H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Sergiy Stakhovsky vs Frank Dancevic H2H: 1-0
Sergiy Stakhovsky holds a 1–0 lead over Frank Dancevic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Sergiy Stakhovsky leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Sergiy Stakhovsky won the 2009 Newport third round 7-6(9) 2-6 7-5.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
UKR
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CAN
Age 41
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 6, 2014 | Sydney | ATP 250 | Q2 | Hard | Sergiy Stakhovsky | 6-3 6-2 | Frank Dancevic | Match data |
| Oct 21, 2013 | Basel | ATP 500 | Q1 | Hard | Sergiy Stakhovsky | 6-2 6-4 | Frank Dancevic | Match data |
| Jul 9, 2009* | Newport | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | Sergiy Stakhovsky | 7-6(9) 2-6 7-5 | Frank Dancevic | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sergiy Stakhovsky | #678 | #31 | 1,263 | 1,839 | 145 | 195 | 42.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Frank Dancevic | #406 | #65 | 783 | 1,773 | 54 | 89 | 37.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Sergiy Stakhovsky | Frank Dancevic | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #335 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 2002 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #434 | 1,505 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #184 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #201 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #195 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #171 | 1,486 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #199 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #188 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #92 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #88 | 1,558 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #60 | 1,750 | 0 | 2 | 2007 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #72 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,743 | 0 | 4 | 2008 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #130 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #62 | 1,707 | 0 | 4 | 2009 | 9–11 | 45.0% | #143 | 1,700 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 13–26 | 33.3% | #103 | 1,739 | 0 | 4 | 2010 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #269 | 1,664 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #98 | 1,679 | 0 | 4 | 2011 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #151 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #58 | 1,686 | 0 | 4 | 2012 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #165 | 1,605 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #62 | 1,715 | 0 | 4 | 2013 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #122 | 1,688 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #109 | 1,693 | 0 | 4 | 2014 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #149 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #122 | 1,728 | 0 | 4 | 2015 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #209 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 |
| 2018 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #134 | 1,649 | 0 | 4 | 2016 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #241 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 |
| 2019 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #150 | 1,576 | 0 | 4 | 2017 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #363 | 1,658 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,568 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #220 | 1,530 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |