H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 13:16 UTC
Simone Bolelli vs Philipp Petzschner H2H: 0-1
Philipp Petzschner holds a 1–0 lead over Simone Bolelli in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Philipp Petzschner leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Philipp Petzschner won the 2009 Cincinnati Masters second round 7-6(6) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 40
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
GER
Age 42
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 18, 2009* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Philipp Petzschner | 7-6(6) 6-3 | Simone Bolelli | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Simone Bolelli | #1,391 | #36 | 1,686 | 1,920 | 114 | 156 | 42.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Philipp Petzschner | #1,212 | #35 | 1,232 | 1,847 | 85 | 104 | 45.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Simone Bolelli | Philipp Petzschner | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 19 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #367 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2006 | 0–4 | 0.0% | #127 | 1,465 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #399 | 1,526 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2007 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #67 | 1,602 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #301 | 1,504 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2008 | 26–27 | 49.1% | #41 | 1,785 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 23 | 2009 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #93 | 1,694 | 0 | 0 | 2007 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #185 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2010 | 5–11 | 31.2% | #107 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 | 2008 | 10–9 | 52.6% | #66 | 1,735 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 2011 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #134 | 1,679 | 0 | 0 | 2009 | 15–25 | 37.5% | #80 | 1,695 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2012 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #84 | 1,713 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 21–19 | 52.5% | #57 | 1,760 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2013 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #245 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 | 2011 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #63 | 1,763 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2014 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #55 | 1,743 | 0 | 0 | 2012 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #115 | 1,693 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | 2015 | 28–25 | 52.8% | #58 | 1,865 | 0 | 0 | 2013 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #206 | 1,662 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | 2016 | 2–8 | 20.0% | #464 | 1,770 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #421 | 1,658 | 0 | 1 |
| 31 | 2017 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #171 | 1,792 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 32 | 2018 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #141 | 1,783 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2019 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #334 | 1,734 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 39 | 2025 | 1–0 | 100.0% | — | 1,741 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |