H2H data updated: 2026-07-19 02:51 UTC
Sjeng Schalken vs Sergi Bruguera H2H: 1-1
Sjeng Schalken and Sergi Bruguera are tied 1–1 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, they are tied 1–1 on hard courts. Most recently, Sjeng Schalken won the 2000 Tokyo third round 6-4 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 49
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1
–
1
2 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 55
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 12, 2000* | Tokyo | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Sjeng Schalken | 6-4 6-2 | Sergi Bruguera | Match data |
| Oct 17, 1996* | Toulouse | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Sergi Bruguera | 4-6 7-6(3) 7-6(3) | Sjeng Schalken | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sjeng Schalken | #677 | #11 | 1,790 | 1,934 | 280 | 254 | 52.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 9 |
| Sergi Bruguera | #668 | #3 | 3,007 | 2,101 | 414 | 255 | 61.9% | 2 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 10 | 14 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sjeng Schalken | Sergi Bruguera | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1994 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #148 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #333 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1995 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #69 | 1,645 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 23–13 | 63.9% | #26 | 1,685 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1996 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #65 | 1,687 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #28 | 1,785 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1997 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #59 | 1,632 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 49–22 | 69.0% | #11 | 1,831 | 0 | 3 |
| 21 | 1998 | 22–30 | 42.3% | #66 | 1,592 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 41–19 | 68.3% | #16 | 1,858 | 0 | 6 |
| 22 | 1999 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #44 | 1,744 | 0 | 4 | 1993 | 60–23 | 72.3% | #4 | 1,915 | 1 | 11 |
| 23 | 2000 | 35–26 | 57.4% | #22 | 1,824 | 0 | 5 | 1994 | 60–23 | 72.3% | #4 | 1,939 | 2 | 14 |
| 24 | 2001 | 36–27 | 57.1% | #26 | 1,846 | 0 | 6 | 1995 | 35–19 | 64.8% | #13 | 1,842 | 2 | 14 |
| 25 | 2002 | 36–27 | 57.1% | #20 | 1,839 | 0 | 7 | 1996 | 19–19 | 50.0% | #82 | 1,756 | 2 | 14 |
| 26 | 2003 | 39–23 | 62.9% | #18 | 1,826 | 0 | 9 | 1997 | 49–28 | 63.6% | #8 | 1,786 | 2 | 14 |
| 27 | 2004 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #57 | 1,698 | 0 | 9 | 1998 | 12–24 | 33.3% | #132 | 1,610 | 2 | 14 |
| 28 | 2005 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #230 | 1,664 | 0 | 9 | 1999 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #376 | 1,595 | 2 | 14 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 17–15 | 53.1% | #85 | 1,662 | 2 | 14 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 15–21 | 41.7% | #108 | 1,577 | 2 | 14 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #290 | 1,553 | 2 | 14 |