Simon Greul
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Juan Monaco | 0 | 3 | 3 | Jan 19, 2011 | H2H |
| Richard Gasquet | 1 | 2 | 3 | Sep 1, 2010 | H2H |
| Benjamin Becker | 1 | 2 | 3 | Jun 18, 2010 | H2H |
| Tommy Robredo | 1 | 2 | 3 | Jun 17, 2010 | H2H |
| David Ferrer | 0 | 3 | 3 | Feb 18, 2010 | H2H |
H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC
Simon Greul vs Rik De Voest
Compare the head-to-head record, career totals, season-by-season performance, and match log for Simon Greul vs Rik De Voest.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
H2H
0
–
0
0 main draw meetings
H2H Match Log
| Player | Score | Player | Match Data | Date | Round | Tournament | Category | Surface |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rik De Voest | 7-5 7-6(4) | Simon Greul | Match data | Feb 13, 2012 | Q2 | ABN AMRO Open | ATP 500 | Hard |
1 qualifying meeting shown in the table; qualifying is excluded from the H2H score. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories | Finals | 500 including documented historical predecessor categories | 250 including documented historical predecessor categories | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Simon Greul | #563 | #55 | 855 | 1,752 | 43 | 73 | 37.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Rik De Voest | #1,088 | #110 | 538 | 1,692 | 19 | 38 | 33.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Simon Greul | Rik De Voest | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 22 | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #252 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #241 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2005 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #130 | 1,439 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 3–2 | 60.0% | #207 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2006 | 11–16 | 40.7% | #82 | 1,536 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2007 | 2–10 | 16.7% | #216 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | 2006 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #135 | 1,451 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2008 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #126 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #120 | 1,580 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2009 | 15–15 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,697 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #159 | 1,651 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2010 | 12–25 | 32.4% | #130 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #236 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2011 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #154 | 1,607 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #181 | 1,630 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #126 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #258 | 1,604 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #171 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
Surface Results by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.
| Age | Simon Greul | Rik De Voest | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | Yr | Hard | Clay | Grass | Carpet | |||||||||||||||||||||||||
| W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | W | L | M | Win % | |||
| 22 | 2003 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2005 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | 2004 | 3 | 2 | 5 | 60.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 25 | 2006 | 6 | 7 | 13 | 46.2% | 4 | 6 | 10 | 40.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2007 | 2 | 8 | 10 | 20.0% | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 1 | 6 | 7 | 14.3% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 27 | 2008 | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 3 | 3 | 6 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2009 | 6 | 9 | 15 | 40.0% | 8 | 5 | 13 | 61.5% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 37.5% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 29 | 2010 | 3 | 7 | 10 | 30.0% | 7 | 15 | 22 | 31.8% | 2 | 3 | 5 | 40.0% | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 1 | 4 | 5 | 20.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 2011 | 2 | 2 | 4 | 50.0% | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 0 | 2 | 2 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 4 | 3 | 7 | 57.1% | — | — | — | — | 1 | 1 | 2 | 50.0% | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 0 | 3 | 3 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0.0% | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 19 | 33 | 52 | 36.5% | 20 | 32 | 52 | 38.5% | 3 | 6 | 9 | 33.3% | 1 | 2 | 3 | 33.3% | — | 16 | 30 | 46 | 34.8% | — | — | — | — | 3 | 8 | 11 | 27.3% | — | — | — | — |
Performance Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 115/116 of Simon Greul's and 57/57 of Rik De Voest's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.
| Age | Simon Greul | Rik De Voest | ||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | Yr | Sample | Aces/M | DFs/M | 1st Sv% | 1st Pts% | 2nd Pts% | BP Saved% | BP Conv% | Svc Pts% | Ret Pts% | |
| 22 | 2003 | 1/1 | 1.0 | 5.0 | 50.6% | 57.1% | 56.1% | 50.0% | 25.0% | 56.6% | 32.3% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 4/4 | 1.3 | 1.5 | 62.9% | 73.6% | 51.7% | 55.0% | 23.6% | 64.6% | 33.9% |
| 24 | 2005 | 2/2 | 15.0 | 4.5 | 56.2% | 70.5% | 47.6% | 58.3% | 27.1% | 60.3% | 31.5% | 2004 | 5/5 | 5.8 | 3.0 | 55.9% | 68.2% | 55.4% | 63.4% | 44.7% | 62.5% | 35.6% |
| 25 | 2006 | 27/27 | 3.7 | 2.9 | 54.9% | 67.6% | 48.2% | 56.0% | 34.4% | 59.0% | 35.4% | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2007 | 12/12 | 3.8 | 2.2 | 55.7% | 63.3% | 49.3% | 49.7% | 35.9% | 56.9% | 34.2% | 2006 | 9/9 | 3.6 | 2.1 | 58.0% | 67.0% | 48.0% | 61.8% | 30.9% | 59.1% | 32.4% |
| 27 | 2008 | 1/1 | 4.0 | 0.0 | 52.6% | 56.1% | 45.9% | 50.0% | 50.0% | 51.3% | 25.7% | 2007 | 7/7 | 3.6 | 1.7 | 60.9% | 72.4% | 46.1% | 57.3% | 31.4% | 61.7% | 38.4% |
| 28 | 2009 | 30/30 | 4.4 | 3.2 | 56.1% | 70.1% | 51.0% | 54.2% | 40.3% | 61.6% | 35.4% | 2008 | 10/10 | 4.1 | 2.3 | 57.6% | 68.1% | 50.8% | 51.5% | 52.8% | 60.5% | 33.0% |
| 29 | 2010 | 36/37 | 2.7 | 3.7 | 58.4% | 66.2% | 47.4% | 56.1% | 47.6% | 58.4% | 34.1% | 2009 | 6/6 | 2.8 | 2.2 | 58.1% | 68.1% | 47.5% | 57.5% | 35.2% | 58.5% | 31.6% |
| 30 | 2011 | 6/6 | 4.8 | 4.5 | 58.1% | 70.8% | 56.1% | 61.4% | 42.6% | 64.5% | 37.1% | 2010 | 3/3 | 7.3 | 2.3 | 65.9% | 66.2% | 47.8% | 50.1% | 38.7% | 59.8% | 34.6% |
| 31 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 9/9 | 4.1 | 1.2 | 61.1% | 69.8% | 47.8% | 64.8% | 37.8% | 61.1% | 35.3% |
| 32 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 3/3 | 5.0 | 0.0 | 66.2% | 65.9% | 45.3% | 53.3% | 30.2% | 59.3% | 32.6% |
| 33 | — | —/— | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 1/1 | 3.0 | 1.0 | 68.9% | 56.9% | 47.8% | 63.6% | 33.3% | 54.1% | 33.3% |
| Career | — | 115/116 | 3.8 | 3.3 | 56.5% | 67.4% | 49.2% | 55.1% | 40.6% | 59.5% | 34.8% | — | 57/57 | 4.0 | 1.9 | 60.0% | 68.7% | 48.9% | 58.1% | 37.5% | 60.6% | 34.1% |
Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.
| Age | Simon Greul | Rik De Voest | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | Yr | Elo | P+ | Serve+ | Return+ | PD | TPW% | Hard Elo | Clay Elo | Grass Elo | Set Win % | Set Margin | Dec. Set | Tiebreak | Pressure+ | Schedule | |
| 22 | 2003 | 1501 | 101.9 | -1.99 | -0.91 | 0.744 | 43.8% | — | — | — | 33.3% | -2.00 | 0–1 | — | — | +0.13 | 2002 | 1488 | 99.5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2004 | 1489 | 98.0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 1469 | 105.2 | -0.66 | +1.23 | 0.958 | 48.7% | — | — | — | 50.0% | +0.13 | — | 0–1 | — | +0.08 |
| 24 | 2005 | 1439 | 95.7 | -0.95 | -3.32 | 0.794 | 46.1% | — | — | — | 33.3% | -1.67 | 0–2 | 1–1 | — | +0.05 | 2004 | 1509 | 105.1 | -0.63 | -0.05 | 0.950 | 49.7% | +36 | — | — | 54.5% | +0.09 | 1–0 | 1–0 | — | +0.28 |
| 25 | 2006 | 1536 | 124.7 | -2.24 | -0.59 | 0.865 | 47.6% | +22 | -26 | — | 42.4% | -0.59 | 4–4 (50%) | 4–5 (44%) | — | -0.60 | 2005 | 1504 | 100.4 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 26 | 2007 | 1480 | 107.3 | -3.43 | -2.92 | 0.794 | 45.3% | +27 | — | — | 21.4% | -1.75 | 1–2 (33%) | 1–3 (25%) | — | +0.71 | 2006 | 1451 | 112.9 | -1.37 | -2.43 | 0.791 | 46.3% | +35 | — | — | 30.0% | -1.15 | 0–2 | 0–1 | — | +0.04 |
| 27 | 2008 | 1523 | 105.5 | -1.05 | +0.24 | 0.528 | 39.2% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.33 | — | — | — | +0.05 | 2007 | 1581 | 111.0 | -1.61 | +1.14 | 1.003 | 50.2% | -3 | — | — | 28.6% | -1.43 | — | 2–2 (50%) | — | +0.13 |
| 28 | 2009 | 1698 | 130.7 | -1.08 | -1.71 | 0.922 | 48.8% | -145 | +6 | — | 45.9% | -0.30 | 6–2 (75%) | 4–2 (67%) | — | +1.19 | 2008 | 1651 | 120.0 | -2.23 | -1.52 | 0.834 | 47.1% | +18 | — | — | 30.4% | -1.22 | 1–1 | 2–3 (40%) | — | +0.47 |
| 29 | 2010 | 1633 | 124.1 | -3.82 | -1.99 | 0.820 | 46.7% | -73 | -3 | -17 | 35.4% | -1.09 | 1–4 (20%) | 7–12 (37%) | — | -1.61 | 2009 | 1576 | 109.5 | -3.14 | -1.79 | 0.761 | 46.0% | +30 | — | — | 23.1% | -1.23 | 0–1 | 0–4 (0%) | — | +0.41 |
| 30 | 2011 | 1607 | 113.5 | -0.49 | +1.49 | 1.047 | 51.0% | -36 | — | — | 50.0% | 0.00 | 0–1 | 1–4 (20%) | — | +0.39 | 2010 | 1630 | 119.7 | -1.54 | -0.67 | 0.860 | 47.5% | — | — | — | 33.3% | -0.92 | 0–2 | 2–1 (67%) | — | +0.05 |
| 31 | 2012 | 1536 | 103.7 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2011 | 1665 | 118.2 | -0.48 | -1.65 | 0.907 | 49.0% | -23 | — | — | 47.6% | -0.24 | 2–1 (67%) | 1–1 | — | +0.95 |
| 32 | 2013 | 1481 | 102.1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 1605 | 111.1 | -0.91 | -1.40 | 0.802 | 46.5% | +28 | — | — | 30.0% | -1.10 | 0–2 | 0–1 | — | +0.13 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 1585 | 113.2 | -2.33 | -1.71 | 0.725 | 44.5% | — | — | — | 0.0% | -3.00 | — | — | — | +0.13 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2014 | 1558 | 101.6 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Career | — | 1753 | 122.8 | -2.43 | -1.50 | 0.859 | 47.4% | -45 | -6 | -17 | 38.8% | -0.82 | 12–16 (43%) | 18–27 (40%) | 98.1 | +0.27 | — | 1692 | 117.2 | -1.48 | -1.02 | 0.865 | 47.8% | +15 | — | — | 35.1% | -0.88 | 4–9 (31%) | 8–14 (36%) | 91.9 | +4.68 |
Career Rivalries
Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.
Rik De Voest
all rivalries →| Opponent | W | L | M | Last Played | H2H |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Andreas Seppi | 1 | 1 | 2 | Feb 16, 2012 | H2H |
| David Nalbandian | 0 | 2 | 2 | Sep 1, 2010 | H2H |
| Ivan Navarro | 1 | 1 | 2 | Feb 5, 2009 | H2H |
| Tommy Robredo | 0 | 2 | 2 | Sep 14, 2007 | H2H |
| Andy Roddick | 0 | 2 | 2 | Jul 27, 2006 | H2H |