H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 14:15 UTC

Sergi Bruguera vs Cedric Pioline H2H: 4-3

Sergi Bruguera holds a 4–3 lead over Cedric Pioline in their ATP head-to-head. Across 7 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on hard courts, while Sergi Bruguera leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Sergi Bruguera won the 1997 Marseille third round 6-1 6-7(9) 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sergi Bruguera
ESP Age 55 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
4 – 3
7 main draw meetings
Cedric Pioline
FRA Age 57 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 13, 1997* Marseille ATP 250 R32 Hard Sergi Bruguera #53 6-1 6-7(9) 6-1 Cedric Pioline #26 Match data
Oct 30, 1996* Paris Masters Masters 1000 R64 Carpet Cedric Pioline #20 6-4 6-3 Sergi Bruguera #78 Match data
Oct 18, 1996* Toulouse ATP 250 R16 Hard Cedric Pioline #17 6-4 6-4 Sergi Bruguera #69 Match data
Aug 15, 1996* New Haven ATP 250 R32 Hard Sergi Bruguera #73 2-6 6-3 6-4 Cedric Pioline #17 Match data
Feb 17, 1996* Marseille ATP 250 QF Hard Cedric Pioline #44 4-6 6-3 6-2 Sergi Bruguera #12 Match data
Apr 26, 1993* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 F Clay Sergi Bruguera #9 7-6(2) 6-0 Cedric Pioline #23 Match data
Sep 19, 1992* Bordeaux ATP 250 SF Clay Sergi Bruguera #20 6-2 6-4 Cedric Pioline #57 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Sergi Bruguera #668 #3 3,007 2,101 414 255 61.9% 2 2 0 0 10 14
Cedric Pioline #750 #5 2,335 1,983 370 301 55.1% 0 1 0 0 4 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sergi Bruguera Cedric Pioline
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1988 0–1 0.0% #333 1,492 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1989 23–13 63.9% #26 1,685 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1990 33–24 57.9% #28 1,785 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1991 49–22 69.0% #11 1,831 0 3 1989 0–3 0.0% #202 1,483 0 0
21 1992 41–19 68.3% #16 1,858 0 6 1990 5–12 29.4% #118 1,484 0 0
22 1993 60–23 72.3% #4 1,915 1 11 1991 21–20 51.2% #51 1,664 0 0
23 1994 60–23 72.3% #4 1,939 2 14 1992 31–27 53.4% #33 1,845 0 0
24 1995 35–19 64.8% #13 1,842 2 14 1993 51–27 65.4% #10 1,936 0 0
25 1996 19–19 50.0% #82 1,756 2 14 1994 29–28 50.9% #51 1,767 0 0
26 1997 49–28 63.6% #8 1,786 2 14 1995 24–27 47.1% #54 1,760 0 0
27 1998 12–24 33.3% #132 1,610 2 14 1996 38–21 64.4% #21 1,805 0 1
28 1999 0–1 0.0% #376 1,595 2 14 1997 37–25 59.7% #20 1,834 0 2
29 2000 17–15 53.1% #85 1,662 2 14 1998 38–26 59.4% #18 1,764 0 2
30 2001 15–21 41.7% #108 1,577 2 14 1999 37–28 56.9% #13 1,795 0 3
31 2002 1–3 25.0% #290 1,553 2 14 2000 32–19 62.7% #16 1,760 0 5
32 — — — — — — — 2001 17–22 43.6% #84 1,657 0 5
33 — — — — — — — 2002 10–16 38.5% #119 1,618 0 5