H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Sjeng Schalken vs Thomas Enqvist H2H: 3-3

Sjeng Schalken and Thomas Enqvist are tied 3–3 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 6 main-draw meetings, Thomas Enqvist leads 2–0 on carpet, while Sjeng Schalken leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Sjeng Schalken won the 2004 Wimbledon third round 5-7 6-2 3-6 7-6(8) 6-2.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Sjeng Schalken
NED Age 49 Right-Handed 193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
3 – 3
6 main draw meetings
Thomas Enqvist
SWE Age 52 Right-Handed 190 cm / 6'3"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 27, 2004* Wimbledon Grand Slam R32 Grass Sjeng Schalken #23 5-7 6-2 3-6 7-6(8) 6-2 Thomas Enqvist #57 Match data
Jan 30, 2003* Milan ATP 250 R32 Carpet Thomas Enqvist #47 6-4 6-3 Sjeng Schalken #17 Match data
Apr 19, 2001* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Sjeng Schalken #30 2-6 6-4 6-2 Thomas Enqvist #14 Match data
Aug 2, 2000* Canada Masters Masters 1000 R64 Hard Thomas Enqvist #7 7-5 6-4 Sjeng Schalken #52 Match data
Oct 16, 1997* Lyon ATP 250 R32 Carpet Thomas Enqvist #17 4-6 6-3 6-3 Sjeng Schalken #57 Match data
Apr 25, 1996* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Sjeng Schalken #65 3-6 6-3 6-3 Thomas Enqvist #7 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Sjeng Schalken #677 #11 1,790 1,934 280 254 52.4% 0 0 0 0 9 9
Thomas Enqvist #548 #4 2,693 2,013 422 281 60.0% 0 3 0 0 16 19

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Sjeng Schalken Thomas Enqvist
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1989 0–1 0.0% #1103 1,484 0 0
16 — — — — — — — 1990 0–1 0.0% #472 1,480 0 0
17 1994 1–2 33.3% #148 1,501 0 0 1991 1–5 16.7% #231 1,467 0 0
18 1995 17–14 54.8% #69 1,645 0 1 1992 16–9 64.0% #63 1,734 0 1
19 1996 26–26 50.0% #65 1,687 0 2 1993 18–23 43.9% #88 1,712 0 2
20 1997 16–25 39.0% #59 1,632 0 3 1994 23–19 54.8% #59 1,761 0 2
21 1998 22–30 42.3% #66 1,592 0 3 1995 63–22 74.1% #7 1,982 0 7
22 1999 28–26 51.9% #44 1,744 0 4 1996 49–25 66.2% #9 1,980 0 10
23 2000 35–26 57.4% #22 1,824 0 5 1997 35–21 62.5% #28 1,873 0 11
24 2001 36–27 57.1% #26 1,846 0 6 1998 35–15 70.0% #22 1,869 0 13
25 2002 36–27 57.1% #20 1,839 0 7 1999 45–25 64.3% #4 1,913 0 16
26 2003 39–23 62.9% #18 1,826 0 9 2000 51–23 68.9% #9 1,906 0 18
27 2004 17–18 48.6% #57 1,698 0 9 2001 31–21 59.6% #24 1,848 0 18
28 2005 7–10 41.2% #230 1,664 0 9 2002 23–17 57.5% #44 1,792 0 19
29 — — — — — — — 2003 13–23 36.1% #96 1,710 0 19
30 — — — — — — — 2004 12–19 38.7% #72 1,627 0 19
31 — — — — — — — 2005 7–12 36.8% #133 1,589 0 19