H2H data updated: 2026-09-01 00:00 UTC

Simone Bolelli vs Matthew Ebden H2H: 1-0

Simone Bolelli holds a 1–0 lead over Matthew Ebden in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Simone Bolelli leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Simone Bolelli won the 2014 Shenzhen round of 32 6-4 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Simone Bolelli
ITA Age 40 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Matthew Ebden
AUS Age 38 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Simone Bolelli #76 6-4 6-2 Matthew Ebden #98 Match data Sep 25, 2014* R32 Shenzhen ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Simone Bolelli #1,391 #36 1,686 1,931 113 157 41.9% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Matthew Ebden #970 #39 1,134 1,849 75 129 36.8% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Simone Bolelli Matthew Ebden
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
20 2006 0–4 0.0% #127 1,465 0 0 — — — — — — —
21 2007 8–14 36.4% #67 1,601 0 0 — — — — — — —
22 2008 26–28 48.1% #41 1,775 0 0 2010 1–2 33.3% #196 1,526 0 0
23 2009 14–22 38.9% #93 1,698 0 0 2011 10–10 50.0% #86 1,762 0 0
24 2010 5–11 31.2% #107 1,672 0 0 2012 15–23 39.5% #105 1,644 0 0
25 2011 4–8 33.3% #134 1,679 0 0 2013 4–11 26.7% #68 1,634 0 0
26 2012 6–10 37.5% #84 1,713 0 0 2014 5–21 19.2% #231 1,539 0 0
27 2013 6–8 42.9% #245 1,693 0 0 2015 1–6 14.3% #105 1,631 0 0
28 2014 6–8 42.9% #55 1,744 0 0 2016 0–4 0.0% #698 1,573 0 0
29 2015 28–25 52.8% #58 1,874 0 0 2017 9–7 56.2% #76 1,739 0 0
30 2016 2–8 20.0% #464 1,791 0 0 2018 19–22 46.3% #46 1,790 0 0
31 2017 2–4 33.3% #171 1,801 0 0 2019 5–16 23.8% #244 1,654 0 0
32 2018 5–4 55.6% #141 1,788 0 0 — — — — — — —
33 2019 1–3 25.0% #334 1,736 0 0 2021 6–5 54.5% #237 1,591 0 0
34 — — — — — — — 2022 0–1 0.0% #740 1,527 0 0
36 — — — — — — — 2024 0–1 0.0% — 1,526 0 0

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Simone Bolelli Matthew Ebden
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
20 2006 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2007 3 6 9 33.3% 3 6 9 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2008 12 18 30 40.0% 11 7 18 61.1% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2010 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — —
23 2009 6 13 19 31.6% 7 7 14 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2011 7 8 15 46.7% — — — — 3 2 5 60.0% — — — —
24 2010 0 5 5 0.0% 5 6 11 45.5% — — — — — — — — 2012 14 16 30 46.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — —
25 2011 1 2 3 33.3% 1 5 6 16.7% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2013 4 9 13 30.8% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
26 2012 1 3 4 25.0% 3 5 8 37.5% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — 2014 4 12 16 25.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — —
27 2013 3 3 6 50.0% 3 4 7 42.9% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2015 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
28 2014 2 4 6 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — 2016 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2015 16 15 31 51.6% 9 7 16 56.3% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 2017 4 4 8 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
30 2016 1 6 7 14.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — 2018 12 16 28 42.9% 0 2 2 0.0% 7 4 11 63.6% — — — —
31 2017 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2019 3 9 12 25.0% 0 2 2 0.0% 2 5 7 28.6% — — — —
32 2018 — — — — 4 3 7 57.1% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2019 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — 2021 6 5 11 54.5% — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 46 80 126 36.5% 50 59 109 45.9% 16 16 32 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — 55 89 144 38.2% 1 14 15 6.7% 19 26 45 42.2% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 266/270 of Simone Bolelli's and 203/203 of Matthew Ebden's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Simone Bolelli Matthew Ebden
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 2006 4/4 4.0 0.8 61.9% 62.3% 51.2% 60.8% 21.9% 58.5% 33.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 2007 22/22 4.5 1.1 65.5% 68.7% 52.3% 48.4% 46.5% 63.0% 29.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 2008 53/54 5.0 1.4 66.9% 70.0% 54.6% 67.0% 39.3% 64.9% 33.3% 2010 3/3 6.3 1.0 66.7% 72.6% 58.1% 64.3% 61.7% 67.6% 31.2%
23 2009 35/36 4.7 1.4 62.8% 69.0% 52.1% 63.8% 34.1% 62.8% 33.4% 2011 20/20 5.8 2.7 61.6% 72.0% 47.9% 47.2% 36.9% 63.0% 35.9%
24 2010 16/16 3.4 1.5 67.1% 66.4% 44.3% 48.6% 45.6% 59.2% 34.1% 2012 38/38 5.4 4.1 62.3% 68.9% 44.8% 52.5% 33.0% 59.8% 34.5%
25 2011 12/12 3.1 0.4 69.6% 62.8% 52.8% 55.1% 51.6% 59.7% 32.4% 2013 15/15 5.6 5.7 56.5% 73.1% 45.0% 50.4% 30.9% 61.0% 34.2%
26 2012 16/16 2.9 2.0 64.9% 69.4% 46.3% 52.2% 50.5% 61.5% 33.7% 2014 26/26 4.4 6.2 57.7% 68.5% 39.2% 44.0% 37.7% 55.6% 32.2%
27 2013 14/14 3.6 1.7 63.1% 66.1% 51.9% 38.0% 43.4% 61.0% 33.4% 2015 7/7 7.1 5.0 58.8% 71.7% 51.1% 63.2% 44.0% 62.9% 32.2%
28 2014 14/14 5.7 2.6 64.7% 70.3% 59.7% 44.0% 31.9% 66.1% 33.2% 2016 4/4 2.8 3.8 53.6% 51.5% 39.7% 44.0% 45.5% 46.2% 25.6%
29 2015 52/53 4.2 1.6 66.7% 72.3% 56.2% 63.8% 47.2% 66.8% 35.1% 2017 16/16 4.7 4.4 64.7% 71.6% 47.8% 54.0% 39.3% 63.1% 38.2%
30 2016 9/10 5.9 1.7 65.1% 66.8% 49.0% 60.6% 44.0% 60.3% 28.9% 2018 41/41 7.5 5.3 59.7% 72.5% 50.1% 59.9% 42.6% 63.3% 35.2%
31 2017 6/6 2.5 1.0 73.1% 61.7% 58.7% 62.5% 45.4% 60.9% 33.2% 2019 21/21 7.0 6.0 59.8% 71.7% 42.0% 54.0% 46.1% 59.9% 35.6%
32 2018 9/9 2.0 1.1 76.5% 65.6% 52.5% 65.5% 35.4% 62.1% 37.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2019 4/4 1.8 1.0 68.3% 62.6% 53.1% 50.6% 66.7% 59.4% 28.4% 2021 11/11 4.3 3.3 62.6% 71.7% 48.9% 64.3% 49.0% 62.5% 34.1%
34 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2022 1/1 5.0 3.0 69.2% 83.3% 54.2% 0.0% 50.0% 74.4% 27.4%
Career — 266/270 4.2 1.5 66.3% 68.8% 53.1% 58.4% 42.5% 63.4% 33.3% — 203/204 5.8 4.7 60.4% 70.7% 46.0% 53.2% 39.6% 60.8% 34.5%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Simone Bolelli Matthew Ebden
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
19 2005 1496 97.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1500 97.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2006 1465 108.7 -0.66 -0.84 0.803 46.1% — — — 20.0% -1.60 0–2 1–3 (25%) — -0.29 2008 1486 97.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
21 2007 1602 127.2 +0.03 -4.56 0.806 47.1% -42 -20 — 34.6% -0.88 1–1 4–6 (40%) — -1.31 2009 1490 102.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
22 2008 1775 145.8 +2.16 -1.96 0.948 49.3% -80 -27 -102 49.6% -0.16 3–9 (25%) 17–16 (52%) — -1.86 2010 1526 117.9 +1.93 +0.66 0.965 49.8% +20 — — 28.6% -0.57 — — — -0.49
23 2009 1699 138.5 +0.14 -1.79 0.899 48.4% -66 +76 — 42.2% -0.63 5–6 (45%) 8–10 (44%) — -2.05 2011 1762 127.8 +1.26 -1.35 0.971 49.6% -32 — -47 44.4% -0.42 4–1 (80%) 1–4 (20%) — +0.59
24 2010 1673 123.9 -1.48 -2.28 0.836 46.4% -130 +148 — 33.3% -1.12 0–3 (0%) 6–5 (55%) — -0.61 2012 1645 128.5 -2.57 -1.66 0.858 47.3% +15 -179 +28 39.8% -0.69 9–5 (64%) 8–4 (67%) — -0.07
25 2011 1679 123.8 -1.26 -2.49 0.805 46.3% -108 +81 +96 36.7% -0.93 — 4–4 (50%) — -0.44 2013 1635 122.7 -1.51 -1.64 0.876 47.9% +18 — — 31.6% -1.24 2–5 (29%) 2–3 (40%) — -0.71
26 2012 1713 127.3 -0.23 -1.02 0.877 47.7% -107 +38 +114 37.8% -1.03 1–1 5–2 (71%) — -0.65 2014 1540 122.0 -6.43 -2.74 0.726 44.3% +30 -112 +36 26.2% -1.63 3–4 (43%) 1–5 (17%) — -0.48
27 2013 1693 126.1 -1.20 -2.42 0.855 46.8% -60 +25 — 43.3% -0.77 3–1 (75%) 2–1 (67%) — +0.13 2015 1631 122.0 -2.35 -0.31 0.869 48.1% -24 — +48 30.0% -0.35 0–3 (0%) 0–6 (0%) — +0.22
28 2014 1744 131.5 +2.15 -1.19 0.981 49.0% -78 +17 +83 45.7% -0.52 3–3 (50%) 4–2 (67%) — +0.20 2016 1573 113.0 -4.76 -3.67 0.476 37.3% -25 — — 12.5% -3.13 — — — +0.28
29 2015 1874 157.5 +2.49 -0.19 1.057 50.9% -60 0 -28 53.5% +0.16 8–8 (50%) 13–13 (50%) — -3.63 2017 1739 127.4 -1.27 +2.03 1.034 50.6% -69 — +46 50.0% +0.21 5–1 (83%) 2–5 (29%) — +1.33
30 2016 1792 125.5 -1.80 -4.48 0.729 46.0% -65 — — 29.2% -1.54 0–1 4–2 (67%) — -0.64 2018 1791 148.3 -0.68 +0.04 0.958 49.3% -42 — +64 47.1% -0.21 6–6 (50%) 9–9 (50%) — -0.04
31 2017 1802 128.3 -0.83 -0.46 0.850 48.0% — — — 38.9% -0.72 0–1 0–2 — -0.45 2019 1654 126.9 -3.44 +0.06 0.888 47.9% +33 — +98 33.3% -0.87 2–5 (29%) 2–4 (33%) — -0.35
32 2018 1788 126.3 +1.16 +0.59 1.003 50.3% — +93 — 50.0% -0.04 2–1 (67%) 3–1 (75%) — -0.61 2020 1631 103.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2019 1737 109.6 -1.97 -2.79 0.700 44.5% -17 — — 22.2% -1.55 — 0–1 — +0.08 2021 1592 115.4 +0.31 -1.06 0.910 49.0% +57 — — 61.9% +0.67 2–1 (67%) 4–1 (80%) — +0.15
34 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2022 1527 96.8 -2.43 +2.78 1.068 50.0% — — — 0.0% -1.00 — 0–2 — +0.25
36 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2024 1527 107.2 — — — — — — — 0.0% -5.50 — — — -0.17
Career — 1932 141.2 +0.75 -1.74 0.911 48.5% -70 +37 +10 43.7% -0.51 26–37 (41%) 71–68 (51%) 98.2 -4.54 — 1849 131.9 -2.03 -0.86 0.881 47.9% -1 -137 +45 39.0% -0.67 33–31 (52%) 29–43 (40%) 97.8 +0.25

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.