H2H data updated: 2026-07-17 14:15 UTC
Sjeng Schalken vs Petr Korda H2H: 1-0
Sjeng Schalken holds a 1–0 lead over Petr Korda in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Sjeng Schalken leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Sjeng Schalken won the 1995 Munich third round 6-4 3-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 49
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CZE
Age 58
Left-Handed
190 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 4, 1995* | Munich | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Sjeng Schalken | 6-4 3-6 6-3 | Petr Korda | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sjeng Schalken | #677 | #11 | 1,790 | 1,934 | 280 | 254 | 52.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 9 |
| Petr Korda | #1,382 | #2 | 3,499 | 2,110 | 378 | 238 | 61.4% | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 10 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sjeng Schalken | Petr Korda | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1994 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #148 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #794 | 1,489 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1995 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #69 | 1,645 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1996 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #65 | 1,687 | 0 | 2 | 1987 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #87 | 1,527 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1997 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #59 | 1,632 | 0 | 3 | 1988 | 6–13 | 31.6% | #188 | 1,530 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1998 | 22–30 | 42.3% | #66 | 1,592 | 0 | 3 | 1989 | 13–8 | 61.9% | #59 | 1,690 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1999 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #44 | 1,744 | 0 | 4 | 1990 | 23–26 | 46.9% | #38 | 1,729 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2000 | 35–26 | 57.4% | #22 | 1,824 | 0 | 5 | 1991 | 44–22 | 66.7% | #9 | 1,922 | 0 | 2 |
| 24 | 2001 | 36–27 | 57.1% | #26 | 1,846 | 0 | 6 | 1992 | 57–28 | 67.1% | #7 | 1,940 | 0 | 5 |
| 25 | 2002 | 36–27 | 57.1% | #20 | 1,839 | 0 | 7 | 1993 | 50–23 | 68.5% | #12 | 1,954 | 0 | 6 |
| 26 | 2003 | 39–23 | 62.9% | #18 | 1,826 | 0 | 9 | 1994 | 33–20 | 62.3% | #18 | 1,838 | 0 | 6 |
| 27 | 2004 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #57 | 1,698 | 0 | 9 | 1995 | 25–23 | 52.1% | #41 | 1,801 | 0 | 6 |
| 28 | 2005 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #230 | 1,664 | 0 | 9 | 1996 | 36–17 | 67.9% | #24 | 1,904 | 0 | 7 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 52–24 | 68.4% | #13 | 1,976 | 0 | 8 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 31–20 | 60.8% | #13 | 1,777 | 1 | 10 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 6–12 | 33.3% | #170 | 1,674 | 1 | 10 |