H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Sebastian Baez vs David Goffin H2H: 1-1
Sebastian Baez and David Goffin are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, David Goffin leads 1–0 on grass, while Sebastian Baez leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sebastian Baez won the 2025 Cincinnati Open first round 6-1 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Argentina
Age 25
Right-Handed
170 cm / 5'7"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
Belgium
Age 35
Right-Handed
180 cm / 5'11"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 9, 2025* | Cincinnati Open | Masters 1000 | R128 | Hard | Sebastian Baez | 6-1 6-3 | David Goffin | Match data |
| Jun 30, 2022* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | David Goffin | 6-1 6-2 6-4 | Sebastian Baez | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sebastian Baez | #56 | #18 | 2,250 | 1,896 | 117 | 120 | 49.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 5 | 7 |
| David Goffin | #251 | #7 | 3,775 | 2,099 | 325 | 264 | 55.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 5 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sebastian Baez | David Goffin | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | 2021 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #99 | 1,552 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #174 | 1,591 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2022 | 25–27 | 48.1% | #43 | 1,750 | 0 | 1 | 2012 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #46 | 1,789 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2023 | 30–26 | 53.6% | #28 | 1,797 | 0 | 4 | 2013 | 10–21 | 32.3% | #110 | 1,749 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2024 | 28–25 | 52.8% | #27 | 1,712 | 0 | 6 | 2014 | 22–14 | 61.1% | #22 | 1,970 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2025 | 17–24 | 41.5% | #45 | 1,621 | 0 | 7 | 2015 | 34–24 | 58.6% | #16 | 1,984 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2026 | 16–16 | 50.0% | #56 | 1,691 | 0 | 7 | 2016 | 44–24 | 64.7% | #11 | 2,020 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2017 | 53–24 | 68.8% | #7 | 2,061 | 0 | 4 |
| 27 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2018 | 27–16 | 62.8% | #22 | 2,024 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2019 | 36–26 | 58.1% | #11 | 1,986 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2020 | 9–10 | 47.4% | #15 | 1,862 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2021 | 14–15 | 48.3% | #39 | 1,745 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2022 | 23–25 | 47.9% | #53 | 1,759 | 0 | 6 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2023 | 9–12 | 42.9% | #111 | 1,710 | 0 | 6 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2024 | 17–16 | 51.5% | #52 | 1,825 | 0 | 6 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2025 | 11–22 | 33.3% | #119 | 1,695 | 0 | 6 |