H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Sjeng Schalken vs Byron Black H2H: 2-2
Sjeng Schalken and Byron Black are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Byron Black leads 1–0 on carpet, while Sjeng Schalken leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Byron Black won the 1998 Los Angeles third round 6-4 7-6(8).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 49
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
ZIM
Age 56
Right-Handed
175 cm / 5'9"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 30, 1998* | Los Angeles | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Byron Black | 6-4 7-6(8) | Sjeng Schalken | Match data |
| May 22, 1998* | St. Poelten | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Sjeng Schalken | 6-1 6-4 | Byron Black | Match data |
| Oct 12, 1996* | Beijing | ATP 250 | QF | Carpet | Byron Black | 7-6(3) 6-4 | Sjeng Schalken | Match data |
| Jun 13, 1996* | Rosmalen | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | Sjeng Schalken | 6-3 7-6(1) | Byron Black | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sjeng Schalken | #677 | #11 | 1,790 | 1,934 | 280 | 254 | 52.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 9 |
| Byron Black | #876 | #22 | 1,283 | 1,870 | 239 | 229 | 51.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sjeng Schalken | Byron Black | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1994 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #148 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1995 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #69 | 1,645 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1996 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #65 | 1,687 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1997 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #59 | 1,632 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1998 | 22–30 | 42.3% | #66 | 1,592 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 2–3 | 40.0% | #123 | 1,521 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1999 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #44 | 1,744 | 0 | 4 | 1992 | 10–18 | 35.7% | #142 | 1,544 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2000 | 35–26 | 57.4% | #22 | 1,824 | 0 | 5 | 1993 | 19–20 | 48.7% | #84 | 1,662 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2001 | 36–27 | 57.1% | #26 | 1,846 | 0 | 6 | 1994 | 22–26 | 45.8% | #66 | 1,732 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2002 | 36–27 | 57.1% | #20 | 1,839 | 0 | 7 | 1995 | 28–24 | 53.8% | #40 | 1,832 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2003 | 39–23 | 62.9% | #18 | 1,826 | 0 | 9 | 1996 | 34–26 | 56.7% | #44 | 1,747 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2004 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #57 | 1,698 | 0 | 9 | 1997 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #76 | 1,724 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 2005 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #230 | 1,664 | 0 | 9 | 1998 | 37–25 | 59.7% | #28 | 1,738 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 24–23 | 51.1% | #65 | 1,690 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 27–24 | 52.9% | #35 | 1,697 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 8–13 | 38.1% | #196 | 1,647 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #317 | 1,634 | 0 | 2 |