H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Sjeng Schalken vs Tomas Behrend H2H: 1-0
Sjeng Schalken holds a 1–0 lead over Tomas Behrend in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Sjeng Schalken leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Sjeng Schalken won the 2000 Auckland fourth round 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
NED
Age 49
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
GER
Age 51
Right-Handed
193 cm / 6'4"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 14, 2000* | Auckland | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Sjeng Schalken | 6-4 6-1 | Tomas Behrend | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sjeng Schalken | #677 | #11 | 1,790 | 1,934 | 280 | 254 | 52.4% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 9 | 9 |
| Tomas Behrend | #1,008 | #74 | 515 | 1,676 | 41 | 72 | 36.3% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Sjeng Schalken | Tomas Behrend | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1994 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #148 | 1,501 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1995 | 17–14 | 54.8% | #69 | 1,645 | 0 | 1 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 1996 | 26–26 | 50.0% | #65 | 1,687 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | 1997 | 16–25 | 39.0% | #59 | 1,632 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1998 | 22–30 | 42.3% | #66 | 1,592 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | 1999 | 28–26 | 51.9% | #44 | 1,744 | 0 | 4 | 1997 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #281 | 1,513 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 2000 | 35–26 | 57.4% | #22 | 1,824 | 0 | 5 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 24 | 2001 | 36–27 | 57.1% | #26 | 1,846 | 0 | 6 | 1999 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #119 | 1,523 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2002 | 36–27 | 57.1% | #20 | 1,839 | 0 | 7 | 2000 | 7–11 | 38.9% | #142 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2003 | 39–23 | 62.9% | #18 | 1,826 | 0 | 9 | 2001 | 5–8 | 38.5% | #129 | 1,611 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2004 | 17–18 | 48.6% | #57 | 1,698 | 0 | 9 | 2002 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #155 | 1,636 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2005 | 7–10 | 41.2% | #230 | 1,664 | 0 | 9 | 2003 | 11–13 | 45.8% | #87 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 5–10 | 33.3% | #139 | 1,532 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2005 | 7–14 | 33.3% | #89 | 1,573 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 4–12 | 25.0% | #204 | 1,455 | 0 | 0 |