H2H data updated: 2026-09-03 00:00 UTC

Stefan Edberg vs Amos Mansdorf H2H: 10-0

Stefan Edberg holds a 10–0 lead over Amos Mansdorf in their ATP head-to-head. Across 10 main-draw meetings, Stefan Edberg leads 7–0 on hard courts and 3–0 on grass. Most recently, Stefan Edberg won the 1994 Cincinnati Open quarterfinal 5-7 6-4 RET.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Stefan Edberg
SWE Age 60 Right-Handed 188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
10 – 0
10 main draw meetings
Amos Mansdorf
ISR Age 60 Right-Handed 175 cm / 5'9"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Stefan Edberg #4 5-7 6-4 (ret.) Amos Mansdorf #71 Match data Aug 14, 1994* QF Cincinnati Open Masters 1000 Hard
Stefan Edberg #5 7-6(4) 1-6 6-4 Amos Mansdorf #26 Match data Oct 2, 1993* QF Swiss Indoors ATP World Series → modern equivalent ATP 250 Hard
Stefan Edberg #3 6-3 6-4 6-4 Amos Mansdorf #28 Match data Jun 25, 1993* R64 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Stefan Edberg #2 6-3 6-1 1-6 7-6(5) Amos Mansdorf #21 Match data Jan 24, 1993* R32 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard
Stefan Edberg #2 6-4 6-3 Amos Mansdorf #24 Match data Aug 15, 1992* R16 Cincinnati Open Masters 1000 Hard
Stefan Edberg #2 6-1 6-2 Amos Mansdorf #53 Match data Aug 10, 1991* R16 Cincinnati Open Masters 1000 Hard
Stefan Edberg #3 6-4 5-7 3-6 6-2 9-7 Amos Mansdorf #34 Match data Jul 1, 1990* R32 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Stefan Edberg #3 6-2 6-1 Amos Mansdorf #54 Match data Mar 19, 1990* R32 Miami Open Masters 1000 Hard
Stefan Edberg #3 6-4 6-3 6-2 Amos Mansdorf #23 Match data Jul 5, 1989* R16 Wimbledon Grand Slam Grass
Stefan Edberg #4 6-7 6-4 6-1 Amos Mansdorf #26 Match data Mar 11, 1989* SF Scottsdale ATP 250 Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Stefan Edberg #1,347 #1 3,997 2,237 748 248 75.1% 6 4 1 9 21 41
Amos Mansdorf #514 #18 1,184 1,895 290 215 57.4% 0 0 0 1 5 6

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Stefan Edberg Amos Mansdorf
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
15 — — — — — — — 1981 0–1 0.0% — 1,489 0 0
16 1982 0–3 0.0% — 1,463 0 0 — — — — — — —
17 1983 12–10 54.5% #54 1,616 0 0 1983 1–1 50.0% — 1,499 0 0
18 1984 27–18 60.0% #20 1,825 0 1 1984 3–2 60.0% #270 1,531 0 0
19 1985 58–17 77.3% #5 2,130 1 5 1985 15–13 53.6% #84 1,672 0 0
20 1986 66–20 76.7% #5 2,124 1 8 1986 19–17 52.8% #37 1,800 0 1
21 1987 75–12 86.2% #2 2,208 2 15 1987 35–21 62.5% #27 1,805 0 2
22 1988 58–16 78.4% #5 2,077 3 18 1988 33–17 66.0% #26 1,835 0 4
23 1989 58–16 78.4% #3 2,154 3 20 1989 29–19 60.4% #39 1,739 0 4
24 1990 67–13 83.8% #1 2,175 4 27 1990 39–23 62.9% #33 1,828 0 5
25 1991 73–14 83.9% #1 2,147 5 33 1991 21–25 45.7% #62 1,740 0 5
26 1992 64–20 76.2% #2 2,035 6 36 1992 35–27 56.5% #25 1,772 0 5
27 1993 58–22 72.5% #5 1,986 6 37 1993 40–24 62.5% #25 1,780 0 6
28 1994 53–23 69.7% #7 1,873 6 40 1994 20–25 44.4% #69 1,693 0 6
29 1995 35–19 64.8% #23 1,827 6 41 — — — — — — —
30 1996 44–25 63.8% #14 1,887 6 41 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Stefan Edberg Amos Mansdorf
Yr HardClayGrassCarpet Yr HardClayGrassCarpet
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
16 1982 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1983 6 5 11 54.5% 4 2 6 66.7% 2 3 5 40.0% — — — — 1983 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
18 1984 9 5 14 64.3% 5 4 9 55.6% 4 3 7 57.1% 9 6 15 60.0% 1984 3 2 5 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — —
19 1985 25 7 32 78.1% 8 2 10 80.0% 9 1 10 90.0% 16 7 23 69.6% 1985 6 6 12 50.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 5 3 8 62.5% 1 1 2 50.0%
20 1986 32 5 37 86.5% 12 3 15 80.0% 6 2 8 75.0% 16 10 26 61.5% 1986 13 8 21 61.9% 1 4 5 20.0% 2 1 3 66.7% 3 4 7 42.9%
21 1987 42 5 47 89.4% 5 3 8 62.5% 14 2 16 87.5% 14 2 16 87.5% 1987 20 10 30 66.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 5 4 9 55.6% 10 6 16 62.5%
22 1988 28 9 37 75.7% 6 2 8 75.0% 12 1 13 92.3% 12 4 16 75.0% 1988 23 12 35 65.7% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 7 2 9 77.8%
23 1989 29 7 36 80.6% 9 2 11 81.8% 6 2 8 75.0% 14 5 19 73.7% 1989 24 13 37 64.9% 0 1 1 0.0% 3 2 5 60.0% 2 3 5 40.0%
24 1990 39 5 44 88.6% 2 3 5 40.0% 10 1 11 90.9% 16 4 20 80.0% 1990 25 14 39 64.1% 2 3 5 40.0% 7 1 8 87.5% 5 5 10 50.0%
25 1991 39 7 46 84.8% 6 3 9 66.7% 10 1 11 90.9% 18 3 21 85.7% 1991 17 13 30 56.7% 0 3 3 0.0% 4 3 7 57.1% 0 6 6 0.0%
26 1992 32 6 38 84.2% 9 3 12 75.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 16 9 25 64.0% 1992 24 16 40 60.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 3 3 6 50.0% 7 5 12 58.3%
27 1993 24 9 33 72.7% 16 4 20 80.0% 7 2 9 77.8% 11 7 18 61.1% 1993 31 13 44 70.5% 0 2 2 0.0% 1 1 2 50.0% 8 8 16 50.0%
28 1994 31 9 40 77.5% 8 5 13 61.5% 3 2 5 60.0% 11 7 18 61.1% 1994 14 13 27 51.9% 2 5 7 28.6% 2 2 4 50.0% 2 5 7 28.6%
29 1995 26 11 37 70.3% 6 4 10 60.0% 2 2 4 50.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1996 18 12 30 60.0% 14 7 21 66.7% 6 2 8 75.0% 6 4 10 60.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 380 104 484 78.5% 110 48 158 69.6% 98 26 124 79.0% 160 70 230 69.6% — 201 122 323 62.2% 9 26 35 25.7% 35 22 57 61.4% 45 45 90 50.0%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Detailed serve and return statistics available for 392/450 of Stefan Edberg's and 189/217 of Amos Mansdorf's main draw matches. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Stefan Edberg Amos Mansdorf
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
25 1991 77/87 3.0 2.9 63.0% 75.5% 56.0% 60.7% 45.0% 68.3% 43.6% 1991 39/46 3.9 2.3 59.5% 66.9% 47.8% 59.6% 48.7% 59.3% 38.7%
26 1992 75/84 3.5 3.6 63.9% 74.6% 54.9% 64.0% 45.3% 67.4% 40.6% 1992 56/62 4.0 1.9 58.3% 70.7% 54.4% 57.3% 36.5% 64.0% 38.1%
27 1993 63/80 2.9 4.6 60.3% 73.6% 51.0% 59.4% 47.5% 64.4% 42.1% 1993 57/64 3.9 2.2 55.5% 72.7% 55.9% 62.3% 46.1% 65.2% 40.1%
28 1994 62/76 2.8 3.6 62.4% 72.9% 53.8% 61.0% 47.0% 65.7% 41.8% 1994 37/45 3.1 2.3 56.5% 67.7% 51.2% 57.4% 50.7% 60.6% 37.7%
29 1995 52/54 3.0 3.6 61.0% 72.5% 49.2% 60.5% 46.4% 63.6% 41.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
30 1996 63/69 3.9 4.1 59.0% 72.3% 52.5% 58.8% 41.9% 64.0% 41.0% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 392/996 3.2 3.7 61.7% 73.7% 53.2% 60.9% 45.5% 65.8% 41.8% — 189/505 3.8 2.2 57.3% 69.9% 52.9% 59.3% 44.7% 62.7% 38.7%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Stefan Edberg Amos Mansdorf
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
15 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 1981 1489 96.6 — — — — — — — 33.3% -2.33 0–1 — — +0.06
16 1982 1464 96.7 — — — — — — — 25.0% -2.62 0–2 1–0 — +0.35 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
17 1983 1617 133.1 — — — — +5 -20 -83 52.8% +0.21 2–2 (50%) 3–4 (43%) — +0.10 1983 1499 102.6 — — — — — — — 60.0% -0.20 0–1 1–0 — +0.18
18 1984 1826 153.7 — — — — -28 -162 -156 60.9% +0.75 5–7 (42%) 11–11 (50%) — -0.06 1984 1531 104.3 — — — — +32 — — 60.0% 0.00 2–0 1–0 — +0.76
19 1985 2130 166.9 — — — — -89 -335 -173 72.7% +1.45 7–8 (47%) 19–14 (58%) — -3.55 1985 1672 131.3 — — — — -36 -131 -32 52.9% +0.47 5–4 (56%) 3–7 (30%) — +1.17
20 1986 2125 164.5 — — — — +27 -250 -162 69.7% +1.52 18–7 (72%) 19–13 (59%) — -1.90 1986 1800 142.4 — — — — -19 -254 -125 54.7% +0.53 3–6 (33%) 3–6 (33%) — -0.07
21 1987 2209 172.3 — — — — +77 -360 -99 77.7% +1.92 13–3 (81%) 19–16 (54%) — -3.18 1987 1805 142.3 — — — — +11 — -124 59.9% +0.89 10–9 (53%) 7–13 (35%) — +1.76
22 1988 2077 159.9 — — — — +31 -199 +95 72.3% +1.37 14–8 (64%) 16–8 (67%) — -2.31 1988 1836 146.9 — — — — +64 — -174 63.4% +0.67 9–6 (60%) 13–5 (72%) — -0.60
23 1989 2155 169.3 — — — — +39 -186 +7 73.0% +1.25 10–5 (67%) 18–9 (67%) — -6.13 1989 1740 140.4 — — — — +39 — -19 59.0% +0.75 8–5 (62%) 10–8 (56%) — +0.68
24 1990 2176 173.1 — — — — +30 -272 +103 74.5% +1.68 16–1 (94%) 19–10 (66%) — -4.50 1990 1829 146.5 — — — — -3 -306 +23 58.9% +0.65 9–6 (60%) 15–9 (63%) — +0.66
25 1991 2148 168.6 +6.92 +5.37 1.372 55.2% +61 -218 +146 78.7% +1.85 12–7 (63%) 18–9 (67%) — -1.02 1991 1740 143.1 -0.65 +0.28 0.950 49.1% +19 -227 +79 46.1% -0.10 9–7 (56%) 5–13 (28%) — -3.32
26 1992 2036 166.3 +5.64 +3.53 1.246 53.7% +37 -92 +216 68.9% +1.22 17–10 (63%) 29–14 (67%) — +0.13 1992 1772 149.8 +2.43 +0.52 1.057 51.0% +35 -280 +32 54.5% +0.20 10–8 (56%) 15–9 (63%) — -0.40
27 1993 1987 165.8 +3.09 +4.76 1.184 52.9% +16 +31 +233 67.6% +1.11 15–9 (63%) 24–13 (65%) — -2.70 1993 1780 154.3 +3.76 +1.90 1.154 52.7% +32 — — 57.2% +0.79 11–7 (61%) 14–15 (48%) — -0.75
28 1994 1874 159.8 +4.24 +3.69 1.218 53.6% +60 +64 +297 67.4% +1.26 11–10 (52%) 13–11 (54%) — +1.11 1994 1694 129.3 -0.97 -0.68 0.957 49.3% +26 -226 +133 44.0% -0.35 6–5 (55%) 10–9 (53%) — +1.54
29 1995 1827 152.9 +1.63 +3.73 1.143 52.1% +69 +91 +198 60.3% +0.83 12–7 (63%) 13–7 (65%) — +0.90 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
30 1996 1888 152.3 +2.04 +3.83 1.139 52.1% -26 +12 +184 60.6% +0.82 9–9 (50%) 13–17 (43%) — -2.82 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 2237 168.9 +4.15 +4.19 1.222 53.4% +27 -108 +46 69.9% +1.32 161–95 (63%) 235–156 (60%) 102.1 -2.58 — 1895 149.2 +1.53 +0.65 1.039 50.8% +23 -232 -23 55.6% +0.46 82–65 (56%) 97–94 (51%) 101.0 +0.33

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.