H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 17:48 UTC
Sjeng Schalken vs Marcelo Filippini H2H: 0-1
Marcelo Filippini holds a 1–0 lead over Sjeng Schalken in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Marcelo Filippini leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Marcelo Filippini won the 1995 Amsterdam third round 6-3 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 49
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
URU
Age 58
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 27, 1995* | Amsterdam | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Marcelo Filippini | 6-3 6-4 | Sjeng Schalken | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sjeng Schalken | #677 | #11 | 1,790 | 1,934 | 280 | 254 | 52.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 9 |
| Marcelo Filippini | #967 | #30 | 971 | 1,799 | 217 | 229 | 48.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 5 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sjeng Schalken | Marcelo Filippini | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1994 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #148 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1995 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #69 | 1,645 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1996 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #65 | 1,687 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #118 | 1,518 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1997 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #59 | 1,632 | 0 | 3 | 1988 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #53 | 1,670 | 0 | 1 |
| 21 | 1998 | 22–30 | 42.3% | #66 | 1,592 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 27–18 | 60.0% | #43 | 1,728 | 0 | 2 |
| 22 | 1999 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #44 | 1,744 | 0 | 4 | 1990 | 24–22 | 52.2% | #49 | 1,685 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2000 | 35–26 | 57.4% | #22 | 1,824 | 0 | 5 | 1991 | 9–21 | 30.0% | #107 | 1,528 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2001 | 36–27 | 57.1% | #26 | 1,846 | 0 | 6 | 1992 | 25–21 | 54.3% | #60 | 1,614 | 0 | 2 |
| 25 | 2002 | 36–27 | 57.1% | #20 | 1,839 | 0 | 7 | 1993 | 17–26 | 39.5% | #87 | 1,625 | 0 | 2 |
| 26 | 2003 | 39–23 | 62.9% | #18 | 1,826 | 0 | 9 | 1994 | 22–15 | 59.5% | #60 | 1,693 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2004 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #57 | 1,698 | 0 | 9 | 1995 | 15–20 | 42.9% | #101 | 1,674 | 0 | 3 |
| 28 | 2005 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #230 | 1,664 | 0 | 9 | 1996 | 13–14 | 48.1% | #81 | 1,659 | 0 | 3 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 26–21 | 55.3% | #44 | 1,697 | 0 | 5 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #135 | 1,592 | 0 | 5 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #106 | 1,586 | 0 | 5 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #775 | 1,560 | 0 | 5 |