H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 02:15 UTC

Stan Wawrinka vs Jurgen Melzer H2H: 2-1

Stan Wawrinka holds a 2–1 lead over Jurgen Melzer in their ATP head-to-head. Across 3 main-draw meetings, Stan Wawrinka leads 2–0 on clay, while Jurgen Melzer leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Jurgen Melzer won the 2012 Wimbledon first round 3-6 7-6(2) 2-6 6-4 8-6.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Stan Wawrinka
Switzerland Age 41 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
2 – 1
3 main draw meetings
Jurgen Melzer
AUT Age 45 Left-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Jun 27, 2012* Wimbledon Grand Slam R128 Grass Jurgen Melzer #35 3-6 7-6(2) 2-6 6-4 8-6 Stan Wawrinka #24 Match data
May 9, 2012* Madrid Masters Masters 1000 R32 Clay Stan Wawrinka #21 6-1 6-4 Jurgen Melzer #33 Match data
Apr 27, 2010* Rome Masters Masters 1000 R64 Clay Stan Wawrinka #26 6-1 6-2 Jurgen Melzer #27 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Stan Wawrinka #117 #3 6,865 2,268 564 371 60.3% 3 1 0 3 9 16
Jurgen Melzer #1,552 #8 3,055 2,024 326 303 51.8% 0 0 0 2 3 5

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Stan Wawrinka Jurgen Melzer
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2003 2–4 33.3% #171 1,483 0 0 1999 1–1 50.0% #491 1,518 0 0
19 2004 0–6 0.0% #168 1,421 0 0 2000 0–3 0.0% #358 1,547 0 0
20 2005 14–14 50.0% #54 1,632 0 0 2001 1–1 50.0% #168 1,550 0 0
21 2006 31–23 57.4% #30 1,867 0 1 2002 10–9 52.6% #91 1,659 0 0
22 2007 21–22 48.8% #36 1,865 0 1 2003 11–18 37.9% #79 1,584 0 0
23 2008 33–20 62.3% #13 1,860 0 1 2004 27–22 55.1% #39 1,769 0 0
24 2009 29–19 60.4% #21 1,875 0 1 2005 24–25 49.0% #52 1,702 0 0
25 2010 35–17 67.3% #21 1,991 0 2 2006 33–25 56.9% #41 1,780 0 1
26 2011 33–19 63.5% #17 1,915 0 3 2007 21–24 46.7% #60 1,695 0 1
27 2012 34–18 65.4% #17 2,018 0 3 2008 26–23 53.1% #34 1,778 0 1
28 2013 49–23 68.1% #8 2,113 0 4 2009 35–26 57.4% #28 1,924 0 2
29 2014 38–16 70.4% #4 2,071 1 7 2010 49–25 66.2% #11 1,998 0 3
30 2015 54–19 74.0% #4 2,199 2 11 2011 20–21 48.8% #33 1,799 0 3
31 2016 46–18 71.9% #4 2,129 3 15 2012 18–22 45.0% #29 1,758 0 4
32 2017 26–11 70.3% #9 2,120 3 16 2013 25–23 52.1% #27 1,825 0 5
33 2018 17–17 50.0% #66 1,946 3 16 2014 12–19 38.7% #113 1,758 0 5
34 2019 33–20 62.3% #16 2,021 3 16 2015 9–11 45.0% #155 1,750 0 5
35 2020 15–8 65.2% #18 2,001 3 16 2016 3–3 50.0% #306 1,770 0 5
36 2021 3–4 42.9% #82 1,916 3 16 2017 0–1 0.0% #186 1,731 0 5
37 2022 8–14 36.4% #148 1,824 3 16 2018 1–1 50.0% #288 1,703 0 5
38 2023 24–20 54.5% #49 1,782 3 16 — — — — — — —
39 2024 9–16 36.0% #161 1,714 3 16 — — — — — — —
40 2025 4–13 23.5% #157 1,640 3 16 — — — — — — —
41 2026 6–10 37.5% #117 1,632 3 16 — — — — — — —