H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Sjeng Schalken vs Ramon Delgado H2H: 0-1
Ramon Delgado holds a 1–0 lead over Sjeng Schalken in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Ramon Delgado leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Ramon Delgado won the 1997 Roland Garros first round 2-6 7-6(2) 7-5 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 49
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
PAR
Age 49
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 28, 1997* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R128 | Clay | Ramon Delgado | 2-6 7-6(2) 7-5 6-4 | Sjeng Schalken | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sjeng Schalken | #677 | #11 | 1,790 | 1,934 | 280 | 254 | 52.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 9 |
| Ramon Delgado | #518 | #52 | 829 | 1,712 | 69 | 102 | 40.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sjeng Schalken | Ramon Delgado | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1994 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #148 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1995 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #69 | 1,645 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1996 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #65 | 1,687 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #289 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1997 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #59 | 1,632 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 2–6 | 25.0% | #114 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1998 | 22–30 | 42.3% | #66 | 1,592 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 22–22 | 50.0% | #56 | 1,681 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1999 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #44 | 1,744 | 0 | 4 | 1999 | 11–21 | 34.4% | #149 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2000 | 35–26 | 57.4% | #22 | 1,824 | 0 | 5 | 2000 | 3–1 | 75.0% | #257 | 1,584 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 2001 | 36–27 | 57.1% | #26 | 1,846 | 0 | 6 | 2001 | 8–7 | 53.3% | #92 | 1,639 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2002 | 36–27 | 57.1% | #20 | 1,839 | 0 | 7 | 2002 | 8–20 | 28.6% | #123 | 1,601 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2003 | 39–23 | 62.9% | #18 | 1,826 | 0 | 9 | 2003 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #200 | 1,663 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2004 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #57 | 1,698 | 0 | 9 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #227 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2005 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #230 | 1,664 | 0 | 9 | 2005 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #131 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 6–9 | 40.0% | #156 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2008 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #264 | 1,575 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2009 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #203 | 1,570 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2010 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #194 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |