H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Sergiy Stakhovsky vs Daniel Brands H2H: 2-0
Sergiy Stakhovsky holds a 2–0 lead over Daniel Brands in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Sergiy Stakhovsky leads 1–0 on grass and 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sergiy Stakhovsky won the 2014 Queen's Club second round 7-5 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
UKR
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
GER
Age 39
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 22, 2019 | Budapest | ATP 250 | Q1 | Clay | Sergiy Stakhovsky | 7-5 6-1 | Daniel Brands | Match data |
| Feb 4, 2019 | Sofia | ATP 250 | Q2 | Hard | Daniel Brands | 6-4 7-6(9) | Sergiy Stakhovsky | Match data |
| Jun 11, 2014* | Queen's Club | ATP 500 | R64 | Grass | Sergiy Stakhovsky | 7-5 6-2 | Daniel Brands | Match data |
| Jan 19, 2011* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Sergiy Stakhovsky | 6-2 6-3 6-4 | Daniel Brands | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sergiy Stakhovsky | #678 | #31 | 1,263 | 1,839 | 145 | 195 | 42.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Daniel Brands | #1,055 | #51 | 896 | 1,886 | 57 | 92 | 38.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Sergiy Stakhovsky | Daniel Brands | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #335 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #220 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #184 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #150 | 1,539 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #195 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 7–5 | 58.3% | #92 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #199 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 9–19 | 32.1% | #104 | 1,670 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #92 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #110 | 1,690 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #60 | 1,750 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #153 | 1,689 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,743 | 0 | 4 | 2013 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #54 | 1,815 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #62 | 1,707 | 0 | 4 | 2014 | 2–11 | 15.4% | #329 | 1,713 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 13–26 | 33.3% | #103 | 1,739 | 0 | 4 | 2015 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #159 | 1,729 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #98 | 1,679 | 0 | 4 | 2016 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #168 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #58 | 1,686 | 0 | 4 | 2017 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #320 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #62 | 1,715 | 0 | 4 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #182 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #109 | 1,693 | 0 | 4 | 2019 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #465 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #122 | 1,728 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #134 | 1,649 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #150 | 1,576 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,568 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #220 | 1,530 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |