H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC
Stan Wawrinka vs Gilles Simon H2H: 5-3
Stan Wawrinka holds a 5–3 lead over Gilles Simon in their ATP head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Gilles Simon leads 3–2 on hard courts, while Stan Wawrinka leads 3–0 on clay. Most recently, Stan Wawrinka won the 2019 Antwerp quarterfinal 6-3 6-7(6) 6-2.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Switzerland
Age 41
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
5
–
3
8 main draw meetings
FRA
Age 41
Right-Handed
183 cm / 6'0"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 19, 2019* | Antwerp | ATP 250 | QF | Hard | Stan Wawrinka | 6-3 6-7(6) 6-2 | Gilles Simon | Match data |
| Oct 14, 2016* | Shanghai Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Hard | Gilles Simon | 6-4 6-4 | Stan Wawrinka | Match data |
| Apr 15, 2016* | Monte Carlo Masters | Masters 1000 | R16 | Clay | Stan Wawrinka | 6-1 6-2 | Gilles Simon | Match data |
| Jun 2, 2015* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R16 | Clay | Stan Wawrinka | 6-1 6-4 6-2 | Gilles Simon | Match data |
| Oct 8, 2014* | Shanghai Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Gilles Simon | 5-7 7-5 6-4 | Stan Wawrinka | Match data |
| Jun 2, 2012* | Roland Garros | Grand Slam | R32 | Clay | Stan Wawrinka | 7-5 6-7(5) 6-7(3) 6-3 6-2 | Gilles Simon | Match data |
| Mar 13, 2012* | Indian Wells Masters | Masters 1000 | R32 | Hard | Gilles Simon | 6-4 6-4 | Stan Wawrinka | Match data |
| Oct 12, 2010* | Shanghai Masters | Masters 1000 | R64 | Hard | Stan Wawrinka | 6-4 6-1 | Gilles Simon | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stan Wawrinka | #117 | #3 | 6,865 | 2,268 | 564 | 371 | 60.3% | 3 | 1 | 0 | 3 | 9 | 16 |
| Gilles Simon | #464 | #6 | 4,170 | 2,093 | 493 | 379 | 56.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 13 | 14 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Stan Wawrinka | Gilles Simon | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 18 | 2003 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #171 | 1,483 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 19 | 2004 | 0–6 | 0.0% | #168 | 1,421 | 0 | 0 | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #177 | 1,460 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 2005 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #54 | 1,632 | 0 | 0 | 2005 | 6–6 | 50.0% | #124 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 2006 | 31–23 | 57.4% | #30 | 1,867 | 0 | 1 | 2006 | 24–24 | 50.0% | #45 | 1,633 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2007 | 21–22 | 48.8% | #36 | 1,865 | 0 | 1 | 2007 | 35–26 | 57.4% | #29 | 1,783 | 0 | 2 |
| 23 | 2008 | 33–20 | 62.3% | #13 | 1,860 | 0 | 1 | 2008 | 50–26 | 65.8% | #7 | 1,981 | 0 | 5 |
| 24 | 2009 | 29–19 | 60.4% | #21 | 1,875 | 0 | 1 | 2009 | 45–24 | 65.2% | #15 | 1,936 | 0 | 6 |
| 25 | 2010 | 35–17 | 67.3% | #21 | 1,991 | 0 | 2 | 2010 | 22–17 | 56.4% | #41 | 1,930 | 0 | 7 |
| 26 | 2011 | 33–19 | 63.5% | #17 | 1,915 | 0 | 3 | 2011 | 38–25 | 60.3% | #12 | 1,905 | 0 | 9 |
| 27 | 2012 | 34–18 | 65.4% | #17 | 2,018 | 0 | 3 | 2012 | 41–23 | 64.1% | #16 | 1,959 | 0 | 10 |
| 28 | 2013 | 49–23 | 68.1% | #8 | 2,113 | 0 | 4 | 2013 | 36–22 | 62.1% | #19 | 1,926 | 0 | 11 |
| 29 | 2014 | 38–16 | 70.4% | #4 | 2,071 | 1 | 7 | 2014 | 28–25 | 52.8% | #21 | 1,953 | 0 | 11 |
| 30 | 2015 | 54–19 | 74.0% | #4 | 2,199 | 2 | 11 | 2015 | 41–22 | 65.1% | #15 | 1,990 | 0 | 12 |
| 31 | 2016 | 46–18 | 71.9% | #4 | 2,129 | 3 | 15 | 2016 | 30–25 | 54.5% | #25 | 1,937 | 0 | 12 |
| 32 | 2017 | 26–11 | 70.3% | #9 | 2,120 | 3 | 16 | 2017 | 15–25 | 37.5% | #89 | 1,764 | 0 | 12 |
| 33 | 2018 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #66 | 1,946 | 3 | 16 | 2018 | 33–24 | 57.9% | #30 | 1,861 | 0 | 14 |
| 34 | 2019 | 33–20 | 62.3% | #16 | 2,021 | 3 | 16 | 2019 | 27–28 | 49.1% | #55 | 1,773 | 0 | 14 |
| 35 | 2020 | 15–8 | 65.2% | #18 | 2,001 | 3 | 16 | 2020 | 10–12 | 45.5% | #63 | 1,754 | 0 | 14 |
| 36 | 2021 | 3–4 | 42.9% | #82 | 1,916 | 3 | 16 | 2021 | 5–16 | 23.8% | #122 | 1,634 | 0 | 14 |
| 37 | 2022 | 8–14 | 36.4% | #148 | 1,824 | 3 | 16 | 2022 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #143 | 1,707 | 0 | 14 |
| 38 | 2023 | 24–20 | 54.5% | #49 | 1,782 | 3 | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 39 | 2024 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #161 | 1,714 | 3 | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 40 | 2025 | 4–13 | 23.5% | #157 | 1,640 | 3 | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 41 | 2026 | 6–10 | 37.5% | #117 | 1,632 | 3 | 16 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |