H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 01:16 UTC
Sergiy Stakhovsky vs Henri Laaksonen
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Sergiy Stakhovsky vs Henri Laaksonen.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
UKR
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
0
–
0
0 main draw meetings
SUI
Age 34
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No head-to-head meetings found. | ||||||||
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sergiy Stakhovsky | #678 | #31 | 1,263 | 1,839 | 145 | 195 | 42.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Henri Laaksonen | #1,622 | #84 | 798 | 1,830 | 37 | 64 | 36.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Sergiy Stakhovsky | Henri Laaksonen | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #335 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #291 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #184 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #244 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #195 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #318 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #199 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #181 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #92 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 | 2016 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #60 | 1,750 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #121 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,743 | 0 | 4 | 2018 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #169 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #62 | 1,707 | 0 | 4 | 2019 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #104 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 13–26 | 33.3% | #103 | 1,739 | 0 | 4 | 2020 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #134 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #98 | 1,679 | 0 | 4 | 2021 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #98 | 1,790 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #58 | 1,686 | 0 | 4 | 2022 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #172 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #62 | 1,715 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #109 | 1,693 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #122 | 1,728 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #134 | 1,649 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #150 | 1,576 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,568 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #220 | 1,530 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |