds a 1–0 lead over Scott Draper in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Javier Sanchez leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Javier Sanchez won the 1996 Canada Masters second round 7-6(5) 7-6(5).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
AUS
Age 52
Left-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 58
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 21, 1996* | Canada Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Javier Sanchez | 7-6(5) 7-6(5) | Scott Draper | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scott Draper | #1,110 | #42 | 957 | 1,832 | 107 | 126 | 45.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
| Javier Sanchez | #957 | #23 | 1,256 | 1,847 | 321 | 328 | 49.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Scott Draper | Javier Sanchez | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #373 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1986 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #225 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1987 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #110 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1988 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #55 | 1,703 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1995 | 13–13 | 50.0% | #87 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #51 | 1,759 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1996 | 18–24 | 42.9% | #95 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #70 | 1,691 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 1997 | 23–20 | 53.5% | #58 | 1,719 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 36–28 | 56.2% | #32 | 1,733 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1998 | 23–17 | 57.5% | #51 | 1,791 | 0 | 1 | 1992 | 33–32 | 50.8% | #41 | 1,699 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1999 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #154 | 1,627 | 0 | 1 | 1993 | 39–31 | 55.7% | #34 | 1,766 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2000 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #258 | 1,589 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 25–33 | 43.1% | #42 | 1,585 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2001 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #221 | 1,596 | 0 | 1 | 1995 | 33–32 | 50.8% | #36 | 1,650 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2002 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #137 | 1,608 | 0 | 1 | 1996 | 30–33 | 47.6% | #37 | 1,718 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | 2003 | 13–16 | 44.8% | #103 | 1,686 | 0 | 1 | 1997 | 35–33 | 51.5% | #54 | 1,720 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 8–26 | 23.5% | #168 | 1,506 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | 2005 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #718 | 1,635 | 0 | 1 | 1999 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #281 | 1,492 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #957 | 1,481 | 0 | 4 |