H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Sjeng Schalken vs Kenneth Carlsen H2H: 2-0
Sjeng Schalken holds a 2–0 lead over Kenneth Carlsen in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Sjeng Schalken leads 2–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sjeng Schalken won the 2004 Australian Open first round 7-5 6-3 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 49
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
2
–
0
2 main draw meetings
DEN
Age 53
Left-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 21, 2004* | Australian Open | Grand Slam | R128 | Hard | Sjeng Schalken | 7-5 6-3 6-1 | Kenneth Carlsen | Match data |
| Feb 28, 1997* | Philadelphia | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Sjeng Schalken | 7-6(7) 4-6 6-3 | Kenneth Carlsen | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sjeng Schalken | #677 | #11 | 1,790 | 1,934 | 280 | 254 | 52.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 9 |
| Kenneth Carlsen | #1,158 | #41 | 791 | 1,754 | 239 | 273 | 46.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sjeng Schalken | Kenneth Carlsen | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1994 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #148 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1995 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #69 | 1,645 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1996 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #65 | 1,687 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 10–7 | 58.8% | #69 | 1,587 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1997 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #59 | 1,632 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 17–27 | 38.6% | #92 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1998 | 22–30 | 42.3% | #66 | 1,592 | 0 | 3 | 1994 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #108 | 1,625 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1999 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #44 | 1,744 | 0 | 4 | 1995 | 25–22 | 53.2% | #72 | 1,693 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2000 | 35–26 | 57.4% | #22 | 1,824 | 0 | 5 | 1996 | 17–22 | 43.6% | #73 | 1,620 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2001 | 36–27 | 57.1% | #26 | 1,846 | 0 | 6 | 1997 | 24–26 | 48.0% | #75 | 1,654 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2002 | 36–27 | 57.1% | #20 | 1,839 | 0 | 7 | 1998 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #83 | 1,621 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 2003 | 39–23 | 62.9% | #18 | 1,826 | 0 | 9 | 1999 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #85 | 1,657 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 2004 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #57 | 1,698 | 0 | 9 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 28 | 2005 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #230 | 1,664 | 0 | 9 | 2001 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #153 | 1,679 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 16–14 | 53.3% | #65 | 1,743 | 0 | 2 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 13–22 | 37.1% | #108 | 1,595 | 0 | 2 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 15–19 | 44.1% | #84 | 1,650 | 0 | 2 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 17–25 | 40.5% | #66 | 1,581 | 0 | 3 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 15–18 | 45.5% | #137 | 1,609 | 0 | 3 |
| 34 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2007 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #498 | 1,487 | 0 | 3 |