H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Scoville Jenkins vs Kevin Kim H2H: 0-1
Kevin Kim holds a 1–0 lead over Scoville Jenkins in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Kevin Kim leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Kevin Kim won the 2005 Memphis third round 6-4 6-7(5) 7-6(4).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
USA
Age 39
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
USA
Age 47
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 13, 2009* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | Q2 | Hard | Kevin Kim | 6-7(4) 6-2 6-1 | Scoville Jenkins | Match data |
| Feb 17, 2005* | Memphis | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Kevin Kim | 6-4 6-7(5) 7-6(4) | Scoville Jenkins | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Scoville Jenkins | #1,297 | #187 | 415 | 1,632 | 6 | 15 | 28.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Kevin Kim | #1,213 | #63 | 866 | 1,641 | 44 | 97 | 31.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Scoville Jenkins | Kevin Kim | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #768 | 1,498 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1300 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 2005 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #263 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2006 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #359 | 1,500 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 2007 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #273 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #195 | 1,469 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2008 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #211 | 1,564 | 0 | 0 | 2000 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #141 | 1,425 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2009 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #246 | 1,589 | 0 | 0 | 2001 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #184 | 1,392 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #238 | 1,430 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #219 | 1,453 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #94 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 19–25 | 43.2% | #101 | 1,560 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 7–18 | 28.0% | #101 | 1,546 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #178 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #117 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 7–16 | 30.4% | #117 | 1,598 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #245 | 1,581 | 0 | 0 |