H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Slava Dosedel vs Adrian Voinea H2H: 0-2
Adrian Voinea holds a 2–0 lead over Slava Dosedel in their ATP head-to-head. Across 2 main-draw meetings, Adrian Voinea leads 2–0 on clay. Most recently, Adrian Voinea won the 2001 Umag third round 6-1 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
0
–
2
2 main draw meetings
ROU
Age 51
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 19, 2001* | Umag | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Adrian Voinea | 6-1 6-4 | Slava Dosedel | Match data |
| Aug 3, 1996* | Amsterdam | ATP 250 | QF | Clay | Adrian Voinea | 7-6(7) 7-5 | Slava Dosedel | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Slava Dosedel | #1,027 | #26 | 1,122 | 1,825 | 190 | 184 | 50.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Adrian Voinea | #1,046 | #36 | 957 | 1,756 | 126 | 168 | 42.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Slava Dosedel | Adrian Voinea | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1989 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #265 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | 1994 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #202 | 1,492 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #146 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 1995 | 13–19 | 40.6% | #56 | 1,566 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #201 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 | 1996 | 28–25 | 52.8% | #45 | 1,709 | 0 | 0 |
| 1992 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #159 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 1997 | 12–20 | 37.5% | #139 | 1,628 | 0 | 0 |
| 1993 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #68 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | 1998 | 11–9 | 55.0% | #71 | 1,675 | 0 | 0 |
| 1994 | 36–23 | 61.0% | #29 | 1,731 | 0 | 0 | 1999 | 14–21 | 40.0% | #100 | 1,651 | 0 | 1 |
| 1995 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #60 | 1,695 | 0 | 1 | 2000 | 9–20 | 31.0% | #110 | 1,552 | 0 | 1 |
| 1996 | 21–13 | 61.8% | #66 | 1,769 | 0 | 2 | 2001 | 11–11 | 50.0% | #97 | 1,624 | 0 | 1 |
| 1997 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #43 | 1,762 | 0 | 3 | 2002 | 18–20 | 47.4% | #68 | 1,636 | 0 | 1 |
| 1998 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #64 | 1,690 | 0 | 3 | 2003 | 8–19 | 29.6% | #154 | 1,532 | 0 | 1 |
| 1999 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #63 | 1,741 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2000 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #64 | 1,722 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2001 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #152 | 1,575 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |