H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Slava Dosedel vs Javier Sanchez H2H: 1-3
Javier Sanchez holds a 3–1 lead over Slava Dosedel in their ATP head-to-head. Across 4 main-draw meetings, Javier Sanchez leads 3–0 on clay, while Slava Dosedel leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Javier Sanchez won the 1995 Munich third round 6-2 6-7(4) 6-3.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
CZE
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1
–
3
4 main draw meetings
ESP
Age 58
Right-Handed
177 cm / 5'10"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 4, 1995* | Munich | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Javier Sanchez | 6-2 6-7(4) 6-3 | Slava Dosedel | Match data |
| Apr 1, 1994* | Estoril | ATP 250 | R16 | Clay | Javier Sanchez | 7-6(5) 6-4 | Slava Dosedel | Match data |
| Feb 5, 1993* | Dubai | ATP 250 | R16 | Hard | Slava Dosedel | 6-3 6-2 | Javier Sanchez | Match data |
| Oct 4, 1990* | Athens | ATP 250 | R32 | Clay | Javier Sanchez | 6-7 6-2 6-3 | Slava Dosedel | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Slava Dosedel | #1,027 | #26 | 1,122 | 1,825 | 190 | 184 | 50.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 3 |
| Javier Sanchez | #957 | #23 | 1,256 | 1,847 | 321 | 328 | 49.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 4 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Slava Dosedel | Javier Sanchez | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 1989 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #265 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #373 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 1990 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #146 | 1,467 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #225 | 1,529 | 0 | 0 |
| 1991 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #201 | 1,444 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 16–19 | 45.7% | #110 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 |
| 1992 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #159 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #55 | 1,703 | 0 | 1 |
| 1993 | 16–15 | 51.6% | #68 | 1,595 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 25–17 | 59.5% | #51 | 1,759 | 0 | 2 |
| 1994 | 36–23 | 61.0% | #29 | 1,731 | 0 | 0 | 1990 | 22–23 | 48.9% | #70 | 1,691 | 0 | 2 |
| 1995 | 27–25 | 51.9% | #60 | 1,695 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 36–28 | 56.2% | #32 | 1,733 | 0 | 2 |
| 1996 | 21–13 | 61.8% | #66 | 1,769 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 33–32 | 50.8% | #41 | 1,699 | 0 | 2 |
| 1997 | 24–18 | 57.1% | #43 | 1,762 | 0 | 3 | 1993 | 39–31 | 55.7% | #34 | 1,766 | 0 | 2 |
| 1998 | 21–21 | 50.0% | #64 | 1,690 | 0 | 3 | 1994 | 25–33 | 43.1% | #42 | 1,585 | 0 | 3 |
| 1999 | 15–12 | 55.6% | #63 | 1,741 | 0 | 3 | 1995 | 33–32 | 50.8% | #36 | 1,650 | 0 | 3 |
| 2000 | 17–20 | 45.9% | #64 | 1,722 | 0 | 3 | 1996 | 30–33 | 47.6% | #37 | 1,718 | 0 | 4 |
| 2001 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #152 | 1,575 | 0 | 3 | 1997 | 35–33 | 51.5% | #54 | 1,720 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 8–26 | 23.5% | #168 | 1,506 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1999 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #281 | 1,492 | 0 | 4 |
| — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2000 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #957 | 1,481 | 0 | 4 |