H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Sjeng Schalken vs Alex Corretja H2H: 1-4

Alex Corretja holds a 4–1 lead over Sjeng Schalken in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Alex Corretja leads 2–1 on hard courts and 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Alex Corretja won the 2001 Dutch Open semifinal 7-6(4) 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sjeng Schalken
NED Age 49 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1 – 4
5 main draw meetings
Alex Corretja
ESP Age 52 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Alex Corretja #9 7-6(4) 6-1 Sjeng Schalken #32 Match data Jul 21, 2001* SF Dutch Open ATP International Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay
Alex Corretja #7 6-4 7-6(2) Sjeng Schalken #29 Match data Mar 15, 2001* R32 Indian Wells Open Masters 1000 Hard
Alex Corretja #8 6-4 4-6 6-1 Sjeng Schalken #27 Match data Feb 23, 2001* R16 ABN AMRO Open ATP International Series Gold → modern equivalent ATP 500 Hard
Sjeng Schalken #79 6-3 3-6 6-3 Alex Corretja #6 Match data Aug 23, 1997* QF U.S. Pro Tennis Championships World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Alex Corretja #30 7-5 6-2 Sjeng Schalken #98 Match data May 6, 1995* QF Munich Open ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Sjeng Schalken #677 #11 1,790 1,928 280 254 52.4% 0 0 0 1 8 9
Alex Corretja #1,110 #2 3,550 1,998 417 278 60.0% 0 2 1 5 9 17

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sjeng Schalken Alex Corretja
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1994 1–2 33.3% #148 1,501 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1995 17–14 54.8% #69 1,645 0 1 1992 11–13 45.8% #86 1,566 0 0
19 1996 26–26 50.0% #65 1,687 0 2 1993 24–23 51.1% #76 1,658 0 0
20 1997 16–25 39.0% #59 1,633 0 3 1994 44–22 66.7% #22 1,849 0 1
21 1998 22–30 42.3% #66 1,598 0 3 1995 25–27 48.1% #48 1,727 0 1
22 1999 28–26 51.9% #44 1,744 0 4 1996 37–26 58.7% #23 1,783 0 1
23 2000 35–26 57.4% #22 1,823 0 5 1997 49–23 68.1% #12 1,840 0 4
24 2001 36–27 57.1% #26 1,837 0 6 1998 53–20 72.6% #3 1,962 0 9
25 2002 36–27 57.1% #20 1,839 0 7 1999 33–22 60.0% #26 1,771 0 9
26 2003 39–23 62.9% #18 1,822 0 9 2000 52–19 73.2% #8 1,933 0 14
27 2004 17–18 48.6% #57 1,698 0 9 2001 30–20 60.0% #16 1,781 0 15
28 2005 7–10 41.2% #230 1,663 0 9 2002 35–17 67.3% #19 1,851 0 17
29 — — — — — — — 2003 11–22 33.3% #100 1,649 0 17
30 — — — — — — — 2004 12–19 38.7% #114 1,623 0 17
31 — — — — — — — 2005 1–5 16.7% #525 1,571 0 17

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Sjeng Schalken Alex Corretja
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1994 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1995 0 2 2 0.0% 14 8 22 63.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 1992 6 5 11 54.5% 5 8 13 38.5% — — — — — — — —
19 1996 10 10 20 50.0% 10 10 20 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1993 0 3 3 0.0% 24 20 44 54.5% — — — — — — — —
20 1997 11 11 22 50.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 1994 4 3 7 57.1% 39 18 57 68.4% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — —
21 1998 11 15 26 42.3% 5 8 13 38.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1995 1 7 8 12.5% 24 19 43 55.8% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
22 1999 17 16 33 51.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 5 3 8 62.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 1996 12 9 21 57.1% 23 11 34 67.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 0 4 4 0.0%
23 2000 28 17 45 62.2% 4 6 10 40.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 1997 10 9 19 52.6% 38 9 47 80.9% — — — — 1 5 6 16.7%
24 2001 21 15 36 58.3% 8 6 14 57.1% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 1998 24 8 32 75.0% 23 8 31 74.2% 0 2 2 0.0% 6 2 8 75.0%
25 2002 12 16 28 42.9% 5 6 11 45.5% 12 2 14 85.7% 7 3 10 70.0% 1999 13 10 23 56.5% 20 9 29 69.0% — — — — 0 3 3 0.0%
26 2003 23 13 36 63.9% 6 5 11 54.5% 10 2 12 83.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 2000 27 12 39 69.2% 23 5 28 82.1% — — — — 2 2 4 50.0%
27 2004 11 12 23 47.8% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 2001 9 9 18 50.0% 21 8 29 72.4% 0 1 1 0.0% 0 2 2 0.0%
28 2005 3 6 9 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 2002 14 10 24 58.3% 21 6 27 77.8% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 7 10 17 41.2% 4 11 15 26.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 6 9 15 40.0% 5 7 12 41.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 — — — — 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — —
Career — 147 133 280 52.5% 61 66 127 48.0% 47 30 77 61.0% 25 25 50 50.0% — 133 104 237 56.1% 271 144 415 65.3% 3 7 10 30.0% 10 23 33 30.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 466/534 of Sjeng Schalken's and 600/695 of Alex Corretja's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Sjeng Schalken Alex Corretja
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 1994 3/3 3.0 3.7 61.3% 70.8% 53.2% 74.5% 29.2% 64.2% 32.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 1995 29/31 4.6 4.3 60.7% 70.0% 46.7% 57.7% 43.2% 60.7% 38.9% 1992 23/24 1.6 1.0 57.2% 62.8% 47.6% 54.5% 52.6% 56.3% 42.3%
19 1996 44/52 4.6 4.8 56.9% 70.5% 48.1% 62.4% 44.7% 60.7% 36.5% 1993 42/47 2.0 1.5 56.1% 66.8% 51.5% 60.5% 47.8% 59.6% 40.3%
20 1997 33/41 4.2 4.4 58.4% 67.0% 50.3% 56.9% 42.2% 59.7% 35.9% 1994 61/66 2.1 1.7 65.4% 66.6% 51.5% 56.3% 43.8% 60.9% 42.6%
21 1998 41/52 4.3 3.3 59.6% 69.6% 49.3% 59.2% 45.2% 61.2% 37.9% 1995 48/52 1.9 1.2 67.8% 63.4% 49.9% 56.6% 46.5% 59.1% 41.0%
22 1999 46/54 3.5 3.6 62.0% 69.6% 46.4% 53.6% 48.0% 60.6% 40.0% 1996 54/63 3.6 2.4 59.4% 69.1% 52.1% 53.2% 46.2% 62.0% 40.2%
23 2000 53/61 5.3 4.5 56.0% 72.1% 51.2% 57.8% 41.9% 62.7% 38.7% 1997 63/72 3.4 2.6 57.4% 72.3% 53.8% 59.2% 53.3% 64.2% 44.3%
24 2001 53/63 4.0 3.5 60.9% 70.2% 53.1% 54.8% 45.9% 63.4% 40.6% 1998 59/73 4.8 2.3 55.7% 71.9% 52.5% 58.9% 43.5% 63.3% 41.2%
25 2002 52/63 3.1 2.8 66.8% 69.0% 52.9% 53.7% 39.0% 63.6% 38.3% 1999 42/55 4.7 2.3 54.1% 71.2% 54.2% 58.2% 41.2% 63.2% 38.7%
26 2003 60/62 2.7 2.0 67.1% 69.2% 56.7% 56.1% 51.7% 64.7% 40.7% 2000 55/71 5.5 2.3 49.3% 76.1% 54.7% 62.1% 46.8% 65.4% 41.5%
27 2004 35/35 2.6 1.6 73.8% 65.8% 54.7% 55.7% 37.5% 62.8% 36.1% 2001 47/50 5.2 3.7 48.2% 70.7% 52.7% 57.3% 42.9% 61.2% 38.8%
28 2005 17/17 1.5 1.6 71.1% 61.8% 51.4% 55.1% 41.2% 58.8% 38.4% 2002 38/52 4.5 3.1 57.6% 71.7% 55.1% 59.4% 45.5% 64.6% 42.6%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2003 31/33 4.3 3.0 56.3% 68.0% 48.8% 56.4% 35.8% 59.8% 36.6%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 31/31 3.7 3.3 57.9% 68.2% 50.4% 62.4% 41.7% 60.7% 36.9%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2005 6/6 1.3 2.7 60.0% 58.1% 44.6% 55.1% 24.5% 54.5% 36.1%
Career — 466/534 3.8 3.4 62.5% 69.2% 51.3% 56.7% 44.1% 62.1% 38.5% — 600/695 3.7 2.3 57.3% 69.5% 52.2% 58.1% 45.2% 61.9% 40.8%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Sjeng Schalken Alex Corretja
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1994 1502 103.3 +0.17 -1.45 0.912 48.2% — — — 42.9% -0.57 0–1 — — +0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1995 1646 131.2 +0.48 -0.33 0.990 49.8% -114 +64 -77 50.0% -0.04 9–4 (69%) 6–3 (67%) — +0.54 1992 1567 127.1 -2.60 +0.75 0.968 49.4% +6 +8 — 46.6% -0.05 5–4 (56%) 3–5 (38%) — +1.54
19 1996 1688 137.5 -0.72 -1.26 0.929 49.0% -25 +3 -110 50.4% -0.08 10–8 (56%) 6–13 (32%) — +0.30 1993 1658 141.2 -0.53 +1.13 0.997 50.2% -123 +64 — 50.0% +0.33 7–4 (64%) 4–10 (29%) — -1.01
20 1997 1634 136.5 -1.45 -0.70 0.889 47.9% +9 +9 -55 43.8% -0.37 5–7 (42%) 8–10 (44%) — -1.14 1994 1849 150.0 +0.83 +3.51 1.089 51.6% -259 +60 — 58.1% +0.50 23–10 (70%) 12–11 (52%) — -2.60
21 1998 1598 132.0 -0.55 +0.75 0.978 50.0% +23 +20 -38 44.9% -0.20 8–13 (38%) 12–11 (52%) — +1.65 1995 1727 136.5 -1.41 +2.29 1.002 50.0% -169 +65 — 52.4% +0.15 6–11 (35%) 5–6 (45%) — -0.97
22 1999 1745 148.3 -0.52 +2.39 1.015 50.3% -3 -76 -122 51.7% +0.08 8–12 (40%) 9–8 (53%) — -2.44 1996 1784 149.2 +0.51 +2.14 1.060 50.8% -86 +90 -150 55.3% +0.47 10–4 (71%) 6–14 (30%) — -1.11
23 2000 1823 145.8 +1.00 +1.26 1.036 50.5% +28 -171 -172 55.8% +0.34 12–9 (57%) 9–6 (60%) — +0.15 1997 1840 154.1 +2.24 +5.27 1.237 54.3% -146 +167 — 65.9% +1.20 9–10 (47%) 9–8 (53%) — -0.17
24 2001 1838 142.0 +0.82 +2.43 1.108 51.7% -14 -117 -151 53.6% +0.32 14–11 (56%) 7–13 (35%) — +1.67 1998 1963 157.7 +1.53 +2.59 1.122 52.2% -34 +97 — 63.7% +0.90 21–6 (78%) 19–14 (58%) — +0.17
25 2002 1839 143.2 +1.06 +1.20 1.052 50.5% -32 -125 +41 55.2% +0.36 11–7 (61%) 17–18 (49%) — +0.32 1999 1771 145.8 +1.50 +0.88 1.054 51.0% +5 +184 — 55.6% +0.48 16–8 (67%) 12–16 (43%) — +1.15
26 2003 1822 140.9 +2.08 +3.20 1.152 52.4% -22 -111 +167 61.2% +0.65 6–6 (50%) 13–4 (76%) — +1.00 2000 1933 161.5 +3.18 +4.08 1.199 53.1% -19 +143 — 68.0% +1.14 13–6 (68%) 20–10 (67%) — -1.65
27 2004 1698 129.8 -0.34 -0.21 0.972 49.3% -14 -22 +251 53.7% +0.41 4–3 (57%) 5–5 (50%) — +1.66 2001 1781 141.6 -0.54 +1.48 1.001 50.1% -24 +247 — 57.9% +0.20 11–9 (55%) 17–7 (71%) — -0.84
28 2005 1664 127.0 -2.29 +0.67 0.930 48.5% +5 +11 — 41.5% -0.51 3–3 (50%) 1–3 (25%) — -1.00 2002 1851 149.1 +1.45 +3.39 1.201 53.3% -106 +256 — 66.2% +0.99 7–9 (44%) 9–6 (60%) — +0.91
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2003 1650 130.9 -1.00 -0.14 0.912 48.2% +41 +144 — 36.3% -0.62 6–5 (55%) 6–9 (40%) — +0.20
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1623 126.5 -2.17 -0.03 0.939 48.9% +17 +95 — 43.7% -0.35 5–7 (42%) 5–6 (45%) — +0.64
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2005 1572 105.8 -2.46 -1.57 0.794 45.4% — +73 — 9.1% -2.00 0–1 1–3 (25%) — -0.16
Career — 1928 144.9 +0.24 +1.08 1.018 50.3% -6 -38 +4 52.2% +0.15 90–84 (52%) 93–94 (50%) 100.6 +0.52 — 1998 152.9 +0.52 +2.39 1.070 51.3% -50 +121 -150 57.3% +0.52 139–94 (60%) 128–125 (51%) 100.4 -0.56

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.