H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Sergi Bruguera vs Mark Koevermans H2H: 2-4

Mark Koevermans holds a 4–2 lead over Sergi Bruguera in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Mark Koevermans leads 4–2 on clay. Most recently, Mark Koevermans won the 1992 Barcelona Olympics second round 1-6 6-3 6-3 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sergi Bruguera
ESP Age 55 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
2 – 4
6 main draw meetings
Mark Koevermans
NED Age 58 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Mark Koevermans #143 1-6 6-3 6-3 6-2 Sergi Bruguera #20 Match data Aug 2, 1992* R32 Barcelona Olympics Olympics Clay
Mark Koevermans #50 7-5 6-4 Sergi Bruguera #8 Match data Jul 26, 1991* R16 Dutch Open ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay
Mark Koevermans #53 6-4 6-3 Sergi Bruguera #8 Match data May 11, 1991* R16 Hamburg Open Masters 1000 Clay
Sergi Bruguera #28 6-3 6-3 Mark Koevermans #46 Match data Apr 4, 1991* R32 Estoril Open ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay
Mark Koevermans #72 4-6 6-4 6-4 Sergi Bruguera #43 Match data Jun 22, 1990* R16 Genova ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay
Sergi Bruguera #81 6-2 6-4 Mark Koevermans #101 Match data May 21, 1989* QF Italian Open ATP 500 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Sergi Bruguera #668 #3 3,007 2,099 420 257 62.0% 2 2 0 0 10 14
Mark Koevermans #753 #37 712 1,777 66 81 44.9% 0 0 0 0 1 1

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sergi Bruguera Mark Koevermans
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1988 0–1 0.0% #333 1,492 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1989 23–13 63.9% #26 1,686 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 1990 33–24 57.9% #28 1,785 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 1991 49–22 69.0% #11 1,831 0 3 1988 0–1 0.0% #139 1,493 0 0
21 1992 42–20 67.7% #16 1,847 0 6 1989 12–11 52.2% #63 1,634 0 0
22 1993 60–23 72.3% #4 1,915 1 11 1990 26–19 57.8% #48 1,753 0 1
23 1994 60–23 72.3% #4 1,940 2 14 1991 16–25 39.0% #71 1,597 0 1
24 1995 35–19 64.8% #13 1,849 2 14 1992 12–20 37.5% #139 1,545 0 1
25 1996 24–20 54.5% #82 1,784 2 14 1993 0–5 0.0% #412 1,486 0 1
26 1997 49–28 63.6% #8 1,787 2 14 — — — — — — —
27 1998 12–24 33.3% #132 1,612 2 14 — — — — — — —
28 1999 0–1 0.0% #376 1,597 2 14 — — — — — — —
29 2000 17–15 53.1% #85 1,661 2 14 — — — — — — —
30 2001 15–21 41.7% #108 1,576 2 14 — — — — — — —
31 2002 1–3 25.0% #290 1,552 2 14 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Sergi Bruguera Mark Koevermans
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1988 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1989 0 1 1 0.0% 23 11 34 67.6% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1990 7 7 14 50.0% 21 14 35 60.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1991 7 8 15 46.7% 36 9 45 80.0% — — — — 6 5 11 54.5% 1988 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
21 1992 5 4 9 55.6% 35 10 45 77.8% — — — — 2 6 8 25.0% 1989 5 4 9 55.6% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — 4 3 7 57.1%
22 1993 11 7 18 61.1% 41 7 48 85.4% — — — — 8 9 17 47.1% 1990 7 5 12 58.3% 15 9 24 62.5% 3 1 4 75.0% 1 4 5 20.0%
23 1994 13 8 21 61.9% 30 5 35 85.7% 3 1 4 75.0% 14 9 23 60.9% 1991 4 8 12 33.3% 12 12 24 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0%
24 1995 7 5 12 58.3% 24 9 33 72.7% — — — — 4 5 9 44.4% 1992 1 5 6 16.7% 11 13 24 45.8% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0%
25 1996 14 8 22 63.6% 10 8 18 55.6% — — — — 0 4 4 0.0% 1993 — — — — 0 5 5 0.0% — — — — — — — —
26 1997 22 13 35 62.9% 20 8 28 71.4% — — — — 7 7 14 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1998 4 10 14 28.6% 7 12 19 36.8% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1999 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2000 3 2 5 60.0% 14 13 27 51.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2001 0 5 5 0.0% 14 14 28 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2002 — — — — 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 93 78 171 54.4% 276 125 401 68.8% 4 4 8 50.0% 47 50 97 48.5% — 17 22 39 43.6% 41 44 85 48.2% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 12 17 29.4%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 498/583 of Sergi Bruguera's and 68/78 of Mark Koevermans's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Sergi Bruguera Mark Koevermans
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 1991 65/71 2.6 0.8 64.5% 66.6% 53.9% 59.3% 47.9% 61.7% 43.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 1992 56/62 2.7 1.4 57.8% 70.5% 54.3% 60.9% 49.7% 63.5% 42.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 1993 71/83 3.1 1.5 56.9% 71.4% 55.1% 57.2% 51.1% 64.3% 45.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 1994 70/83 3.9 1.7 59.7% 71.8% 52.5% 61.6% 51.1% 64.2% 44.7% 1991 39/41 3.0 2.0 53.9% 68.7% 44.7% 57.3% 41.1% 57.7% 39.6%
24 1995 47/54 4.3 1.9 60.4% 71.6% 50.4% 58.4% 48.2% 63.2% 42.2% 1992 24/32 3.5 1.7 55.8% 68.5% 49.8% 48.5% 39.0% 59.6% 37.8%
25 1996 36/44 5.9 2.1 54.0% 71.9% 50.4% 51.0% 43.3% 61.8% 38.7% 1993 5/5 3.0 2.2 58.2% 56.0% 43.9% 43.0% 36.6% 51.0% 33.8%
26 1997 62/77 4.8 1.9 58.2% 72.8% 53.3% 57.2% 47.9% 64.3% 41.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
27 1998 29/36 3.2 2.8 55.9% 67.1% 42.2% 50.8% 38.8% 55.7% 37.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
28 1999 1/1 1.0 2.0 52.4% 57.6% 43.3% 37.5% 33.3% 50.8% 37.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
29 2000 27/32 3.6 1.6 59.4% 64.2% 49.3% 54.8% 40.0% 58.0% 41.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 2001 30/36 5.1 4.9 56.6% 72.7% 45.8% 54.5% 39.6% 60.8% 40.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
31 2002 4/4 4.0 4.3 56.8% 63.6% 37.5% 44.7% 37.8% 52.8% 34.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 498/677 3.8 1.9 58.7% 70.3% 51.7% 57.4% 47.1% 62.4% 42.2% — 68/147 3.2 1.9 54.9% 67.7% 46.5% 53.1% 40.0% 57.8% 38.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Sergi Bruguera Mark Koevermans
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1988 1492 104.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -2.50 — — — -0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1989 1686 141.1 — — — — — +68 — 57.7% +0.59 9–7 (56%) 5–3 (63%) — +0.47 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1990 1786 148.1 — — — — -121 +38 — 58.3% +0.73 6–8 (43%) 6–8 (43%) — -0.56 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 1991 1832 154.7 +1.30 +3.58 1.135 52.7% -134 +148 — 63.7% +0.95 14–7 (67%) 16–6 (73%) — +0.19 1988 1493 106.4 — — — — — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 1–1 — -0.10
21 1992 1847 152.5 +2.30 +3.00 1.152 52.6% -171 +176 — 66.0% +1.05 9–10 (47%) 7–5 (58%) — +0.05 1989 1634 132.7 — — — — +3 -82 — 50.0% +0.11 2–1 (67%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.70
22 1993 1915 165.8 +3.31 +6.52 1.268 54.6% -134 +227 — 66.7% +1.30 15–11 (58%) 13–14 (48%) — -2.12 1990 1754 136.3 — — — — -104 +4 -109 52.9% +0.28 13–5 (72%) 6–10 (38%) — +1.01
23 1994 1940 165.8 +3.27 +5.86 1.246 54.3% -85 +272 -286 67.9% +1.42 14–11 (56%) 17–13 (57%) — -1.54 1991 1597 132.1 -2.18 +0.19 0.936 48.7% -42 +156 — 43.1% -0.42 3–10 (23%) 3–7 (30%) — +0.74
24 1995 1849 153.2 +1.69 +3.79 1.147 52.6% -54 +234 — 62.4% +0.86 9–3 (75%) 10–11 (48%) — +0.38 1992 1546 118.8 -1.22 -1.57 0.936 48.5% -47 +137 — 40.0% -0.41 4–8 (33%) 1–7 (13%) — +2.50
25 1996 1785 144.3 +0.17 +1.43 1.014 50.1% -5 +127 — 52.3% +0.11 9–6 (60%) 14–4 (78%) — -1.75 1993 1486 101.6 -2.05 -3.43 0.689 42.8% — +104 — 15.4% -2.46 0–2 1–0 — +0.01
26 1997 1788 156.1 +2.65 +3.69 1.160 52.9% -3 +136 — 60.5% +0.79 14–12 (54%) 18–9 (67%) — -1.02 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
27 1998 1612 127.7 -3.37 -0.70 0.839 46.5% +20 +142 — 38.3% -0.83 4–6 (40%) 5–3 (63%) — +0.30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 1999 1597 98.0 +0.03 -2.40 0.758 44.3% — — — 0.0% -3.50 — 0–1 — -0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2000 1661 122.2 -3.09 +1.97 0.979 49.5% -5 +37 — 48.7% -0.10 8–4 (67%) 6–6 (50%) — +0.53 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 2001 1576 134.1 -0.39 +0.87 1.023 50.4% -1 +104 — 45.9% -0.26 2–10 (17%) 5–5 (50%) — +0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
31 2002 1552 104.9 -1.35 -0.43 0.727 44.4% — +94 — 37.5% -0.75 1–1 1–0 — +0.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2099 157.4 +1.46 +3.59 1.123 52.3% -69 +149 -286 59.7% +0.73 114–96 (54%) 123–88 (58%) 104.5 -0.68 — 1777 133.6 -1.83 -0.70 0.915 48.2% -49 +84 -109 45.6% -0.19 22–27 (45%) 14–27 (34%) 93.3 +3.31

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.