H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Sjeng Schalken vs Alex Corretja H2H: 1-4

Alex Corretja holds a 4–1 lead over Sjeng Schalken in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Alex Corretja leads 2–1 on hard courts and 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Alex Corretja won the 2001 Amsterdam semifinal 7-6(4) 6-1.

NED Age 49 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1 4
5 main draw meetings
ESP Age 52 Right-Handed 180 cm / 5'11"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jul 21, 2001* Amsterdam ATP 250 SF Clay Alex Corretja #9 7-6(4) 6-1 Sjeng Schalken #32 Match data
Mar 15, 2001* Indian Wells Masters Masters 1000 R32 Hard Alex Corretja #7 6-4 7-6(2) Sjeng Schalken #29 Match data
Feb 23, 2001* Rotterdam ATP 250 R16 Hard Alex Corretja #8 6-4 4-6 6-1 Sjeng Schalken #27 Match data
Aug 23, 1997* Boston ATP 250 QF Hard Sjeng Schalken #79 6-3 3-6 6-3 Alex Corretja #6 Match data
May 6, 1995* Munich ATP 250 QF Clay Alex Corretja #30 7-5 6-2 Sjeng Schalken #98 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Sjeng Schalken #677 #11 1,790 1,934 280 254 52.4% 0 0 0 0 9 9
Alex Corretja #1,110 #2 3,550 2,002 415 277 60.0% 0 2 1 0 14 17

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sjeng Schalken Alex Corretja
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1994 1–2 33.3% #148 1,501 0 0
18 1995 17–14 54.8% #69 1,645 0 1 1992 11–13 45.8% #86 1,566 0 0
19 1996 26–26 50.0% #65 1,687 0 2 1993 24–23 51.1% #76 1,658 0 0
20 1997 16–25 39.0% #59 1,632 0 3 1994 44–22 66.7% #22 1,848 0 1
21 1998 22–30 42.3% #66 1,592 0 3 1995 25–27 48.1% #48 1,714 0 1
22 1999 28–26 51.9% #44 1,744 0 4 1996 37–26 58.7% #23 1,783 0 1
23 2000 35–26 57.4% #22 1,824 0 5 1997 49–23 68.1% #12 1,822 0 4
24 2001 36–27 57.1% #26 1,846 0 6 1998 53–20 72.6% #3 1,962 0 9
25 2002 36–27 57.1% #20 1,839 0 7 1999 33–22 60.0% #26 1,771 0 9
26 2003 39–23 62.9% #18 1,826 0 9 2000 50–18 73.5% #8 1,940 0 14
27 2004 17–18 48.6% #57 1,698 0 9 2001 30–20 60.0% #16 1,781 0 15
28 2005 7–10 41.2% #230 1,664 0 9 2002 35–17 67.3% #19 1,851 0 17
29 2003 11–22 33.3% #100 1,650 0 17
30 2004 12–19 38.7% #114 1,623 0 17
31 2005 1–5 16.7% #525 1,571 0 17