H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Sjeng Schalken vs Karim Alami H2H: 3-1
Sjeng Schalken holds a 3–1 lead over Karim Alami in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on clay, while Sjeng Schalken leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Sjeng Schalken won the 2001 Monte Carlo Masters second round 6-2 6-0.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 49
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
3
–
1
4 main draw meetings
MAR
Age 53
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 18, 2001* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Sjeng Schalken | 6-2 6-0 | Karim Alami | Match data |
| Jan 4, 2001* | Doha | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Sjeng Schalken | 6-3 6-1 | Karim Alami | Match data |
| Apr 21, 1999* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Karim Alami | 6-2 6-3 | Sjeng Schalken | Match data |
| Jun 18, 1998* | S Hertogenbosch | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | Sjeng Schalken | 6-0 6-1 | Karim Alami | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sjeng Schalken | #677 | #11 | 1,790 | 1,934 | 280 | 254 | 52.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 9 |
| Karim Alami | #1,418 | #25 | 1,196 | 1,798 | 140 | 177 | 44.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sjeng Schalken | Karim Alami | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1994 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #148 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #340 | 1,488 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1995 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #69 | 1,645 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1996 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #65 | 1,687 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #437 | 1,463 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1997 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #59 | 1,632 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #205 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1998 | 22–30 | 42.3% | #66 | 1,592 | 0 | 3 | 1994 | 12–19 | 38.7% | #88 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1999 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #44 | 1,744 | 0 | 4 | 1995 | 15–14 | 51.7% | #73 | 1,615 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2000 | 35–26 | 57.4% | #22 | 1,824 | 0 | 5 | 1996 | 16–21 | 43.2% | #56 | 1,650 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2001 | 36–27 | 57.1% | #26 | 1,846 | 0 | 6 | 1997 | 23–27 | 46.0% | #55 | 1,619 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2002 | 36–27 | 57.1% | #20 | 1,839 | 0 | 7 | 1998 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #72 | 1,644 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2003 | 39–23 | 62.9% | #18 | 1,826 | 0 | 9 | 1999 | 26–22 | 54.2% | #31 | 1,734 | 0 | 2 |
| 27 | 2004 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #57 | 1,698 | 0 | 9 | 2000 | 21–28 | 42.9% | #57 | 1,601 | 0 | 2 |
| 28 | 2005 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #230 | 1,664 | 0 | 9 | 2001 | 5–17 | 22.7% | #203 | 1,512 | 0 | 2 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #479 | 1,523 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #990 | 1,510 | 0 | 2 |