H2H data updated: 2026-09-11 00:00 UTC

Stan Wawrinka vs Dominic Thiem H2H: 3-2

Stan Wawrinka holds a 3–2 lead over Dominic Thiem in their ATP head-to-head. Across 5 main-draw meetings, Stan Wawrinka leads 2–1 on hard courts, while they are tied 1–1 on clay. Most recently, Dominic Thiem won the 2023 Paris Masters first round 3-6 6-3 7-5.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Stan Wawrinka
Switzerland Age 41 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
3 – 2
5 main-draw meetings
Dominic Thiem
AUT Age 33 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Dominic Thiem #108 3-6 6-3 7-5 Stan Wawrinka #51 Match data Nov 1, 2023* R64 Paris Masters Masters 1000 Hard
Stan Wawrinka #3 6-4 4-6 7-6(2) Dominic Thiem #9 Match data Mar 17, 2017* QF Indian Wells Open Masters 1000 Hard
Stan Wawrinka #9 7-6(3) 6-4 Dominic Thiem #49 Match data May 15, 2015* R16 Italian Open Masters 1000 Clay
Stan Wawrinka #4 6-4 7-6(6) Dominic Thiem #37 Match data Oct 30, 2014* R32 Paris Masters Masters 1000 Hard
Dominic Thiem #70 1-6 6-2 6-4 Stan Wawrinka #3 Match data May 7, 2014* R32 Madrid Open Masters 1000 Clay

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Stan Wawrinka #127 #3 6,865 2,264 566 376 60.1% 3 1 0 3 9 16
Dominic Thiem #1,174 #3 9,125 2,240 337 207 61.9% 1 1 0 5 10 17

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Stan Wawrinka Dominic Thiem
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
17 — — — — — — — 2011 1–3 25.0% #638 1,495 0 0
18 2003 2–4 33.3% #171 1,483 0 0 2012 1–2 33.3% #309 1,486 0 0
19 2004 0–6 0.0% #168 1,420 0 0 2013 4–2 66.7% #139 1,580 0 0
20 2005 14–14 50.0% #54 1,633 0 0 2014 22–23 48.9% #39 1,852 0 0
21 2006 31–23 57.4% #30 1,867 0 1 2015 36–26 58.1% #20 1,891 0 3
22 2007 21–22 48.8% #36 1,866 0 1 2016 58–24 70.7% #8 2,005 0 7
23 2008 34–21 61.8% #13 1,846 0 1 2017 47–27 63.5% #5 1,958 0 8
24 2009 29–19 60.4% #21 1,875 0 1 2018 50–21 70.4% #8 2,066 0 11
25 2010 35–17 67.3% #21 1,993 0 2 2019 48–17 73.8% #4 2,143 0 16
26 2011 33–19 63.5% #17 1,916 0 3 2020 24–7 77.4% #3 2,201 1 17
27 2012 34–19 64.2% #17 2,017 0 3 2021 8–8 50.0% #15 2,014 1 17
28 2013 49–23 68.1% #8 2,121 0 4 2022 18–16 52.9% #102 1,907 1 17
29 2014 38–16 70.4% #4 2,066 1 7 2023 19–22 46.3% #98 1,799 1 17
30 2015 54–19 74.0% #4 2,215 2 11 2024 1–9 10.0% #524 1,628 1 17
31 2016 46–18 71.9% #4 2,138 3 15 — — — — — — —
32 2017 26–11 70.3% #9 2,123 3 16 — — — — — — —
33 2018 17–17 50.0% #66 1,949 3 16 — — — — — — —
34 2019 33–20 62.3% #16 2,028 3 16 — — — — — — —
35 2020 15–8 65.2% #18 2,004 3 16 — — — — — — —
36 2021 3–4 42.9% #82 1,938 3 16 — — — — — — —
37 2022 8–14 36.4% #148 1,832 3 16 — — — — — — —
38 2023 24–20 54.5% #49 1,784 3 16 — — — — — — —
39 2024 10–17 37.0% #161 1,718 3 16 — — — — — — —
40 2025 4–13 23.5% #157 1,641 3 16 — — — — — — —
41 2026 6–12 33.3% #127 1,609 3 16 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Stan Wawrinka Dominic Thiem
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1 2 3 33.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
18 2003 — — — — 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2012 1 1 2 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
19 2004 0 1 1 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% — — — — 0 1 1 0.0% 2013 2 1 3 66.7% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — —
20 2005 3 6 9 33.3% 10 4 14 71.4% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2014 10 13 23 43.5% 12 8 20 60.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
21 2006 13 10 23 56.5% 11 7 18 61.1% 2 3 5 40.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 2015 14 16 30 46.7% 20 6 26 76.9% 2 4 6 33.3% — — — —
22 2007 16 12 28 57.1% 5 7 12 41.7% 0 3 3 0.0% — — — — 2016 25 15 40 62.5% 25 7 32 78.1% 8 2 10 80.0% — — — —
23 2008 17 14 31 54.8% 14 6 20 70.0% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 2017 21 19 40 52.5% 22 5 27 81.5% 4 3 7 57.1% — — — —
24 2009 14 11 25 56.0% 12 7 19 63.2% 3 1 4 75.0% — — — — 2018 23 11 34 67.6% 26 8 34 76.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
25 2010 19 11 30 63.3% 16 5 21 76.2% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2019 25 9 34 73.5% 23 7 30 76.7% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
26 2011 21 10 31 67.7% 11 7 18 61.1% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2020 18 5 23 78.3% 6 2 8 75.0% — — — — — — — —
27 2012 16 9 25 64.0% 18 8 26 69.2% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — 2021 4 3 7 57.1% 4 4 8 50.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
28 2013 21 13 34 61.8% 24 8 32 75.0% 4 2 6 66.7% — — — — 2022 11 7 18 61.1% 7 9 16 43.8% — — — — — — — —
29 2014 25 11 36 69.4% 6 3 9 66.7% 7 2 9 77.8% — — — — 2023 6 9 15 40.0% 13 11 24 54.2% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
30 2015 36 13 49 73.5% 13 4 17 76.5% 5 2 7 71.4% — — — — 2024 0 4 4 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — —
31 2016 33 12 45 73.3% 12 4 16 75.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2017 14 5 19 73.7% 12 4 16 75.0% 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2018 14 11 25 56.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2019 23 13 36 63.9% 8 5 13 61.5% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2020 13 6 19 68.4% 2 2 4 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2021 3 4 7 42.9% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2022 5 8 13 38.5% 2 4 6 33.3% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2023 13 12 25 52.0% 9 7 16 56.3% 2 1 3 66.7% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2024 5 8 13 38.5% 4 8 12 33.3% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
40 2025 2 7 9 22.2% 2 6 8 25.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
41 2026 5 5 10 50.0% 1 6 7 14.3% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 331 212 543 61.0% 195 122 317 61.5% 34 35 69 49.3% 6 7 13 46.2% — 161 115 276 58.3% 161 74 235 68.5% 15 18 33 45.5% — — — —

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 926/942 of Stan Wawrinka's and 539/544 of Dominic Thiem's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Stan Wawrinka Dominic Thiem
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
17 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 4/4 4.0 2.8 48.1% 75.6% 37.4% 48.4% 86.1% 55.7% 33.4%
18 2003 6/6 4.0 3.2 63.8% 66.3% 47.0% 66.1% 36.5% 59.3% 37.7% 2012 3/3 5.0 3.0 61.3% 75.2% 45.6% 73.5% 38.9% 63.6% 28.9%
19 2004 6/6 4.3 3.5 56.0% 64.6% 47.3% 54.8% 21.3% 56.7% 32.3% 2013 6/6 5.8 2.5 54.7% 78.5% 62.7% 58.8% 39.6% 70.9% 38.3%
20 2005 27/28 8.2 4.4 56.2% 72.2% 52.0% 62.8% 35.2% 63.4% 37.2% 2014 44/45 4.4 2.9 57.3% 72.6% 50.7% 58.4% 41.6% 62.9% 37.1%
21 2006 54/54 6.0 3.9 55.5% 72.0% 50.9% 58.2% 42.8% 62.6% 37.4% 2015 62/62 5.9 2.3 56.6% 74.8% 56.2% 58.9% 35.8% 66.5% 37.1%
22 2007 43/43 7.0 3.1 56.2% 71.4% 51.4% 59.5% 36.9% 62.5% 36.9% 2016 80/82 5.9 2.9 61.4% 74.3% 54.1% 56.1% 40.5% 66.4% 37.4%
23 2008 53/55 5.9 2.3 60.8% 70.9% 54.5% 51.1% 46.1% 64.2% 40.6% 2017 74/74 6.1 3.1 58.8% 75.2% 52.6% 61.5% 41.3% 65.9% 38.5%
24 2009 47/48 7.0 2.6 57.9% 74.1% 53.5% 66.8% 40.1% 65.2% 39.2% 2018 70/71 7.3 3.5 58.8% 75.9% 53.3% 63.4% 39.3% 66.5% 38.4%
25 2010 52/52 6.9 2.5 57.3% 76.0% 54.7% 71.6% 42.4% 66.8% 39.5% 2019 64/65 4.8 2.1 65.8% 73.6% 56.2% 60.7% 45.4% 67.6% 38.0%
26 2011 52/52 6.2 2.4 60.6% 71.6% 53.8% 58.2% 40.0% 64.5% 38.6% 2020 31/31 7.1 2.8 63.4% 74.0% 53.5% 64.3% 43.8% 66.4% 38.0%
27 2012 52/53 7.7 2.7 56.2% 73.4% 54.2% 66.7% 50.6% 64.9% 38.9% 2021 16/16 4.6 2.6 63.9% 72.8% 54.3% 66.1% 46.9% 66.2% 36.4%
28 2013 71/72 6.9 2.6 59.9% 74.3% 56.2% 63.9% 40.2% 66.9% 38.3% 2022 34/34 4.3 2.2 63.3% 68.8% 52.8% 50.6% 35.6% 63.3% 36.5%
29 2014 51/54 8.6 2.7 56.1% 78.8% 55.5% 62.9% 45.3% 68.6% 38.0% 2023 41/41 5.4 2.9 60.8% 72.2% 52.2% 61.4% 33.1% 64.3% 34.1%
30 2015 72/73 8.0 2.5 56.3% 76.5% 56.2% 66.6% 39.9% 67.4% 36.3% 2024 10/10 5.9 3.3 58.0% 67.4% 53.0% 48.4% 38.6% 61.4% 27.8%
31 2016 64/64 7.1 2.5 58.2% 75.3% 56.9% 68.4% 41.1% 67.6% 38.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
32 2017 37/37 7.1 2.2 59.1% 73.8% 56.4% 62.6% 40.2% 66.7% 36.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
33 2018 34/34 7.4 2.5 59.3% 73.5% 54.1% 57.2% 29.9% 65.6% 33.9% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2019 52/53 9.8 1.8 58.5% 76.8% 56.0% 66.7% 42.3% 68.2% 35.3% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2020 23/23 9.8 1.7 59.1% 76.3% 51.8% 65.1% 41.9% 66.2% 36.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2021 6/7 9.8 2.7 57.2% 78.7% 51.9% 67.9% 35.2% 67.4% 34.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2022 22/22 7.6 1.8 55.8% 74.5% 52.1% 65.2% 46.2% 64.3% 31.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
38 2023 44/44 7.8 1.9 56.7% 76.8% 53.4% 62.6% 42.9% 66.6% 35.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
39 2024 25/27 7.5 2.4 55.9% 76.2% 49.5% 60.9% 33.0% 64.7% 32.2% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
40 2025 15/17 5.9 2.1 55.1% 67.9% 49.5% 43.7% 33.9% 59.6% 35.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
41 2026 18/18 8.9 3.2 57.3% 74.2% 52.3% 57.3% 38.8% 64.2% 33.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 926/942 7.4 2.6 57.7% 74.3% 54.1% 62.8% 40.9% 65.6% 37.2% — 539/544 5.7 2.8 60.4% 73.8% 53.6% 59.6% 40.4% 65.7% 37.2%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics use eligible main-draw results; point statistics use matches with detailed data. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Stan Wawrinka Dominic Thiem
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
16 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1491 101.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1496 112.5 -2.63 -3.33 0.753 45.1% +32 — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.02
18 2003 1484 97.4 -1.62 -1.55 0.927 48.4% — +36 — 38.5% -0.69 0–1 0–2 — +0.70 2012 1487 106.1 +0.37 -3.45 0.794 48.0% — — — 42.9% -0.57 0–1 1–1 — +0.16
19 2004 1421 107.8 -1.73 -3.43 0.746 44.5% — +50 — 7.7% -2.15 0–1 0–4 (0%) — -0.13 2013 1580 124.6 +2.00 -0.38 1.319 54.2% -19 -9 — 64.3% +1.29 1–1 0–1 — +0.35
20 2005 1633 131.2 +0.78 +0.37 1.017 50.2% -105 +93 — 48.8% -0.16 6–5 (55%) 8–8 (50%) 102.2 +0.62 2014 1853 150.8 -0.10 +1.26 1.001 49.9% -30 -16 — 50.0% -0.09 8–8 (50%) 9–6 (60%) 104.7 -1.38
21 2006 1868 146.2 +0.70 +0.56 1.001 50.1% -72 -59 -316 50.7% +0.22 17–6 (74%) 10–19 (34%) 107.2 -3.52 2015 1892 154.0 +1.96 +1.24 1.108 51.3% -65 +157 -301 51.8% +0.13 10–9 (53%) 17–24 (41%) 97.2 +0.34
22 2007 1866 152.0 +0.10 +0.97 0.985 49.9% +22 -86 -397 48.3% +0.07 8–8 (50%) 5–7 (42%) 99.0 -2.17 2016 2006 168.6 +3.18 +1.63 1.114 51.5% -61 +166 -227 63.5% +0.71 21–3 (88%) 20–14 (59%) 118.6 -0.64
23 2008 1847 152.7 +1.49 +4.08 1.136 52.3% -27 +57 -235 59.3% +0.61 13–9 (59%) 15–11 (58%) 103.0 +0.04 2017 1959 167.8 +2.96 +2.51 1.131 52.0% -82 +337 -151 63.7% +0.80 7–12 (37%) 14–14 (50%) 93.6 +0.76
24 2009 1875 154.2 +2.29 +2.51 1.126 51.9% -14 +13 -151 60.0% +0.61 7–8 (47%) 6–9 (40%) 95.2 +1.74 2018 2067 169.1 +3.22 +2.98 1.147 52.2% -45 +195 -279 66.7% +0.99 14–5 (74%) 17–14 (55%) 103.1 +0.03
25 2010 1994 165.4 +3.75 +3.60 1.190 52.7% -11 +33 — 64.1% +0.90 7–4 (64%) 7–12 (37%) 97.7 -1.10 2019 2144 172.9 +3.94 +3.40 1.174 52.5% -34 +136 — 65.6% +0.78 14–3 (82%) 16–12 (57%) 111.2 -1.32
26 2011 1917 159.1 +2.18 +1.86 1.087 51.2% +94 +71 -264 58.3% +0.49 15–8 (65%) 13–12 (52%) 100.8 +1.40 2020 2202 171.1 +4.24 +2.58 1.132 52.4% +10 +19 — 69.1% +1.14 7–3 (70%) 15–9 (63%) 102.9 -2.09
27 2012 2017 166.9 +2.86 +2.59 1.109 52.1% +27 +29 — 59.0% +0.82 14–7 (67%) 10–19 (34%) 96.9 -0.31 2021 2015 141.5 +1.76 +0.56 1.075 51.5% +142 +122 — 52.3% +0.34 4–3 (57%) 4–3 (57%) 97.8 +0.26
28 2013 2122 173.6 +4.27 +2.65 1.158 52.3% +22 +65 -417 63.7% +0.87 15–7 (68%) 16–15 (52%) 103.8 -2.10 2022 1908 145.5 +0.24 +0.10 0.994 49.8% +149 +46 — 47.6% -0.26 10–5 (67%) 14–4 (78%) 103.9 -2.20
29 2014 2067 172.5 +4.62 +2.82 1.210 53.1% +44 +79 -127 65.0% +0.90 6–10 (38%) 20–8 (71%) 98.5 -0.20 2023 1800 137.0 -0.18 -1.41 0.957 49.4% +72 +55 — 47.5% -0.20 8–9 (47%) 10–10 (50%) 96.8 -1.03
30 2015 2215 173.9 +3.92 +1.92 1.115 52.0% +7 +99 -216 72.4% +0.99 11–8 (58%) 33–12 (73%) 104.4 +0.51 2024 1628 110.1 -2.09 -4.22 0.720 45.2% +169 +71 — 19.2% -1.54 1–2 (33%) 1–5 (17%) 94.8 -0.23
31 2016 2138 172.3 +4.19 +2.13 1.184 52.8% +43 +135 -184 66.9% +1.04 9–7 (56%) 22–15 (59%) 95.2 +1.48 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
32 2017 2123 168.5 +3.10 +0.73 1.081 51.6% +55 +142 — 64.1% +0.72 9–3 (75%) 14–6 (70%) 104.9 -1.03 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
33 2018 1949 153.0 +1.77 -1.23 0.985 49.7% +73 +201 -90 52.2% -0.19 4–8 (33%) 13–8 (62%) 94.7 -0.95 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2019 2028 168.4 +4.01 +0.79 1.112 51.6% +42 +114 -199 61.2% +0.61 8–11 (42%) 22–15 (59%) 96.0 -1.93 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2020 2005 154.1 +2.50 +0.39 1.090 51.5% +47 +77 — 56.7% +0.37 7–3 (70%) 6–4 (60%) 100.6 +0.13 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2021 1939 119.2 +0.33 -1.47 1.059 51.2% +46 — — 52.6% +0.42 2–2 (50%) 2–2 (50%) — +0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2022 1832 141.6 +1.38 -2.07 0.883 48.4% +63 +190 -60 42.9% -0.38 6–6 (50%) 5–7 (42%) 94.7 -1.59 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2023 1784 145.0 +2.53 -0.13 1.062 51.0% +5 +147 +35 53.1% +0.25 8–6 (57%) 10–16 (38%) 92.5 +0.05 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2024 1719 139.9 -0.08 -2.93 0.911 48.6% +37 +76 — 43.1% -0.21 3–7 (30%) 6–11 (35%) 91.6 -0.22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
40 2025 1642 129.7 -2.18 -0.78 0.884 47.8% +62 +48 — 33.3% -0.93 2–6 (25%) 5–5 (50%) 95.2 -0.32 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
41 2026 1609 131.3 +0.43 -1.05 0.938 49.1% +121 0 — 38.5% -0.50 2–3 (40%) 7–9 (44%) 96.6 0.00 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2265 167.2 +2.52 +1.39 1.081 51.3% +23 +63 -206 57.8% +0.48 179–144 (55%) 255–236 (52%) 96.0 -0.95 — 2241 165.8 +2.25 +1.56 1.084 51.3% -20 +139 -230 58.6% +0.47 105–65 (62%) 138–117 (54%) 106.3 -1.29

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.