H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 19:16 UTC
Sergiy Stakhovsky vs Roberto Quiroz
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Sergiy Stakhovsky vs Roberto Quiroz.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
UKR
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
0
–
0
0 main draw meetings
ECU
Age 34
Left-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| No head-to-head meetings found. | ||||||||
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sergiy Stakhovsky | #678 | #31 | 1,263 | 1,839 | 145 | 195 | 42.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
| Roberto Quiroz | #1,146 | #172 | 311 | 1,547 | 3 | 3 | 50.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Sergiy Stakhovsky | Roberto Quiroz | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #335 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #181 | 1,476 | 0 | 0 |
| 2005 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #184 | 1,528 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #298 | 1,515 | 0 | 0 |
| 2006 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #195 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2007 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #199 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2008 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #92 | 1,614 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2009 | 14–13 | 51.9% | #60 | 1,750 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2010 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #46 | 1,743 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2011 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #62 | 1,707 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2012 | 13–26 | 33.3% | #103 | 1,739 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2013 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #98 | 1,679 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2014 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #58 | 1,686 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2015 | 20–25 | 44.4% | #62 | 1,715 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2016 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #109 | 1,693 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #122 | 1,728 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2018 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #134 | 1,649 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #150 | 1,576 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2020 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #202 | 1,568 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2021 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #220 | 1,530 | 0 | 4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |