H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Sergiy Stakhovsky vs Daniel Brands H2H: 2-0

Sergiy Stakhovsky holds a 2–0 lead over Daniel Brands in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Sergiy Stakhovsky leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sergiy Stakhovsky won the 2014 Queen's Club Championships first round 7-5 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sergiy Stakhovsky
UKR Age 40 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
2 – 0
2 main draw meetings
Daniel Brands
GER Age 39 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Sergiy Stakhovsky #115 7-5 6-1 Daniel Brands #172 Match data Apr 22, 2019 Q1 Q Budapest ATP 250 Clay
Daniel Brands #180 6-4 7-6(9) Sergiy Stakhovsky #136 Match data Feb 4, 2019 Q2 Q Sofia ATP 250 Hard
Sergiy Stakhovsky #93 7-5 6-2 Daniel Brands #130 Match data Jun 11, 2014* R64 Queen's Club Championships ATP 250 Grass
Sergiy Stakhovsky #43 6-2 6-3 6-4 Daniel Brands #102 Match data Jan 19, 2011* R128 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard

2 qualifying meetings shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Sergiy Stakhovsky #678 #31 1,263 1,838 145 196 42.5% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Daniel Brands #1,055 #51 896 1,886 58 93 38.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sergiy Stakhovsky Daniel Brands
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2004 0–1 0.0% #335 1,491 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2005 3–3 50.0% #184 1,527 0 0 2007 1–1 50.0% #220 1,491 0 0
20 2006 1–2 33.3% #195 1,525 0 0 2008 1–4 20.0% #150 1,539 0 0
21 2007 0–2 0.0% #199 1,509 0 0 2009 7–5 58.3% #92 1,645 0 0
22 2008 5–4 55.6% #92 1,615 0 1 2010 9–19 32.1% #104 1,670 0 0
23 2009 14–13 51.9% #60 1,751 0 2 2011 4–11 26.7% #110 1,690 0 0
24 2010 24–24 50.0% #46 1,743 0 4 2012 5–8 38.5% #153 1,688 0 0
25 2011 22–26 45.8% #62 1,707 0 4 2013 23–23 50.0% #54 1,809 0 0
26 2012 13–27 32.5% #103 1,737 0 4 2014 2–11 15.4% #329 1,713 0 0
27 2013 10–15 40.0% #98 1,678 0 4 2015 2–1 66.7% #159 1,729 0 0
28 2014 15–19 44.1% #58 1,685 0 4 2016 2–4 33.3% #168 1,660 0 0
29 2015 20–25 44.4% #62 1,715 0 4 2017 1–4 20.0% #320 1,664 0 0
30 2016 6–13 31.6% #109 1,693 0 4 2018 0–1 0.0% #182 1,616 0 0
31 2017 6–8 42.9% #122 1,728 0 4 2019 1–1 50.0% #465 1,605 0 0
32 2018 2–5 28.6% #134 1,650 0 4 — — — — — — —
33 2019 3–6 33.3% #150 1,576 0 4 — — — — — — —
34 2020 0–1 0.0% #202 1,568 0 4 — — — — — — —
35 2021 1–2 33.3% #220 1,530 0 4 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Sergiy Stakhovsky Daniel Brands
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2004 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2005 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 2007 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
20 2006 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 2008 — — — — 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — —
21 2007 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1 1 2 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
22 2008 5 2 7 71.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2010 4 12 16 25.0% 1 5 6 16.7% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
23 2009 12 8 20 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2011 4 5 9 44.4% 0 5 5 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
24 2010 16 16 32 50.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 2012 2 4 6 33.3% 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — —
25 2011 12 14 26 46.2% 9 9 18 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2013 11 12 23 47.8% 10 8 18 55.6% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — —
26 2012 9 17 26 34.6% 3 7 10 30.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2014 2 9 11 18.2% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
27 2013 5 7 12 41.7% 2 6 8 25.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2015 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2014 7 13 20 35.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 2016 2 3 5 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
29 2015 15 16 31 48.4% 3 5 8 37.5% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 2017 1 1 2 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
30 2016 3 9 12 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2018 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 2017 3 3 6 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2019 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2018 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2019 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2020 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2021 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 90 116 206 43.7% 27 48 75 36.0% 24 28 52 46.2% 4 4 8 50.0% — 30 49 79 38.0% 21 34 55 38.2% 7 10 17 41.2% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 340/341 of Sergiy Stakhovsky's and 151/151 of Daniel Brands's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Sergiy Stakhovsky Daniel Brands
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2004 1/1 3.0 0.0 75.0% 52.8% 33.3% 37.5% 0.0% 47.9% 26.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2005 6/6 7.8 2.3 68.1% 69.1% 51.4% 59.4% 48.7% 62.5% 30.3% 2007 2/2 7.5 2.0 64.3% 87.8% 59.9% 100.0% 16.7% 77.8% 23.5%
20 2006 3/3 8.7 3.0 63.9% 69.3% 44.4% 60.4% 28.3% 60.4% 28.8% 2008 5/5 8.0 4.4 61.7% 75.9% 40.5% 48.6% 34.2% 63.2% 30.6%
21 2007 2/2 3.5 2.5 56.3% 61.7% 48.8% 50.0% 25.0% 56.7% 30.6% 2009 12/12 8.3 3.3 67.9% 76.6% 51.4% 69.8% 37.8% 68.6% 34.8%
22 2008 9/9 4.9 2.1 64.2% 72.7% 48.9% 67.9% 38.9% 64.6% 31.6% 2010 28/28 9.3 3.0 64.5% 69.9% 53.9% 57.0% 31.5% 63.9% 29.5%
23 2009 27/27 6.5 2.3 63.7% 71.9% 48.8% 60.8% 43.0% 63.6% 35.5% 2011 15/15 7.0 3.0 68.7% 68.6% 47.4% 57.3% 31.0% 61.7% 28.0%
24 2010 48/48 6.8 2.5 63.4% 71.3% 46.5% 57.4% 34.7% 62.4% 35.6% 2012 13/13 11.1 3.8 63.0% 76.4% 48.5% 49.4% 35.6% 66.2% 31.8%
25 2011 48/48 5.5 1.9 62.0% 70.0% 50.3% 53.4% 40.4% 62.5% 36.8% 2013 46/46 8.5 2.2 66.8% 72.9% 53.0% 57.6% 35.3% 66.2% 33.4%
26 2012 39/40 6.4 3.1 59.5% 71.4% 52.8% 63.8% 36.1% 63.8% 34.7% 2014 13/13 9.2 1.8 69.7% 68.9% 50.3% 62.1% 22.8% 62.9% 29.5%
27 2013 25/25 6.4 2.7 63.1% 70.1% 51.1% 55.3% 37.2% 62.9% 35.6% 2015 3/3 7.3 3.3 54.4% 75.4% 62.8% 43.8% 27.8% 71.2% 37.0%
28 2014 34/34 6.3 3.4 64.2% 72.9% 47.6% 62.6% 43.5% 63.8% 34.9% 2016 6/6 12.3 5.0 64.1% 72.7% 51.2% 59.5% 53.3% 64.7% 32.0%
29 2015 45/45 6.5 2.4 61.9% 71.3% 51.1% 61.8% 35.4% 63.6% 35.1% 2017 5/5 7.0 5.2 64.9% 70.4% 41.0% 62.4% 23.2% 59.4% 29.4%
30 2016 19/19 6.8 4.1 56.6% 71.9% 48.9% 53.3% 39.4% 62.1% 32.7% 2018 1/1 13.0 4.0 71.7% 70.4% 64.3% 66.7% 0.0% 68.7% 28.6%
31 2017 14/14 9.4 2.5 62.2% 75.4% 51.6% 57.0% 39.5% 66.3% 32.9% 2019 2/2 8.0 3.0 66.9% 67.0% 55.3% 66.7% 43.8% 63.0% 35.5%
32 2018 7/7 8.9 3.3 61.6% 69.4% 46.8% 52.2% 21.1% 60.6% 32.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2019 9/9 9.1 2.7 63.5% 71.2% 49.6% 65.1% 39.6% 63.1% 30.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2020 1/1 4.0 3.0 67.1% 58.8% 48.0% 66.7% 100.0% 55.3% 32.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2021 3/3 9.0 4.3 57.2% 76.8% 51.5% 65.6% 56.1% 66.0% 29.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 340/341 6.6 2.7 62.2% 71.3% 49.6% 59.0% 38.3% 63.1% 34.7% — 151/151 8.8 3.0 66.0% 72.3% 51.4% 58.5% 33.1% 65.1% 31.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Sergiy Stakhovsky Daniel Brands
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2004 1492 96.9 +1.37 -0.87 0.503 37.8% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.01 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2005 1528 104.8 -1.62 -2.88 0.808 46.3% +15 — — 46.7% -0.53 2–1 (67%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.25 2007 1492 106.0 -2.82 -3.49 1.057 51.7% — — — 50.0% +0.50 — 1–2 (33%) — +0.05
20 2006 1525 115.1 +0.53 -0.16 0.727 45.0% -1 — — 37.5% -1.25 1–1 1–0 — -0.41 2008 1540 111.5 -1.86 -1.37 0.830 46.7% — +37 — 25.0% -1.50 0–1 — — +0.09
21 2007 1509 105.4 -2.12 -0.77 0.706 43.5% — — — 0.0% -2.75 — — — +0.11 2009 1645 119.5 +2.51 -1.77 1.108 51.4% — +44 — 53.3% +0.30 3–3 (50%) 4–3 (57%) — +0.22
22 2008 1615 119.8 -0.38 -0.29 0.891 48.7% +20 — — 52.6% -0.16 3–0 (100%) 2–0 — -0.41 2010 1671 129.6 +0.41 -4.53 0.817 46.9% -109 -45 +44 34.3% -1.14 3–4 (43%) 9–9 (50%) — -1.34
23 2009 1751 134.9 -0.48 -0.33 0.976 50.0% +28 -170 -104 51.5% -0.01 7–4 (64%) 6–3 (67%) — +1.40 2011 1691 120.3 -1.58 -5.51 0.732 45.6% -31 -86 — 27.8% -1.61 2–2 (50%) 5–5 (50%) — -0.41
24 2010 1743 144.9 -0.90 -0.51 0.949 49.4% +38 -194 -15 52.2% -0.02 10–9 (53%) 14–7 (67%) — -0.67 2012 1689 117.4 +1.52 -2.94 0.940 48.7% +10 -50 — 45.5% -0.36 1–3 (25%) 6–6 (50%) — +0.51
25 2011 1708 143.8 -0.30 -0.35 0.981 49.5% +47 -57 -27 45.3% -0.39 6–5 (55%) 12–8 (60%) — +0.79 2013 1809 149.3 +2.79 -2.73 0.988 49.7% -11 +4 -192 47.8% -0.11 7–5 (58%) 9–9 (50%) — -2.24
26 2012 1737 144.8 +0.53 -1.27 0.957 49.3% +40 -119 -83 41.1% -0.43 3–9 (25%) 13–15 (46%) — -1.40 2014 1713 128.9 -0.97 -3.58 0.796 46.4% +3 — — 33.3% -1.28 0–6 (0%) 3–3 (50%) — -0.62
27 2013 1678 130.6 -0.70 -1.39 0.958 49.3% +35 -75 +62 46.3% -0.34 1–7 (13%) 6–4 (60%) — -0.19 2015 1729 122.1 +0.44 +1.03 1.284 52.5% +26 — — 57.1% +0.14 1–0 1–0 — -0.11
28 2014 1686 132.7 -0.47 -0.60 0.964 49.2% -20 -108 +86 44.8% -0.28 6–4 (60%) 7–10 (41%) — -0.26 2016 1661 117.0 +0.34 -3.35 0.907 48.9% +50 — — 42.1% -0.32 0–1 2–3 (40%) — +0.06
29 2015 1716 153.5 -0.56 +0.26 0.966 49.5% +47 -150 -2 46.2% -0.07 8–7 (53%) 6–9 (40%) — -0.06 2017 1665 110.8 -1.31 -3.25 0.724 45.2% — — — 16.7% -1.42 1–0 1–2 (33%) — +0.08
30 2016 1694 134.5 -0.30 -1.40 0.864 47.7% -19 — +108 37.2% -0.77 3–2 (60%) 4–5 (44%) — -0.26 2018 1616 97.9 +1.38 +0.15 0.912 48.0% — — — 33.3% -1.67 0–1 1–0 — +0.04
31 2017 1728 130.1 +1.63 -2.29 0.977 50.1% -72 -66 — 47.2% -0.17 0–3 (0%) 4–2 (67%) — -0.83 2019 1605 109.1 +0.20 -3.04 0.961 49.1% — — — 50.0% 0.00 — 1–1 — -0.28
32 2018 1650 117.1 -1.87 -0.92 0.835 46.9% — — +170 36.4% -0.86 1–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2019 1577 114.4 -0.93 -3.10 0.837 47.7% +2 — +208 34.8% -0.83 2–2 (50%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.66 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2020 1569 108.7 -0.29 -0.75 0.732 45.5% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2021 1531 99.7 -1.61 -0.72 0.856 48.7% +30 — — 40.0% -0.20 1–1 0–2 — +0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2022 1516 98.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1839 138.5 -0.39 -0.77 0.940 49.1% +25 -108 +39 45.2% -0.32 54–56 (49%) 80–71 (53%) 105.1 -0.38 — 1886 131.0 +0.91 -3.27 0.900 48.3% -25 -9 -63 40.4% -0.64 18–26 (41%) 43–43 (50%) 98.0 -2.62

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.