H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 02:15 UTC
Sjeng Schalken vs Richard Fromberg H2H: 1-0
Sjeng Schalken holds a 1–0 lead over Richard Fromberg in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Sjeng Schalken leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sjeng Schalken won the 1998 Scottsdale fourth round 4-6 7-6(5) 7-6(0).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 49
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
AUS
Age 56
Right-Handed
196 cm / 6'5"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 6, 1998* | Scottsdale | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Sjeng Schalken | 4-6 7-6(5) 7-6(0) | Richard Fromberg | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sjeng Schalken | #677 | #11 | 1,790 | 1,934 | 280 | 254 | 52.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 9 |
| Richard Fromberg | #997 | #24 | 1,214 | 1,823 | 247 | 282 | 46.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sjeng Schalken | Richard Fromberg | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1994 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #148 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1995 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #69 | 1,645 | 0 | 1 | 1988 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #103 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1996 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #65 | 1,687 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 7–13 | 35.0% | #126 | 1,548 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1997 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #59 | 1,632 | 0 | 3 | 1990 | 29–21 | 58.0% | #32 | 1,662 | 0 | 2 |
| 21 | 1998 | 22–30 | 42.3% | #66 | 1,592 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #95 | 1,643 | 0 | 3 |
| 22 | 1999 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #44 | 1,744 | 0 | 4 | 1992 | 14–22 | 38.9% | #83 | 1,638 | 0 | 3 |
| 23 | 2000 | 35–26 | 57.4% | #22 | 1,824 | 0 | 5 | 1993 | 34–30 | 53.1% | #40 | 1,680 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2001 | 36–27 | 57.1% | #26 | 1,846 | 0 | 6 | 1994 | 25–28 | 47.2% | #58 | 1,695 | 0 | 3 |
| 25 | 2002 | 36–27 | 57.1% | #20 | 1,839 | 0 | 7 | 1995 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #85 | 1,673 | 0 | 3 |
| 26 | 2003 | 39–23 | 62.9% | #18 | 1,826 | 0 | 9 | 1996 | 18–21 | 46.2% | #76 | 1,633 | 0 | 3 |
| 27 | 2004 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #57 | 1,698 | 0 | 9 | 1997 | 19–25 | 43.2% | #77 | 1,671 | 0 | 4 |
| 28 | 2005 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #230 | 1,664 | 0 | 9 | 1998 | 26–31 | 45.6% | #40 | 1,598 | 0 | 4 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 15–16 | 48.4% | #78 | 1,666 | 0 | 4 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #84 | 1,633 | 0 | 4 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 1–8 | 11.1% | #309 | 1,502 | 0 | 4 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #727 | 1,486 | 0 | 4 |