H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Sergi Bruguera vs Eduardo Masso H2H: 0-1

Eduardo Masso holds a 1–0 lead over Sergi Bruguera in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Eduardo Masso leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Eduardo Masso won the 1990 Dutch Open quarterfinal 4-6 7-5 6-0.

ESP Age 55 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
0 1
1 main draw meetings
BEL Age 62 Left-Handed 177 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Eduardo Masso #296 4-6 7-5 6-0 Sergi Bruguera #38 Match data Jul 28, 1990* QF Dutch Open ATP World Series modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Sergi Bruguera #668 #3 3,007 2,099 420 257 62.0% 2 2 0 0 10 14
Eduardo Masso #1,177 #56 568 1,685 41 69 37.3% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sergi Bruguera Eduardo Masso
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1988 0–1 0.0% #333 1,492 0 0
18 1989 23–13 63.9% #26 1,686 0 0
19 1990 33–24 57.9% #28 1,785 0 0
20 1991 49–22 69.0% #11 1,831 0 3
21 1992 42–20 67.7% #16 1,847 0 6
22 1993 60–23 72.3% #4 1,915 1 11 1986 0–4 0.0% #208 1,457 0 0
23 1994 60–23 72.3% #4 1,940 2 14 1987 1–2 33.3% #185 1,472 0 0
24 1995 35–19 64.8% #13 1,849 2 14 1988 13–14 48.1% #87 1,602 0 0
25 1996 24–20 54.5% #82 1,784 2 14 1989 4–10 28.6% #305 1,566 0 0
26 1997 49–28 63.6% #8 1,787 2 14 1990 5–6 45.5% #125 1,593 0 0
27 1998 12–24 33.3% #132 1,612 2 14 1991 15–19 44.1% #99 1,619 0 0
28 1999 0–1 0.0% #376 1,597 2 14 1992 3–14 17.6% #219 1,519 0 0
29 2000 17–15 53.1% #85 1,661 2 14
30 2001 15–21 41.7% #108 1,576 2 14
31 2002 1–3 25.0% #290 1,552 2 14

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Sergi Bruguera Eduardo Masso
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1988 0 1 1 0.0%
18 1989 0 1 1 0.0% 23 11 34 67.6% 0 1 1 0.0%
19 1990 7 7 14 50.0% 21 14 35 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7%
20 1991 7 8 15 46.7% 36 9 45 80.0% 6 5 11 54.5%
21 1992 5 4 9 55.6% 35 10 45 77.8% 2 6 8 25.0%
22 1993 11 7 18 61.1% 41 7 48 85.4% 8 9 17 47.1% 1986 0 3 3 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
23 1994 13 8 21 61.9% 30 5 35 85.7% 3 1 4 75.0% 14 9 23 60.9% 1987 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
24 1995 7 5 12 58.3% 24 9 33 72.7% 4 5 9 44.4% 1988 3 5 8 37.5% 4 4 8 50.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 4 3 7 57.1%
25 1996 14 8 22 63.6% 10 8 18 55.6% 0 4 4 0.0% 1989 3 3 6 50.0% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
26 1997 22 13 35 62.9% 20 8 28 71.4% 7 7 14 50.0% 1990 4 4 8 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
27 1998 4 10 14 28.6% 7 12 19 36.8% 1 2 3 33.3% 1991 4 8 12 33.3% 10 8 18 55.6% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
28 1999 0 1 1 0.0% 1992 0 10 10 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
29 2000 3 2 5 60.0% 14 13 27 51.9%
30 2001 0 5 5 0.0% 14 14 28 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0%
31 2002 1 3 4 25.0%
Career 93 78 171 54.4% 276 125 401 68.8% 4 4 8 50.0% 47 50 97 48.5% 11 17 28 39.3% 18 32 50 36.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 9 16 25 36.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 498/583 of Sergi Bruguera's and 44/51 of Eduardo Masso's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Sergi Bruguera Eduardo Masso
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 1991 65/71 2.6 0.8 64.5% 66.6% 53.9% 59.3% 47.9% 61.7% 43.5% —/—
21 1992 56/62 2.7 1.4 57.8% 70.5% 54.3% 60.9% 49.7% 63.5% 42.1% —/—
22 1993 71/83 3.1 1.5 56.9% 71.4% 55.1% 57.2% 51.1% 64.3% 45.3% —/—
23 1994 70/83 3.9 1.7 59.7% 71.8% 52.5% 61.6% 51.1% 64.2% 44.7% —/—
24 1995 47/54 4.3 1.9 60.4% 71.6% 50.4% 58.4% 48.2% 63.2% 42.2% —/—
25 1996 36/44 5.9 2.1 54.0% 71.9% 50.4% 51.0% 43.3% 61.8% 38.7% —/—
26 1997 62/77 4.8 1.9 58.2% 72.8% 53.3% 57.2% 47.9% 64.3% 41.4% —/—
27 1998 29/36 3.2 2.8 55.9% 67.1% 42.2% 50.8% 38.8% 55.7% 37.1% 1991 28/34 0.6 2.6 67.3% 58.1% 47.4% 48.3% 47.5% 54.2% 40.4%
28 1999 1/1 1.0 2.0 52.4% 57.6% 43.3% 37.5% 33.3% 50.8% 37.3% 1992 16/17 1.1 1.5 76.6% 56.9% 44.8% 47.8% 41.6% 54.1% 39.4%
29 2000 27/32 3.6 1.6 59.4% 64.2% 49.3% 54.8% 40.0% 58.0% 41.1% —/—
30 2001 30/36 5.1 4.9 56.6% 72.7% 45.8% 54.5% 39.6% 60.8% 40.1% —/—
31 2002 4/4 4.0 4.3 56.8% 63.6% 37.5% 44.7% 37.8% 52.8% 34.3% —/—
Career 498/677 3.8 1.9 58.7% 70.3% 51.7% 57.4% 47.1% 62.4% 42.2% 44/110 0.8 2.2 70.7% 57.7% 46.5% 48.1% 45.4% 54.1% 40.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Sergi Bruguera Eduardo Masso
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1988 1492 104.2 0.0% -2.50 -0.13
18 1989 1686 141.1 +68 57.7% +0.59 9–7 (56%) 5–3 (63%) +0.47
19 1990 1786 148.1 -121 +38 58.3% +0.73 6–8 (43%) 6–8 (43%) -0.56
20 1991 1832 154.7 +1.30 +3.58 1.135 52.7% -134 +148 63.7% +0.95 14–7 (67%) 16–6 (73%) +0.19
21 1992 1847 152.5 +2.30 +3.00 1.152 52.6% -171 +176 66.0% +1.05 9–10 (47%) 7–5 (58%) +0.05
22 1993 1915 165.8 +3.31 +6.52 1.268 54.6% -134 +227 66.7% +1.30 15–11 (58%) 13–14 (48%) -2.12 1986 1458 101.2 +37 11.1% -2.67 0–1 0–1 +0.24
23 1994 1940 165.8 +3.27 +5.86 1.246 54.3% -85 +272 -286 67.9% +1.42 14–11 (56%) 17–13 (57%) -1.54 1987 1472 114.7 +65 28.6% -1.29 1–0 0–1 -0.13
24 1995 1849 153.2 +1.69 +3.79 1.147 52.6% -54 +234 62.4% +0.86 9–3 (75%) 10–11 (48%) +0.38 1988 1603 127.2 -10 -71 -28 44.1% -0.81 7–5 (58%) 6–4 (60%) -0.57
25 1996 1785 144.3 +0.17 +1.43 1.014 50.1% -5 +127 52.3% +0.11 9–6 (60%) 14–4 (78%) -1.75 1989 1567 106.0 -3 -69 31.4% -1.89 2–2 (50%) 4–1 (80%) +0.01
26 1997 1788 156.1 +2.65 +3.69 1.160 52.9% -3 +136 60.5% +0.79 14–12 (54%) 18–9 (67%) -1.02 1990 1594 127.8 -26 -11 48.0% -0.32 2–1 (67%) 2–1 (67%) -0.54
27 1998 1612 127.7 -3.37 -0.70 0.839 46.5% +20 +142 38.3% -0.83 4–6 (40%) 5–3 (63%) +0.30 1991 1619 127.8 -3.84 +1.27 0.882 47.4% -71 +55 41.3% -0.61 5–5 (50%) 3–7 (30%) -0.97
28 1999 1597 98.0 +0.03 -2.40 0.758 44.3% 0.0% -3.50 0–1 -0.01 1992 1519 114.2 -3.66 -0.40 0.858 46.8% +31 +9 27.3% -1.34 1–3 (25%) 1–8 (11%) +0.07
29 2000 1661 122.2 -3.09 +1.97 0.979 49.5% -5 +37 48.7% -0.10 8–4 (67%) 6–6 (50%) +0.53
30 2001 1576 134.1 -0.39 +0.87 1.023 50.4% -1 +104 45.9% -0.26 2–10 (17%) 5–5 (50%) +0.27
31 2002 1552 104.9 -1.35 -0.43 0.727 44.4% +94 37.5% -0.75 1–1 1–0 +0.32
Career 2099 157.4 +1.46 +3.59 1.123 52.3% -69 +149 -286 59.7% +0.73 114–96 (54%) 123–88 (58%) 104.5 -0.68 1685 127.2 -3.77 +0.66 0.873 47.2% -19 +7 -28 37.7% -1.01 18–17 (51%) 16–23 (41%) 101.4 -1.73

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.