H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 14:16 UTC
Stefan Edberg vs Daniel Nestor H2H: 1-0
Stefan Edberg holds a 1–0 lead over Daniel Nestor in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Stefan Edberg leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Stefan Edberg won the 1995 US Open second round 6-1 7-6(4) 2-6 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
SWE
Age 60
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CAN
Age 53
Left-Handed
191 cm / 6'3"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 1, 1995* | US Open | Grand Slam | R64 | Hard | Stefan Edberg | 6-1 7-6(4) 2-6 6-1 | Daniel Nestor | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stefan Edberg | #1,347 | #1 | 3,997 | 2,233 | 744 | 246 | 75.2% | 6 | 5 | 1 | 0 | 29 | 41 |
| Daniel Nestor | #1,106 | #58 | 752 | 1,737 | 69 | 101 | 40.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Stefan Edberg | Daniel Nestor | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 16 | 1982 | 0–3 | 0.0% | — | 1,463 | 0 | 0 | 1989 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #823 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 |
| 17 | 1983 | 12–10 | 54.5% | #54 | 1,616 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1984 | 27–18 | 60.0% | #20 | 1,823 | 0 | 1 | 1991 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #242 | 1,481 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1985 | 58–17 | 77.3% | #5 | 2,129 | 1 | 5 | 1992 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #238 | 1,468 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1986 | 66–20 | 76.7% | #5 | 2,121 | 1 | 8 | 1993 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #189 | 1,485 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1987 | 75–12 | 86.2% | #2 | 2,206 | 2 | 15 | 1994 | 5–5 | 50.0% | #171 | 1,556 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1988 | 54–15 | 78.3% | #5 | 2,080 | 3 | 18 | 1995 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #177 | 1,589 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1989 | 58–16 | 78.4% | #3 | 2,149 | 3 | 20 | 1996 | 11–12 | 47.8% | #112 | 1,653 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1990 | 67–13 | 83.8% | #1 | 2,172 | 4 | 27 | 1997 | 9–17 | 34.6% | #107 | 1,596 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1991 | 73–14 | 83.9% | #1 | 2,146 | 5 | 33 | 1998 | 11–17 | 39.3% | #106 | 1,597 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1992 | 64–19 | 77.1% | #2 | 2,044 | 6 | 36 | 1999 | 18–16 | 52.9% | #86 | 1,672 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1993 | 58–22 | 72.5% | #5 | 1,986 | 6 | 37 | 2000 | 4–8 | 33.3% | #220 | 1,599 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1994 | 53–23 | 69.7% | #7 | 1,854 | 6 | 40 | 2001 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #219 | 1,649 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 1995 | 35–19 | 64.8% | #23 | 1,823 | 6 | 41 | 2002 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #659 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 1996 | 44–25 | 63.8% | #14 | 1,890 | 6 | 41 | 2003 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #500 | 1,623 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2004 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1062 | 1,612 | 0 | 0 |
| 33 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #1115 | 1,606 | 0 | 0 |