H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC

Sjeng Schalken vs Marcelo Filippini H2H: 0-1

Marcelo Filippini holds a 1–0 lead over Sjeng Schalken in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Marcelo Filippini leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Marcelo Filippini won the 1995 Dutch Open round of 32 6-3 6-4.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sjeng Schalken
NED Age 49 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
0 – 1
1 main-draw meetings
Marcelo Filippini
URU Age 59 Right-Handed 178 cm / 5'10"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Marcelo Filippini #82 6-3 6-4 Sjeng Schalken #86 Match data Jul 27, 1995* R32 Dutch Open ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Sjeng Schalken #677 #11 1,790 1,928 280 254 52.4% 0 0 0 1 8 9
Marcelo Filippini #967 #30 971 1,796 218 230 48.7% 0 0 0 0 5 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sjeng Schalken Marcelo Filippini
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 1994 1–2 33.3% #148 1,501 0 0 — — — — — — —
18 1995 17–14 54.8% #69 1,645 0 1 — — — — — — —
19 1996 26–26 50.0% #65 1,687 0 2 1987 3–4 42.9% #118 1,518 0 0
20 1997 16–25 39.0% #59 1,633 0 3 1988 25–17 59.5% #53 1,671 0 1
21 1998 22–30 42.3% #66 1,598 0 3 1989 27–18 60.0% #43 1,729 0 2
22 1999 28–26 51.9% #44 1,744 0 4 1990 24–22 52.2% #49 1,686 0 2
23 2000 35–26 57.4% #22 1,823 0 5 1991 9–21 30.0% #107 1,529 0 2
24 2001 36–27 57.1% #26 1,837 0 6 1992 25–21 54.3% #60 1,614 0 2
25 2002 36–27 57.1% #20 1,839 0 7 1993 17–26 39.5% #87 1,625 0 2
26 2003 39–23 62.9% #18 1,822 0 9 1994 22–15 59.5% #60 1,694 0 3
27 2004 17–18 48.6% #57 1,698 0 9 1995 15–20 42.9% #101 1,655 0 3
28 2005 7–10 41.2% #230 1,663 0 9 1996 14–15 48.3% #81 1,651 0 3
29 — — — — — — — 1997 26–21 55.3% #44 1,697 0 5
30 — — — — — — — 1998 5–16 23.8% #135 1,595 0 5
31 — — — — — — — 1999 6–12 33.3% #106 1,587 0 5
32 — — — — — — — 2000 0–2 0.0% #775 1,561 0 5

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Sjeng Schalken Marcelo Filippini
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 1994 — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1995 0 2 2 0.0% 14 8 22 63.6% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1996 10 10 20 50.0% 10 10 20 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1987 2 1 3 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — — — — — —
20 1997 11 11 22 50.0% 3 6 9 33.3% 2 3 5 40.0% 0 5 5 0.0% 1988 2 5 7 28.6% 23 12 35 65.7% — — — — — — — —
21 1998 11 15 26 42.3% 5 8 13 38.5% 2 3 5 40.0% 4 4 8 50.0% 1989 4 3 7 57.1% 21 14 35 60.0% — — — — 2 1 3 66.7%
22 1999 17 16 33 51.5% 3 5 8 37.5% 5 3 8 62.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 1990 6 7 13 46.2% 18 13 31 58.1% — — — — 0 2 2 0.0%
23 2000 28 17 45 62.2% 4 6 10 40.0% 3 3 6 50.0% — — — — 1991 0 6 6 0.0% 9 14 23 39.1% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
24 2001 21 15 36 58.3% 8 6 14 57.1% 4 3 7 57.1% 3 3 6 50.0% 1992 3 3 6 50.0% 22 18 40 55.0% — — — — — — — —
25 2002 12 16 28 42.9% 5 6 11 45.5% 12 2 14 85.7% 7 3 10 70.0% 1993 2 5 7 28.6% 14 20 34 41.2% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0%
26 2003 23 13 36 63.9% 6 5 11 54.5% 10 2 12 83.3% 0 3 3 0.0% 1994 — — — — 22 15 37 59.5% — — — — — — — —
27 2004 11 12 23 47.8% 1 3 4 25.0% 5 3 8 62.5% — — — — 1995 1 3 4 25.0% 14 16 30 46.7% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
28 2005 3 6 9 33.3% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 1996 2 3 5 40.0% 12 12 24 50.0% — — — — — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1 6 7 14.3% 25 14 39 64.1% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 2 7 9 22.2% 3 8 11 27.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 0 2 2 0.0% 6 9 15 40.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
Career — 147 133 280 52.5% 61 66 127 48.0% 47 30 77 61.0% 25 25 50 50.0% — 25 51 76 32.9% 190 170 360 52.8% 0 3 3 0.0% 3 6 9 33.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 466/534 of Sjeng Schalken's and 272/308 of Marcelo Filippini's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Sjeng Schalken Marcelo Filippini
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 1994 3/3 3.0 3.7 61.3% 70.8% 53.2% 74.5% 29.2% 64.2% 32.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
18 1995 29/31 4.6 4.3 60.7% 70.0% 46.7% 57.7% 43.2% 60.7% 38.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 1996 44/52 4.6 4.8 56.9% 70.5% 48.1% 62.4% 44.7% 60.7% 36.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 1997 33/41 4.2 4.4 58.4% 67.0% 50.3% 56.9% 42.2% 59.7% 35.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
21 1998 41/52 4.3 3.3 59.6% 69.6% 49.3% 59.2% 45.2% 61.2% 37.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
22 1999 46/54 3.5 3.6 62.0% 69.6% 46.4% 53.6% 48.0% 60.6% 40.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
23 2000 53/61 5.3 4.5 56.0% 72.1% 51.2% 57.8% 41.9% 62.7% 38.7% 1991 27/30 1.2 1.3 65.4% 61.4% 43.6% 49.7% 50.0% 55.2% 40.2%
24 2001 53/63 4.0 3.5 60.9% 70.2% 53.1% 54.8% 45.9% 63.4% 40.6% 1992 43/46 1.9 2.0 64.9% 66.3% 53.9% 54.1% 43.3% 61.7% 40.6%
25 2002 52/63 3.1 2.8 66.8% 69.0% 52.9% 53.7% 39.0% 63.6% 38.3% 1993 39/43 1.5 2.2 62.8% 63.0% 50.3% 52.5% 43.2% 57.9% 39.3%
26 2003 60/62 2.7 2.0 67.1% 69.2% 56.7% 56.1% 51.7% 64.7% 40.7% 1994 32/37 1.7 1.9 65.4% 66.9% 52.6% 66.6% 39.0% 61.6% 42.6%
27 2004 35/35 2.6 1.6 73.8% 65.8% 54.7% 55.7% 37.5% 62.8% 36.1% 1995 33/35 1.7 1.4 64.7% 61.5% 51.1% 55.2% 42.9% 57.5% 40.4%
28 2005 17/17 1.5 1.6 71.1% 61.8% 51.4% 55.1% 41.2% 58.8% 38.4% 1996 24/29 1.8 2.3 68.7% 64.5% 46.1% 61.0% 42.9% 58.3% 38.5%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1997 40/47 2.3 2.2 67.7% 65.3% 50.1% 61.2% 39.3% 60.3% 41.6%
30 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1998 17/21 1.9 1.2 67.5% 58.1% 55.1% 58.9% 41.0% 56.9% 37.1%
31 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 1999 15/18 1.8 1.9 65.1% 62.1% 53.4% 58.1% 34.6% 58.8% 35.1%
32 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2000 2/2 2.0 1.5 61.7% 52.1% 45.1% 57.5% 33.3% 50.2% 31.1%
Career — 466/534 3.8 3.4 62.5% 69.2% 51.3% 56.7% 44.1% 62.1% 38.5% — 272/448 1.8 1.9 65.6% 63.7% 50.6% 57.2% 42.1% 58.9% 40.0%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Sjeng Schalken Marcelo Filippini
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
17 1994 1502 103.3 +0.17 -1.45 0.912 48.2% — — — 42.9% -0.57 0–1 — — +0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1995 1646 131.2 +0.48 -0.33 0.990 49.8% -114 +64 -77 50.0% -0.04 9–4 (69%) 6–3 (67%) 108.9 +0.54 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1996 1688 137.5 -0.72 -1.26 0.929 49.0% -25 +3 -110 50.4% -0.08 10–8 (56%) 6–13 (32%) 100.0 +0.30 1987 1518 107.4 — — — — +41 -3 — 43.8% -0.25 1–1 2–1 (67%) — +0.47
20 1997 1634 136.5 -1.45 -0.70 0.889 47.9% +9 +9 -55 43.8% -0.37 5–7 (42%) 8–10 (44%) 99.7 -1.14 1988 1671 133.3 — — — — -161 +100 — 54.1% +0.21 11–4 (73%) 1–5 (17%) 104.7 +3.29
21 1998 1598 132.0 -0.55 +0.75 0.978 50.0% +23 +20 -38 44.9% -0.20 8–13 (38%) 12–11 (52%) 93.5 +1.65 1989 1729 135.8 — — — — -148 +37 — 57.4% +0.51 9–8 (53%) 8–7 (53%) 101.8 +0.28
22 1999 1745 148.3 -0.52 +2.39 1.015 50.3% -3 -76 -122 51.7% +0.08 8–12 (40%) 9–8 (53%) 98.1 -2.44 1990 1686 137.7 — — — — -100 +130 — 51.8% +0.01 8–10 (44%) 9–6 (60%) 98.0 +1.21
23 2000 1823 145.8 +1.00 +1.26 1.036 50.5% +28 -171 -172 55.8% +0.34 12–9 (57%) 9–6 (60%) 105.1 +0.15 1991 1529 122.9 -2.90 -0.16 0.896 47.8% -42 +140 — 37.1% -1.03 3–9 (25%) 2–3 (40%) 91.1 +1.17
24 2001 1838 142.0 +0.82 +2.43 1.108 51.7% -14 -117 -151 53.6% +0.32 14–11 (56%) 7–13 (35%) 99.3 +1.67 1992 1615 122.2 +0.74 +1.05 1.060 50.6% -110 +68 — 51.9% -0.08 8–8 (50%) 7–7 (50%) 98.4 +1.92
25 2002 1839 143.2 +1.06 +1.20 1.052 50.5% -32 -125 +41 55.2% +0.36 11–7 (61%) 17–18 (49%) 102.6 +0.32 1993 1626 136.6 -1.56 +0.94 0.933 48.4% -110 +40 — 41.0% -0.71 5–12 (29%) 8–2 (80%) 98.1 -1.65
26 2003 1822 140.9 +2.08 +3.20 1.152 52.4% -22 -111 +167 61.2% +0.65 6–6 (50%) 13–4 (76%) 102.4 +1.00 1994 1694 134.3 +1.16 +1.97 1.108 52.0% — +45 — 58.8% +0.64 5–5 (50%) 4–6 (40%) 97.4 +1.01
27 2004 1698 129.8 -0.34 -0.21 0.972 49.3% -14 -22 +251 53.7% +0.41 4–3 (57%) 5–5 (50%) 97.3 +1.66 1995 1656 137.9 -1.72 +1.65 0.949 48.8% -145 +40 — 42.9% -0.62 3–8 (27%) 7–4 (64%) 98.0 -1.99
28 2005 1664 127.0 -2.29 +0.67 0.930 48.5% +5 +11 — 41.5% -0.51 3–3 (50%) 1–3 (25%) 99.0 -1.00 1996 1651 129.2 -1.87 -0.24 0.923 48.6% -143 +53 — 48.6% -0.14 9–8 (53%) 5–3 (63%) 102.6 -0.79
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1997 1697 138.8 -0.69 +3.04 1.050 51.0% -192 +70 — 52.7% +0.19 7–5 (58%) 11–9 (55%) 102.3 -1.20
30 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1998 1595 122.2 -3.06 -0.89 0.862 47.3% -82 +80 — 35.1% -1.14 1–7 (13%) 6–3 (67%) 98.1 -0.79
31 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1999 1587 116.2 -1.89 -0.86 0.852 47.2% — +71 — 40.0% -0.91 0–3 (0%) 1–1 — -1.15
32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2000 1561 102.2 -1.71 -3.38 0.625 42.0% — — — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.08
Career — 1928 144.9 +0.24 +1.08 1.018 50.3% -6 -38 +4 52.2% +0.15 90–84 (52%) 93–94 (50%) 100.6 +0.52 — 1796 138.0 -1.04 +1.01 0.973 49.4% -114 +70 — 48.6% -0.17 70–88 (44%) 71–57 (55%) 98.8 +0.38

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.