H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 02:15 UTC
Stefano Pescosolido vs Grant Connell H2H: 0-1
Grant Connell holds a 1–0 lead over Stefano Pescosolido in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Grant Connell leads 1–0 on grass. Most recently, Grant Connell won the 1994 Wimbledon first round 6-4 6-4 6-4.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 55
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
CAN
Age 60
Left-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 22, 1994* | Wimbledon | Grand Slam | R128 | Grass | Grant Connell | 6-4 6-4 6-4 | Stefano Pescosolido | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stefano Pescosolido | #1,500 | #42 | 781 | 1,763 | 107 | 155 | 40.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Grant Connell | #1,367 | #67 | 517 | 1,754 | 66 | 96 | 40.7% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Stefano Pescosolido | Grant Connell | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #739 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | 1989 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #225 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 1984 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #555 | 1,497 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1990 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #141 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #570 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1991 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #65 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | 1992 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #62 | 1,592 | 0 | 1 | 1987 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #123 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1993 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,734 | 0 | 2 | 1988 | 9–16 | 36.0% | #134 | 1,517 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1994 | 17–25 | 40.5% | #113 | 1,621 | 0 | 2 | 1989 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #94 | 1,586 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | 1995 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #68 | 1,702 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 19–21 | 47.5% | #92 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 1996 | 13–24 | 35.1% | #136 | 1,592 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 20–21 | 48.8% | #79 | 1,665 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 1997 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #228 | 1,568 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 8–16 | 33.3% | #186 | 1,572 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 1998 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #183 | 1,573 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #946 | 1,561 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 1999 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #193 | 1,588 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #318 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1995 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #713 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 32 | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #130 | 1,461 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2004 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #233 | 1,467 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |