H2H data updated: 2026-09-04 00:00 UTC

Stan Wawrinka vs Diego Schwartzman H2H: 1-0

Stan Wawrinka holds a 1–0 lead over Diego Schwartzman in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Stan Wawrinka leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Stan Wawrinka won the 2018 Cincinnati Open first round 6-2 4-6 6-3.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Stan Wawrinka
Switzerland Age 41 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main draw meetings
Diego Schwartzman
Argentina Age 34 Right-Handed 170 cm / 5'7"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Stan Wawrinka #151 6-2 4-6 6-3 Diego Schwartzman #12 Match data Aug 14, 2018* R64 Cincinnati Open Masters 1000 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Stan Wawrinka #127 #3 6,865 2,264 566 376 60.1% 3 1 0 3 9 16
Diego Schwartzman #879 #8 3,765 2,062 240 212 53.1% 0 0 0 1 3 4

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Stan Wawrinka Diego Schwartzman
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2003 2–4 33.3% #171 1,483 0 0 — — — — — — —
19 2004 0–6 0.0% #168 1,420 0 0 — — — — — — —
20 2005 14–14 50.0% #54 1,633 0 0 2013 1–5 16.7% #117 1,587 0 0
21 2006 31–23 57.4% #30 1,867 0 1 2014 2–4 33.3% #61 1,606 0 0
22 2007 21–22 48.8% #36 1,866 0 1 2015 11–20 35.5% #88 1,721 0 0
23 2008 34–21 61.8% #13 1,846 0 1 2016 17–17 50.0% #52 1,781 0 1
24 2009 29–19 60.4% #21 1,875 0 1 2017 38–27 58.5% #26 1,964 0 1
25 2010 35–17 67.3% #21 1,993 0 2 2018 30–25 54.5% #17 1,874 0 2
26 2011 33–19 63.5% #17 1,916 0 3 2019 39–24 61.9% #14 1,953 0 3
27 2012 34–19 64.2% #17 2,017 0 3 2020 24–13 64.9% #9 2,014 0 3
28 2013 49–23 68.1% #8 2,121 0 4 2021 36–20 64.3% #13 1,960 0 4
29 2014 38–16 70.4% #4 2,066 1 7 2022 28–23 54.9% #25 1,801 0 4
30 2015 54–19 74.0% #4 2,215 2 11 2023 13–25 34.2% #114 1,745 0 4
31 2016 46–18 71.9% #4 2,138 3 15 2024 0–8 0.0% #370 1,624 0 4
32 2017 26–11 70.3% #9 2,123 3 16 2025 1–1 50.0% #884 1,631 0 4
33 2018 17–17 50.0% #66 1,949 3 16 — — — — — — —
34 2019 33–20 62.3% #16 2,028 3 16 — — — — — — —
35 2020 15–8 65.2% #18 2,004 3 16 — — — — — — —
36 2021 3–4 42.9% #82 1,938 3 16 — — — — — — —
37 2022 8–14 36.4% #148 1,832 3 16 — — — — — — —
38 2023 24–20 54.5% #49 1,784 3 16 — — — — — — —
39 2024 10–17 37.0% #161 1,718 3 16 — — — — — — —
40 2025 4–13 23.5% #157 1,641 3 16 — — — — — — —
41 2026 6–12 33.3% #127 1,609 3 16 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Stan Wawrinka Diego Schwartzman
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
18 2003 — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2004 0 1 1 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2005 3 6 9 33.3% 10 4 14 71.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2013 — — — — 1 5 6 16.7% — — — — — — — —
21 2006 13 10 23 56.5% 11 7 18 61.1% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 2014 0 1 1 0.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — —
22 2007 16 12 28 57.1% 5 7 12 41.7% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2015 5 6 11 45.5% 6 12 18 33.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
23 2008 17 14 31 54.8% 14 6 20 70.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 2016 8 8 16 50.0% 9 7 16 56.3% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
24 2009 14 11 25 56.0% 12 7 19 63.2% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 2017 21 13 34 61.8% 17 12 29 58.6% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
25 2010 19 11 30 63.3% 16 5 21 76.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2018 12 14 26 46.2% 17 9 26 65.4% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
26 2011 21 10 31 67.7% 11 7 18 61.1% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2019 22 13 35 62.9% 13 9 22 59.1% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — —
27 2012 16 9 25 64.0% 18 8 26 69.2% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2020 9 8 17 52.9% 15 5 20 75.0% — — — — — — — —
28 2013 21 13 34 61.8% 24 8 32 75.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2021 23 12 35 65.7% 11 7 18 61.1% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — —
29 2014 25 11 36 69.4% 6 3 9 66.7% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — 2022 7 10 17 41.2% 20 10 30 66.7% 1 3 4 25.0% — — — —
30 2015 36 13 49 73.5% 13 4 17 76.5% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 2023 7 12 19 36.8% 4 11 15 26.7% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
31 2016 33 12 45 73.3% 12 4 16 75.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2024 0 4 4 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — — — — —
32 2017 14 5 19 73.7% 12 4 16 75.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2025 — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — —
33 2018 14 11 25 56.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2019 23 13 36 63.9% 8 5 13 61.5% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2020 13 6 19 68.4% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2021 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2022 5 8 13 38.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2023 13 12 25 52.0% 9 7 16 56.3% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2024 5 8 13 38.5% 4 8 12 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
40 2025 2 7 9 22.2% 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
41 2026 5 5 10 50.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 331 212 543 61.0% 195 122 317 61.5% 34 35 69 49.3% 6 7 13 46.2% — 114 101 215 53.0% 116 95 211 55.0% 10 16 26 38.5% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 926/942 of Stan Wawrinka's and 448/452 of Diego Schwartzman's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Stan Wawrinka Diego Schwartzman
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
18 2003 6/6 4.0 3.2 63.8% 66.3% 47.0% 66.1% 36.5% 59.3% 37.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
19 2004 6/6 4.3 3.5 56.0% 64.6% 47.3% 54.8% 21.3% 56.7% 32.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
20 2005 27/28 8.2 4.4 56.2% 72.2% 52.0% 62.8% 35.2% 63.4% 37.2% 2013 6/6 1.0 4.2 69.3% 55.0% 45.2% 50.9% 44.7% 52.0% 37.9%
21 2006 54/54 6.0 3.9 55.5% 72.0% 50.9% 58.2% 42.8% 62.6% 37.4% 2014 6/6 0.7 2.2 60.1% 56.8% 50.2% 43.3% 53.9% 53.8% 42.9%
22 2007 43/43 7.0 3.1 56.2% 71.4% 51.4% 59.5% 36.9% 62.5% 36.9% 2015 31/31 2.8 3.2 58.1% 63.7% 50.9% 50.3% 47.1% 58.1% 39.2%
23 2008 53/55 5.9 2.3 60.8% 70.9% 54.5% 51.1% 46.1% 64.2% 40.6% 2016 34/34 2.3 2.4 61.6% 66.6% 50.3% 56.4% 47.8% 60.4% 40.5%
24 2009 47/48 7.0 2.6 57.9% 74.1% 53.5% 66.8% 40.1% 65.2% 39.2% 2017 65/65 2.4 2.4 60.9% 66.5% 52.3% 52.5% 46.6% 61.0% 44.0%
25 2010 52/52 6.9 2.5 57.3% 76.0% 54.7% 71.6% 42.4% 66.8% 39.5% 2018 55/55 3.0 3.3 61.0% 69.0% 50.4% 57.2% 42.9% 61.6% 41.4%
26 2011 52/52 6.2 2.4 60.6% 71.6% 53.8% 58.2% 40.0% 64.5% 38.6% 2019 63/63 2.0 2.9 64.2% 67.5% 51.1% 55.6% 42.9% 61.9% 41.8%
27 2012 52/53 7.7 2.7 56.2% 73.4% 54.2% 66.7% 50.6% 64.9% 38.9% 2020 36/37 1.4 3.1 61.9% 65.9% 49.4% 55.4% 46.4% 59.5% 43.4%
28 2013 71/72 6.9 2.6 59.9% 74.3% 56.2% 63.9% 40.2% 66.9% 38.3% 2021 53/56 1.5 2.8 63.6% 68.1% 51.7% 58.0% 47.1% 62.0% 42.6%
29 2014 51/54 8.6 2.7 56.1% 78.8% 55.5% 62.9% 45.3% 68.6% 38.0% 2022 51/51 1.1 4.0 67.7% 62.7% 48.1% 56.5% 42.6% 58.0% 41.4%
30 2015 72/73 8.0 2.5 56.3% 76.5% 56.2% 66.6% 39.9% 67.4% 36.3% 2023 38/38 1.2 2.5 67.4% 60.5% 46.8% 53.4% 42.8% 56.2% 36.9%
31 2016 64/64 7.1 2.5 58.2% 75.3% 56.9% 68.4% 41.1% 67.6% 38.3% 2024 8/8 1.0 2.9 64.0% 58.3% 41.2% 37.4% 34.0% 51.6% 36.6%
32 2017 37/37 7.1 2.2 59.1% 73.8% 56.4% 62.6% 40.2% 66.7% 36.0% 2025 2/2 2.5 4.0 65.5% 57.0% 47.0% 57.5% 21.0% 53.5% 32.5%
33 2018 34/34 7.4 2.5 59.3% 73.5% 54.1% 57.2% 29.9% 65.6% 33.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2019 52/53 9.8 1.8 58.5% 76.8% 56.0% 66.7% 42.3% 68.2% 35.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2020 23/23 9.8 1.7 59.1% 76.3% 51.8% 65.1% 41.9% 66.2% 36.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2021 6/7 9.8 2.7 57.2% 78.7% 51.9% 67.9% 35.2% 67.4% 34.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2022 22/22 7.6 1.8 55.8% 74.5% 52.1% 65.2% 46.2% 64.3% 31.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
38 2023 44/44 7.8 1.9 56.7% 76.8% 53.4% 62.6% 42.9% 66.6% 35.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
39 2024 25/27 7.5 2.4 55.9% 76.2% 49.5% 60.9% 33.0% 64.7% 32.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
40 2025 15/17 5.9 2.1 55.1% 67.9% 49.5% 43.7% 33.9% 59.6% 35.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
41 2026 18/18 8.9 3.2 57.9% 73.6% 52.9% 57.3% 38.8% 64.2% 33.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 926/942 7.4 2.6 57.7% 74.3% 54.1% 62.8% 40.9% 65.6% 37.2% — 448/452 1.9 3.0 63.1% 65.5% 50.1% 54.7% 44.8% 59.8% 41.4%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Stan Wawrinka Diego Schwartzman
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
18 2003 1484 97.4 -1.62 -1.55 0.927 48.4% — +36 — 38.5% -0.69 0–1 0–2 — +0.70 2011 1498 103.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 2004 1421 107.8 -1.73 -3.43 0.746 44.5% — +50 — 7.7% -2.15 0–1 0–4 (0%) — -0.13 2012 1490 100.3 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
20 2005 1633 131.2 +0.78 +0.37 1.017 50.2% -105 +93 — 48.8% -0.16 6–5 (55%) 8–8 (50%) 102.2 +0.62 2013 1588 128.5 -4.31 +0.42 0.790 45.4% — +70 — 26.7% -1.40 1–2 (33%) 0–1 — +0.04
21 2006 1868 146.2 +0.70 +0.56 1.001 50.1% -72 -59 -316 50.7% +0.22 17–6 (74%) 10–19 (34%) 107.2 -3.52 2014 1607 130.1 -1.60 +2.41 0.927 48.6% — +77 — 37.5% -0.31 0–1 0–1 — -0.40
22 2007 1866 152.0 +0.10 +0.97 0.985 49.9% +22 -86 -397 48.3% +0.07 8–8 (50%) 5–7 (42%) 99.0 -2.17 2015 1721 143.4 -3.91 +2.17 0.937 48.7% -113 +20 — 41.6% -0.44 4–6 (40%) 4–6 (40%) 98.8 -0.75
23 2008 1847 152.7 +1.49 +4.08 1.136 52.3% -27 +57 -235 59.3% +0.61 13–9 (59%) 15–11 (58%) 103.0 +0.04 2016 1782 145.0 -2.62 +3.15 1.022 50.3% -79 +21 — 49.4% +0.03 5–5 (50%) 6–6 (50%) 104.8 -1.35
24 2009 1875 154.2 +2.29 +2.51 1.126 51.9% -14 +13 -151 60.0% +0.61 7–8 (47%) 6–9 (40%) 95.2 +1.74 2017 1965 163.8 -2.03 +6.93 1.127 52.1% -31 -87 — 58.1% +0.60 9–12 (43%) 8–12 (40%) 95.1 +0.94
25 2010 1994 165.4 +3.75 +3.60 1.190 52.7% -11 +33 — 64.1% +0.90 7–4 (64%) 7–12 (37%) 97.7 -1.10 2018 1875 160.3 -1.61 +5.07 1.079 51.3% +2 +85 -361 53.1% +0.36 9–5 (64%) 4–8 (33%) 99.8 +0.44
26 2011 1917 159.1 +2.18 +1.86 1.087 51.2% +94 +71 -264 58.3% +0.49 15–8 (65%) 13–12 (52%) 100.8 +1.40 2019 1954 161.3 -1.81 +5.41 1.097 51.6% -18 +23 -317 58.1% +0.63 15–7 (68%) 13–11 (54%) 104.4 +2.19
27 2012 2017 166.9 +2.86 +2.59 1.109 52.1% +27 +29 — 59.0% +0.82 14–7 (67%) 10–19 (34%) 96.9 -0.31 2020 2014 165.7 -1.69 +5.89 1.071 51.5% -94 +94 — 61.9% +0.76 9–3 (75%) 10–4 (71%) 108.6 -1.52
28 2013 2122 173.6 +4.27 +2.65 1.158 52.3% +22 +65 -417 63.7% +0.87 15–7 (68%) 16–15 (52%) 103.8 -2.10 2021 1960 156.2 -0.65 +5.20 1.122 52.0% -3 +102 -284 63.5% +0.86 8–8 (50%) 7–3 (70%) 100.0 +2.93
29 2014 2067 172.5 +4.62 +2.82 1.210 53.1% +44 +79 -127 65.0% +0.90 6–10 (38%) 20–8 (71%) 98.5 -0.20 2022 1801 148.1 -4.38 +4.65 0.986 49.8% +17 +229 -159 50.0% +0.08 14–5 (74%) 10–12 (45%) 102.0 +2.52
30 2015 2215 173.9 +3.92 +1.92 1.115 52.0% +7 +99 -216 72.4% +0.99 11–8 (58%) 33–12 (73%) 104.4 +0.51 2023 1746 140.4 -5.20 +0.72 0.841 46.7% +19 +97 -91 39.3% -0.67 4–5 (44%) 5–5 (50%) 99.4 -0.53
31 2016 2138 172.3 +4.19 +2.13 1.184 52.8% +43 +135 -184 66.9% +1.04 9–7 (56%) 22–15 (59%) 95.2 +1.48 2024 1624 111.2 -5.97 -0.90 0.755 43.9% +79 +96 — 19.0% -2.57 0–3 (0%) 1–0 — +0.19
32 2017 2123 168.5 +3.10 +0.73 1.081 51.6% +55 +142 — 64.1% +0.72 9–3 (75%) 14–6 (70%) 104.9 -1.03 2025 1631 106.5 -2.61 -2.26 0.699 43.5% — — — 40.0% -1.20 1–0 1–0 — -0.10
33 2018 1949 153.0 +1.77 -1.23 0.985 49.7% +73 +201 -90 52.2% -0.19 4–8 (33%) 13–8 (62%) 94.7 -0.95 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2019 2028 168.4 +4.01 +0.79 1.112 51.6% +42 +114 -199 61.2% +0.61 8–11 (42%) 22–15 (59%) 96.0 -1.93 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2020 2005 154.1 +2.50 +0.39 1.090 51.5% +47 +77 — 56.7% +0.37 7–3 (70%) 6–4 (60%) 100.6 +0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2021 1939 119.2 +0.33 -1.47 1.059 51.2% +46 — — 52.6% +0.42 2–2 (50%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2022 1832 141.6 +1.38 -2.07 0.883 48.4% +63 +190 -60 42.9% -0.38 6–6 (50%) 5–7 (42%) 94.7 -1.59 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2023 1784 145.0 +2.53 -0.13 1.062 51.0% +5 +147 +35 53.1% +0.25 8–6 (57%) 10–16 (38%) 92.5 +0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2024 1719 139.9 -0.08 -2.93 0.911 48.6% +37 +76 — 43.1% -0.21 3–7 (30%) 6–11 (35%) 91.6 -0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
40 2025 1642 129.7 -2.18 -0.78 0.884 47.8% +62 +48 — 33.3% -0.93 2–6 (25%) 5–5 (50%) 95.2 -0.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
41 2026 1609 131.3 +0.42 -0.99 0.940 49.1% +121 0 — 38.5% -0.50 2–3 (40%) 7–9 (44%) 96.6 +0.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2265 167.2 +2.52 +1.39 1.081 51.3% +23 +63 -206 57.8% +0.48 179–144 (55%) 255–236 (52%) 96.0 -0.94 — 2062 158.0 -2.57 +4.47 1.029 50.5% -23 +68 -242 52.9% +0.25 79–62 (56%) 69–69 (50%) 102.1 +1.02

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.