H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Sjeng Schalken vs Todd Martin H2H: 2-1
Sjeng Schalken holds a 2–1 lead over Todd Martin in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Sjeng Schalken leads 2–0 on grass, while Todd Martin leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sjeng Schalken won the 2004 Wimbledon second round 6-3 6-2 4-6 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 49
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
2
–
1
3 main draw meetings
USA
Age 56
Right-Handed
198 cm / 6'6"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 25, 2004* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R64 | Grass | Sjeng Schalken | 6-3 6-2 4-6 6-3 | Todd Martin | Match data |
| Jun 12, 2003* | Queen's Club | ATP 250 | R32 | Grass | Sjeng Schalken | (w/o) | Todd Martin | Match data |
| Aug 10, 2000* | Cincinnati Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Todd Martin | 6-4 6-4 | Sjeng Schalken | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sjeng Schalken | #677 | #11 | 1,790 | 1,934 | 280 | 254 | 52.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 9 |
| Todd Martin | #145 | #4 | 2,969 | 2,063 | 398 | 222 | 64.2% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 8 | 8 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sjeng Schalken | Todd Martin | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1994 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #148 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1995 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #69 | 1,645 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1996 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #65 | 1,687 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #269 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1997 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #59 | 1,632 | 0 | 3 | 1991 | 10–8 | 55.6% | #134 | 1,648 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1998 | 22–30 | 42.3% | #66 | 1,592 | 0 | 3 | 1992 | 22–19 | 53.7% | #87 | 1,724 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1999 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #44 | 1,744 | 0 | 4 | 1993 | 45–23 | 66.2% | #13 | 1,886 | 0 | 1 |
| 23 | 2000 | 35–26 | 57.4% | #22 | 1,824 | 0 | 5 | 1994 | 50–19 | 72.5% | #10 | 1,943 | 0 | 3 |
| 24 | 2001 | 36–27 | 57.1% | #26 | 1,846 | 0 | 6 | 1995 | 45–21 | 68.2% | #18 | 1,912 | 0 | 4 |
| 25 | 2002 | 36–27 | 57.1% | #20 | 1,839 | 0 | 7 | 1996 | 49–20 | 71.0% | #12 | 1,926 | 0 | 5 |
| 26 | 2003 | 39–23 | 62.9% | #18 | 1,826 | 0 | 9 | 1997 | 13–7 | 65.0% | #81 | 1,914 | 0 | 5 |
| 27 | 2004 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #57 | 1,698 | 0 | 9 | 1998 | 43–20 | 68.3% | #16 | 1,998 | 0 | 7 |
| 28 | 2005 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #230 | 1,664 | 0 | 9 | 1999 | 42–17 | 71.2% | #7 | 1,914 | 0 | 8 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 14–11 | 56.0% | #55 | 1,887 | 0 | 8 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2001 | 13–11 | 54.2% | #57 | 1,823 | 0 | 8 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2002 | 24–16 | 60.0% | #47 | 1,788 | 0 | 8 |
| 32 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2003 | 15–11 | 57.7% | #68 | 1,828 | 0 | 8 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 10–15 | 40.0% | #145 | 1,684 | 0 | 8 |