H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC

Sjeng Schalken vs Davide Sanguinetti H2H: 3-1

Sjeng Schalken holds a 3–1 lead over Davide Sanguinetti in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on grass, while Sjeng Schalken leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Davide Sanguinetti won the 2005 S Hertogenbosch fourth round 7-6(6) 6-3.

NED Age 49 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
3 1
4 main draw meetings
ITA Age 53 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 17, 2005* S Hertogenbosch ATP 250 R16 Grass Davide Sanguinetti #63 7-6(6) 6-3 Sjeng Schalken #89 Match data
Apr 16, 2003* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Sjeng Schalken #14 6-4 3-1 (ret.) Davide Sanguinetti #83 Match data
Jun 23, 1999* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Sjeng Schalken #50 5-7 6-4 6-7(5) 7-5 6-3 Davide Sanguinetti #76 Match data
Aug 27, 1998* Boston ATP 250 R32 Hard Sjeng Schalken #86 7-6(3) 7-6(3) Davide Sanguinetti #50 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Sjeng Schalken #677 #11 1,790 1,934 280 254 52.4% 0 0 0 0 9 9
Davide Sanguinetti #1,080 #42 874 1,771 157 233 40.3% 0 0 0 0 2 2

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sjeng Schalken Davide Sanguinetti
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1994 1–2 33.3% #148 1,501 0 0
18 1995 17–14 54.8% #69 1,645 0 1
19 1996 26–26 50.0% #65 1,687 0 2
20 1997 16–25 39.0% #59 1,632 0 3
21 1998 22–30 42.3% #66 1,592 0 3 1994 0–2 0.0% #177 1,482 0 0
22 1999 28–26 51.9% #44 1,744 0 4 1995 0–3 0.0% #290 1,455 0 0
23 2000 35–26 57.4% #22 1,824 0 5
24 2001 36–27 57.1% #26 1,846 0 6 1997 5–11 31.2% #95 1,497 0 0
25 2002 36–27 57.1% #20 1,839 0 7 1998 29–27 51.8% #48 1,675 0 0
26 2003 39–23 62.9% #18 1,826 0 9 1999 8–23 25.8% #120 1,560 0 0
27 2004 17–18 48.6% #57 1,698 0 9 2000 17–21 44.7% #65 1,639 0 0
28 2005 7–10 41.2% #230 1,664 0 9 2001 10–27 27.0% #91 1,528 0 0
29 2002 22–21 51.2% #46 1,620 0 2
30 2003 16–21 43.2% #65 1,620 0 2
31 2004 11–20 35.5% #110 1,588 0 2
32 2005 25–25 50.0% #44 1,710 0 2
33 2006 9–24 27.3% #107 1,547 0 2
34 2007 5–8 38.5% #270 1,519 0 2