H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC

Stan Wawrinka vs Milos Raonic H2H: 5-3

Stan Wawrinka holds a 5–3 lead over Milos Raonic in their ATP head-to-head. Across 8 main-draw meetings, Stan Wawrinka leads 4–3 on hard courts and 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Stan Wawrinka won the 2019 Rotterdam fourth round 6-4 7-6(4).

Switzerland Age 41 Right-Handed 183 cm / 6'0"
H2H
5 3
8 main draw meetings
CAN Age 35 Right-Handed 196 cm / 6'5"

H2H Match Log

DateTournamentCategoryRoundSurfaceWinnerScoreLoserMatch
Feb 15, 2019* Rotterdam ATP 500 R16 Hard Stan Wawrinka #68 6-4 7-6(4) Milos Raonic #14 Match data
Jan 17, 2019* Australian Open Grand Slam R64 Hard Milos Raonic #17 6-7(4) 7-6(6) 7-6(11) 7-6(5) Stan Wawrinka #59 Match data
Sep 2, 2018* US Open Grand Slam R32 Hard Milos Raonic #24 7-6(6) 6-4 6-3 Stan Wawrinka #156 Match data
Jan 26, 2016* Australian Open Grand Slam R16 Hard Milos Raonic #14 6-4 6-3 5-7 4-6 6-3 Stan Wawrinka #4 Match data
Feb 14, 2015* Rotterdam ATP 500 SF Hard Stan Wawrinka #8 7-6(3) 7-6(7) Milos Raonic #6 Match data
Apr 19, 2014* Monte Carlo Masters Masters 1000 QF Clay Stan Wawrinka #3 7-6(5) 6-2 Milos Raonic #10 Match data
Oct 11, 2013* Shanghai Masters Masters 1000 R16 Hard Stan Wawrinka #8 7-6(2) 6-4 Milos Raonic #11 Match data
Aug 18, 2012* Cincinnati Masters Masters 1000 QF Hard Stan Wawrinka #26 2-6 7-6(5) 6-4 Milos Raonic #19 Match data

* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 Finals 500 250 Titles
Stan Wawrinka #117 #3 6,865 2,268 564 371 60.3% 3 1 0 3 9 16
Milos Raonic #634 #3 5,450 2,246 369 186 66.5% 0 0 0 1 7 8

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Stan Wawrinka Milos Raonic
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
18 2003 2–4 33.3% #171 1,483 0 0 2009 0–1 0.0% #373 1,535 0 0
19 2004 0–6 0.0% #168 1,421 0 0 2010 3–4 42.9% #156 1,651 0 0
20 2005 14–14 50.0% #54 1,632 0 0 2011 30–18 62.5% #31 1,839 0 1
21 2006 31–23 57.4% #30 1,867 0 1 2012 42–20 67.7% #13 1,987 0 3
22 2007 21–22 48.8% #36 1,865 0 1 2013 41–21 66.1% #11 2,034 0 5
23 2008 33–20 62.3% #13 1,860 0 1 2014 47–20 70.1% #8 2,087 0 6
24 2009 29–19 60.4% #21 1,875 0 1 2015 32–15 68.1% #14 2,047 0 7
25 2010 35–17 67.3% #21 1,991 0 2 2016 52–19 73.2% #3 2,143 0 8
26 2011 33–19 63.5% #17 1,915 0 3 2017 29–14 67.4% #24 2,053 0 8
27 2012 34–18 65.4% #17 2,018 0 3 2018 31–18 63.3% #18 1,952 0 8
28 2013 49–23 68.1% #8 2,113 0 4 2019 23–13 63.9% #31 1,919 0 8
29 2014 38–16 70.4% #4 2,071 1 7 2020 23–10 69.7% #14 1,996 0 8
30 2015 54–19 74.0% #4 2,199 2 11 2021 6–4 60.0% #70 1,964 0 8
31 2016 46–18 71.9% #4 2,129 3 15
32 2017 26–11 70.3% #9 2,120 3 16 2023 4–4 50.0% #317 1,909 0 8
33 2018 17–17 50.0% #66 1,946 3 16 2024 6–5 54.5% #238 1,903 0 8
34 2019 33–20 62.3% #16 2,021 3 16
35 2020 15–8 65.2% #18 2,001 3 16
36 2021 3–4 42.9% #82 1,916 3 16
37 2022 8–14 36.4% #148 1,824 3 16
38 2023 24–20 54.5% #49 1,782 3 16
39 2024 9–16 36.0% #161 1,714 3 16
40 2025 4–13 23.5% #157 1,640 3 16
41 2026 6–10 37.5% #117 1,632 3 16