H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Slava Dosedel vs Carlos Costa H2H: 2-2
Slava Dosedel and Carlos Costa are tied 2–2 in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, they are tied 2–2 on clay. Most recently, Slava Dosedel won the 1998 Mallorca third round 6-4 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2
–
2
4 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 58
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 1, 1998* | Mallorca | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Slava Dosedel | 6-4 6-3 | Carlos Costa | Match data |
| Aug 2, 1996* | Amsterdam | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Slava Dosedel | 6-2 7-5 | Carlos Costa | Match data |
| May 5, 1994* | Hamburg Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Clay | Carlos Costa | 7-5 6-4 | Slava Dosedel | Match data |
| Aug 6, 1993* | Prague | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Carlos Costa | 7-6(5) 6-4 | Slava Dosedel | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Slava Dosedel | #1,027 | #26 | 1,122 | 1,825 | 190 | 184 | 50.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Carlos Costa | #1,297 | #10 | 1,663 | 1,960 | 237 | 201 | 54.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Slava Dosedel | Carlos Costa | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1989 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #265 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #243 | 1,524 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #146 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #201 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #201 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #151 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 1992 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #159 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 1991 | 15–13 | 53.6% | #55 | 1,659 | 0 | 0 |
| 1993 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #68 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | 1992 | 39–21 | 65.0% | #14 | 1,761 | 0 | 2 |
| 1994 | 36–23 | 61.0% | #29 | 1,731 | 0 | 0 | 1993 | 42–23 | 64.6% | #26 | 1,872 | 0 | 4 |
| 1995 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #60 | 1,695 | 0 | 1 | 1994 | 35–26 | 57.4% | #27 | 1,675 | 0 | 6 |
| 1996 | 21–13 | 61.8% | #66 | 1,769 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 29–22 | 56.9% | #31 | 1,756 | 0 | 6 |
| 1997 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #43 | 1,762 | 0 | 3 | 1996 | 25–24 | 51.0% | #61 | 1,659 | 0 | 6 |
| 1998 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #64 | 1,690 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 20–23 | 46.5% | #56 | 1,629 | 0 | 6 |
| 1999 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #63 | 1,741 | 0 | 3 | 1998 | 21–24 | 46.7% | #67 | 1,570 | 0 | 6 |
| 2000 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #64 | 1,722 | 0 | 3 | 1999 | 1–10 | 9.1% | #472 | 1,474 | 0 | 6 |
| 2001 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #152 | 1,575 | 0 | 3 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |