H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Sergi Bruguera vs David Prinosil H2H: 0-1
David Prinosil holds a 1–0 lead over Sergi Bruguera in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, David Prinosil leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, David Prinosil won the 2001 Australian Open first round 7-5 6-1 1-6 2-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ESP
Age 55
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
GER
Age 53
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 17, 2001* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | David Prinosil | 7-5 6-1 1-6 2-6 6-1 | Sergi Bruguera | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sergi Bruguera | #668 | #3 | 3,007 | 2,101 | 414 | 255 | 61.9% | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 14 |
| David Prinosil | #1,091 | #28 | 1,040 | 1,800 | 165 | 208 | 44.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sergi Bruguera | David Prinosil | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #333 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1989 | 23–13 | 63.9% | #26 | 1,685 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1990 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #28 | 1,785 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 9–9 | 50.0% | #125 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1991 | 49–22 | 69.0% | #11 | 1,831 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #77 | 1,633 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1992 | 41–19 | 68.3% | #16 | 1,858 | 0 | 6 | 1994 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #130 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1993 | 60–23 | 72.3% | #4 | 1,915 | 1 | 11 | 1995 | 19–18 | 51.4% | #50 | 1,708 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 1994 | 60–23 | 72.3% | #4 | 1,939 | 2 | 14 | 1996 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #39 | 1,779 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 1995 | 35–19 | 64.8% | #13 | 1,842 | 2 | 14 | 1997 | 16–26 | 38.1% | #89 | 1,633 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 1996 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #82 | 1,756 | 2 | 14 | 1998 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #78 | 1,622 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 1997 | 49–28 | 63.6% | #8 | 1,786 | 2 | 14 | 1999 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #66 | 1,672 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 1998 | 12–24 | 33.3% | #132 | 1,610 | 2 | 14 | 2000 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #38 | 1,788 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #376 | 1,595 | 2 | 14 | 2001 | 7–22 | 24.1% | #132 | 1,606 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | 2000 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #85 | 1,662 | 2 | 14 | 2002 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #229 | 1,593 | 0 | 3 |
| 30 | 2001 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #108 | 1,577 | 2 | 14 | 2003 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #276 | 1,521 | 0 | 3 |
| 31 | 2002 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #290 | 1,553 | 2 | 14 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1063 | 1,515 | 0 | 3 |