H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC

Sjeng Schalken vs Daniel Vacek H2H: 3-2

Sjeng Schalken holds a 3–2 lead over Daniel Vacek in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Sjeng Schalken won the 1999 Auckland fourth round 6-4 6-4.

NED Age 49 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
3 2
5 main draw meetings
CZE Age 55 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jan 15, 1999* Auckland ATP 250 R16 Hard Sjeng Schalken #74 6-4 6-4 Daniel Vacek #47 Match data
Aug 5, 1998* Canada Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Daniel Vacek #66 4-6 6-3 6-4 Sjeng Schalken #49 Match data
May 27, 1998* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Daniel Vacek #77 1-6 6-2 6-4 7-5 Sjeng Schalken #54 Match data
May 29, 1996* Roland Garros Grand Slam R128 Clay Sjeng Schalken #63 6-3 6-3 1-6 6-3 Daniel Vacek #37 Match data
Jun 9, 1994* Rosmalen ATP 250 R32 Grass Sjeng Schalken #330 6-4 6-4 Daniel Vacek #53 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Sjeng Schalken #677 #11 1,790 1,934 280 254 52.4% 0 0 0 0 9 9
Daniel Vacek #1,133 #26 1,151 1,818 170 219 43.7% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sjeng Schalken Daniel Vacek
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1994 1–2 33.3% #148 1,501 0 0
18 1995 17–14 54.8% #69 1,645 0 1
19 1996 26–26 50.0% #65 1,687 0 2
20 1997 16–25 39.0% #59 1,632 0 3 1991 1–3 25.0% #470 1,490 0 0
21 1998 22–30 42.3% #66 1,592 0 3
22 1999 28–26 51.9% #44 1,744 0 4 1993 13–22 37.1% #114 1,560 0 0
23 2000 35–26 57.4% #22 1,824 0 5 1994 25–27 48.1% #45 1,711 0 0
24 2001 36–27 57.1% #26 1,846 0 6 1995 30–31 49.2% #27 1,794 0 0
25 2002 36–27 57.1% #20 1,839 0 7 1996 22–28 44.0% #71 1,694 0 0
26 2003 39–23 62.9% #18 1,826 0 9 1997 19–26 42.2% #53 1,669 0 0
27 2004 17–18 48.6% #57 1,698 0 9 1998 25–29 46.3% #50 1,672 0 0
28 2005 7–10 41.2% #230 1,664 0 9 1999 29–31 48.3% #43 1,744 0 0
29 2000 4–13 23.5% #238 1,630 0 0
30 2001 2–7 22.2% #393 1,595 0 0
31 2002 0–2 0.0% #749 1,578 0 0