H2H data updated: 2026-09-04 00:00 UTC

Sergiy Stakhovsky vs Denis Kudla H2H: 1-0

Sergiy Stakhovsky holds a 1–0 lead over Denis Kudla in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Sergiy Stakhovsky leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Sergiy Stakhovsky won the 2016 Halle Open first round 7-5 4-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sergiy Stakhovsky
UKR Age 40 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Denis Kudla
USA Age 34 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Denis Kudla #62 6-1 2-6 6-2 Sergiy Stakhovsky #150 Match data Oct 22, 2018 Q2 Q Vienna Open ATP 500 Hard
Sergiy Stakhovsky #100 7-5 4-6 6-3 Denis Kudla #60 Match data Jun 16, 2016* R32 Halle Open ATP 500 Grass

1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Sergiy Stakhovsky #678 #31 1,263 1,838 145 196 42.5% 0 0 0 0 4 4
Denis Kudla #1,269 #53 858 1,834 71 132 35.0% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sergiy Stakhovsky Denis Kudla
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2010 1–1 50.0% #496 1,501 0 0
18 2004 0–1 0.0% #335 1,491 0 0 2011 2–2 50.0% #276 1,558 0 0
19 2005 3–3 50.0% #184 1,527 0 0 2012 2–6 25.0% #137 1,574 0 0
20 2006 1–2 33.3% #195 1,525 0 0 2013 5–11 31.2% #114 1,628 0 0
21 2007 0–2 0.0% #199 1,509 0 0 2014 3–5 37.5% #121 1,702 0 0
22 2008 5–4 55.6% #92 1,615 0 1 2015 8–14 36.4% #69 1,759 0 0
23 2009 14–13 51.9% #60 1,751 0 2 2016 8–20 28.6% #131 1,637 0 0
24 2010 24–24 50.0% #46 1,743 0 4 2017 1–1 50.0% #174 1,593 0 0
25 2011 22–26 45.8% #62 1,707 0 4 2018 11–14 44.0% #63 1,789 0 0
26 2012 13–27 32.5% #103 1,737 0 4 2019 11–22 33.3% #113 1,714 0 0
27 2013 10–15 40.0% #98 1,678 0 4 2020 0–1 0.0% #114 1,663 0 0
28 2014 15–19 44.1% #58 1,685 0 4 2021 9–11 45.0% #105 1,702 0 0
29 2015 20–25 44.4% #62 1,715 0 4 2022 6–16 27.3% #106 1,571 0 0
30 2016 6–13 31.6% #109 1,693 0 4 2023 3–5 37.5% #163 1,535 0 0
31 2017 6–8 42.9% #122 1,728 0 4 2024 1–3 25.0% #267 1,553 0 0
32 2018 2–5 28.6% #134 1,650 0 4 — — — — — — —
33 2019 3–6 33.3% #150 1,576 0 4 — — — — — — —
34 2020 0–1 0.0% #202 1,568 0 4 — — — — — — —
35 2021 1–2 33.3% #220 1,530 0 4 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Sergiy Stakhovsky Denis Kudla
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
18 2004 — — — — — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2011 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
19 2005 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% 2012 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2006 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% 2013 1 7 8 12.5% 0 1 1 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
21 2007 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — 2014 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
22 2008 5 2 7 71.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2015 5 12 17 29.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — —
23 2009 12 8 20 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2016 5 12 17 29.4% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — —
24 2010 16 16 32 50.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 2017 — — — — — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
25 2011 12 14 26 46.2% 9 9 18 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2018 6 8 14 42.9% 1 2 3 33.3% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — —
26 2012 9 17 26 34.6% 3 7 10 30.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — 2019 5 13 18 27.8% 2 5 7 28.6% 4 4 8 50.0% — — — —
27 2013 5 7 12 41.7% 2 6 8 25.0% 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — 2020 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
28 2014 7 13 20 35.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 2021 6 9 15 40.0% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
29 2015 15 16 31 48.4% 3 5 8 37.5% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — — 2022 5 11 16 31.3% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
30 2016 3 9 12 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2023 2 4 6 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
31 2017 3 3 6 50.0% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2024 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
32 2018 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2019 2 2 4 50.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2020 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2021 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 90 116 206 43.7% 27 48 75 36.0% 24 28 52 46.2% 4 4 8 50.0% — 39 88 127 30.7% 6 18 24 25.0% 26 26 52 50.0% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 340/341 of Sergiy Stakhovsky's and 201/203 of Denis Kudla's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Sergiy Stakhovsky Denis Kudla
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 2/2 5.5 3.5 51.7% 63.9% 52.5% 59.6% 41.8% 58.3% 39.3%
18 2004 1/1 3.0 0.0 75.0% 52.8% 33.3% 37.5% 0.0% 47.9% 26.2% 2011 4/4 5.0 4.5 49.8% 64.8% 53.5% 58.4% 57.3% 59.1% 36.0%
19 2005 6/6 7.8 2.3 68.1% 69.1% 51.4% 59.4% 48.7% 62.5% 30.3% 2012 8/8 5.0 4.0 55.0% 65.0% 49.5% 56.0% 47.8% 58.2% 33.9%
20 2006 3/3 8.7 3.0 63.9% 69.3% 44.4% 60.4% 28.3% 60.4% 28.8% 2013 16/16 3.6 2.9 59.8% 71.6% 51.7% 62.9% 32.2% 63.5% 33.3%
21 2007 2/2 3.5 2.5 56.3% 61.7% 48.8% 50.0% 25.0% 56.7% 30.6% 2014 8/8 3.4 2.5 61.4% 64.2% 51.5% 72.0% 41.7% 59.5% 37.9%
22 2008 9/9 4.9 2.1 64.2% 72.7% 48.9% 67.9% 38.9% 64.6% 31.6% 2015 21/22 6.1 3.8 61.1% 68.1% 52.0% 50.3% 46.5% 61.7% 34.0%
23 2009 27/27 6.5 2.3 63.7% 71.9% 48.8% 60.8% 43.0% 63.6% 35.5% 2016 27/28 5.8 3.0 59.0% 70.6% 47.7% 51.7% 45.8% 60.9% 34.5%
24 2010 48/48 6.8 2.5 63.4% 71.3% 46.5% 57.4% 34.7% 62.4% 35.6% 2017 2/2 3.5 3.5 64.3% 70.5% 53.8% 47.5% 48.1% 64.5% 40.9%
25 2011 48/48 5.5 1.9 62.0% 70.0% 50.3% 53.4% 40.4% 62.5% 36.8% 2018 25/25 8.4 4.0 56.4% 75.4% 50.5% 51.5% 40.2% 64.5% 33.8%
26 2012 39/40 6.4 3.1 59.5% 71.4% 52.8% 63.8% 36.1% 63.8% 34.7% 2019 33/33 6.1 3.6 57.0% 67.2% 48.3% 51.3% 39.6% 59.2% 33.6%
27 2013 25/25 6.4 2.7 63.1% 70.1% 51.1% 55.3% 37.2% 62.9% 35.6% 2020 1/1 19.0 7.0 61.9% 74.0% 51.6% 58.3% 75.0% 65.5% 30.7%
28 2014 34/34 6.3 3.4 64.2% 72.9% 47.6% 62.6% 43.5% 63.8% 34.9% 2021 20/20 6.5 4.0 55.8% 71.7% 51.1% 49.7% 35.6% 62.6% 33.4%
29 2015 45/45 6.5 2.4 61.9% 71.3% 51.1% 61.8% 35.4% 63.6% 35.1% 2022 22/22 4.9 2.5 62.1% 68.0% 49.6% 54.3% 44.2% 61.1% 32.8%
30 2016 19/19 6.8 4.1 56.6% 71.9% 48.9% 53.3% 39.4% 62.1% 32.7% 2023 8/8 4.3 2.6 61.1% 68.2% 52.6% 49.1% 49.2% 62.0% 30.9%
31 2017 14/14 9.4 2.5 62.2% 75.4% 51.6% 57.0% 39.5% 66.3% 32.9% 2024 4/4 4.8 2.5 54.3% 65.9% 42.6% 45.8% 25.7% 55.1% 35.7%
32 2018 7/7 8.9 3.3 61.6% 69.4% 46.8% 52.2% 21.1% 60.6% 32.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2019 9/9 9.1 2.7 63.5% 71.2% 49.6% 65.1% 39.6% 63.1% 30.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2020 1/1 4.0 3.0 67.1% 58.8% 48.0% 66.7% 100.0% 55.3% 32.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2021 3/3 9.0 4.3 57.2% 76.8% 51.5% 65.6% 56.1% 66.0% 29.1% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 340/341 6.6 2.7 62.2% 71.3% 49.6% 59.0% 38.3% 63.1% 34.7% — 201/203 5.8 3.4 58.4% 69.4% 50.0% 53.4% 41.9% 61.3% 33.9%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Sergiy Stakhovsky Denis Kudla
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1488 101.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1501 96.9 -2.83 -2.17 0.943 49.3% — — — 40.0% -0.20 1–0 0–1 — +0.38
18 2004 1492 96.9 +1.37 -0.87 0.503 37.8% — — — 0.0% -4.50 — — — -0.01 2011 1559 106.8 -2.45 -0.04 0.882 49.1% — — +89 50.0% -0.20 1–1 2–0 — +0.28
19 2005 1528 104.8 -1.62 -2.88 0.808 46.3% +15 — — 46.7% -0.53 2–1 (67%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.25 2012 1575 117.0 -1.45 -0.61 0.812 46.4% +24 — — 33.3% -1.13 2–2 (50%) 2–4 (33%) 99.6 +0.04
20 2006 1525 115.1 +0.53 -0.16 0.727 45.0% -1 — — 37.5% -1.25 1–1 1–0 — -0.41 2013 1629 124.1 -1.05 -1.44 0.913 48.6% -38 — +119 34.9% -0.42 1–2 (33%) 0–5 (0%) 94.4 +1.13
21 2007 1509 105.4 -2.12 -0.77 0.706 43.5% — — — 0.0% -2.75 — — — +0.11 2014 1703 119.7 -2.21 +1.02 0.937 48.9% -49 — +117 36.4% -0.59 1–1 1–1 — -0.25
22 2008 1615 119.8 -0.38 -0.29 0.891 48.7% +20 — — 52.6% -0.16 3–0 (100%) 2–0 — -0.41 2015 1759 142.0 -2.26 -1.39 0.887 48.2% -24 — +121 40.3% -0.47 3–4 (43%) 3–4 (43%) 97.9 +0.36
23 2009 1751 134.9 -0.48 -0.33 0.976 50.0% +28 -170 -104 51.5% -0.01 7–4 (64%) 6–3 (67%) 105.1 +1.40 2016 1637 127.5 -2.48 -0.93 0.882 47.5% +20 -22 +109 30.0% -1.09 5–5 (50%) 5–5 (50%) 99.3 -0.48
24 2010 1743 144.9 -0.90 -0.51 0.949 49.4% +38 -194 -15 52.2% -0.02 10–9 (53%) 14–7 (67%) 105.2 -0.67 2017 1593 110.5 -3.46 +3.63 1.150 51.8% — — — 40.0% +0.40 1–0 — — +0.35
25 2011 1708 143.8 -0.30 -0.35 0.981 49.5% +47 -57 -27 45.3% -0.39 6–5 (55%) 12–8 (60%) 103.7 +0.79 2018 1790 136.9 +0.60 -0.85 0.952 49.2% -49 -94 0 45.3% -0.31 2–3 (40%) 5–8 (38%) 99.1 -1.08
26 2012 1737 144.8 +0.53 -1.27 0.957 49.3% +40 -119 -83 41.1% -0.43 3–9 (25%) 13–15 (46%) 95.4 -1.40 2019 1715 129.0 -3.76 -1.81 0.825 46.4% -3 -110 +45 36.4% -0.97 5–4 (56%) 6–6 (50%) 101.3 -0.65
27 2013 1678 130.6 -0.70 -1.39 0.958 49.3% +35 -75 +62 46.3% -0.34 1–7 (13%) 6–4 (60%) 95.4 -0.19 2020 1663 114.4 -0.49 +1.01 0.888 49.1% — — — 40.0% -0.60 0–1 1–0 — -0.17
28 2014 1686 132.7 -0.47 -0.60 0.964 49.2% -20 -108 +86 44.8% -0.28 6–4 (60%) 7–10 (41%) 102.0 -0.26 2021 1703 130.5 -0.68 -1.57 0.893 48.0% -32 — +158 42.9% -0.43 6–3 (67%) 6–6 (50%) 103.2 +0.54
29 2015 1716 153.5 -0.56 +0.26 0.966 49.5% +47 -150 -2 46.2% -0.07 8–7 (53%) 6–9 (40%) 102.1 -0.06 2022 1571 126.0 -2.43 -1.28 0.845 47.4% +31 — +202 34.4% -0.87 4–6 (40%) 3–12 (20%) 93.4 +0.23
30 2016 1694 134.5 -0.30 -1.40 0.864 47.7% -19 — +108 37.2% -0.77 3–2 (60%) 4–5 (44%) 101.6 -0.26 2023 1536 113.1 -1.49 -0.41 0.815 46.2% +20 — — 36.4% -1.27 2–0 3–1 (75%) — -0.05
31 2017 1728 130.1 +1.63 -2.29 0.977 50.1% -72 -66 — 47.2% -0.17 0–3 (0%) 4–2 (67%) 98.6 -0.83 2024 1554 115.2 -2.14 -1.75 0.794 45.3% +28 — — 40.0% -1.10 0–2 1–1 — +0.26
32 2018 1650 117.1 -1.87 -0.92 0.835 46.9% — — +170 36.4% -0.86 1–1 1–2 (33%) — +0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2019 1577 114.4 -0.93 -3.10 0.837 47.7% +2 — +208 34.8% -0.83 2–2 (50%) 2–2 (50%) 99.2 +0.66 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2020 1569 108.7 -0.29 -0.75 0.732 45.5% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.10 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2021 1531 99.7 -1.61 -0.72 0.856 48.7% +30 — — 40.0% -0.20 1–1 0–2 — +0.06 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2022 1516 98.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1839 138.5 -0.39 -0.77 0.940 49.1% +25 -108 +39 45.2% -0.32 54–56 (49%) 80–71 (53%) 105.1 -0.38 — 1835 131.9 -1.89 -1.10 0.878 47.8% -7 -74 +95 37.7% -0.71 34–34 (50%) 38–54 (41%) 97.1 +0.44

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.