H2H data updated: 2026-07-20 02:15 UTC
Stefano Pescosolido vs Leonardo Lavalle H2H: 0-1
Leonardo Lavalle holds a 1–0 lead over Stefano Pescosolido in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Leonardo Lavalle leads 1–0 on clay. Most recently, Leonardo Lavalle won the 1989 Rome second round 6-4 6-1.
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
ITA
Age 55
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
0
–
1
1 main draw meetings
MEX
Age 59
Left-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 17, 1989* | Rome | Masters 1000 | R64 | Clay | Leonardo Lavalle | 6-4 6-1 | Stefano Pescosolido | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stefano Pescosolido | #1,500 | #42 | 781 | 1,763 | 107 | 155 | 40.8% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Leonardo Lavalle | #968 | #51 | 483 | 1,728 | 60 | 96 | 38.5% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Stefano Pescosolido | Leonardo Lavalle | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 17 | 1988 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #739 | 1,491 | 0 | 0 | 1985 | 4–5 | 44.4% | #87 | 1,559 | 0 | 0 |
| 18 | 1989 | 2–5 | 28.6% | #225 | 1,482 | 0 | 0 | 1986 | 10–17 | 37.0% | #105 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 |
| 19 | 1990 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #141 | 1,479 | 0 | 0 | 1987 | 2–9 | 18.2% | #224 | 1,531 | 0 | 0 |
| 20 | 1991 | 10–16 | 38.5% | #65 | 1,537 | 0 | 0 | 1988 | 9–7 | 56.2% | #64 | 1,659 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | 1992 | 21–26 | 44.7% | #62 | 1,592 | 0 | 1 | 1989 | 11–15 | 42.3% | #132 | 1,645 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 1993 | 14–14 | 50.0% | #59 | 1,734 | 0 | 2 | 1990 | 5–9 | 35.7% | #183 | 1,593 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | 1994 | 17–25 | 40.5% | #113 | 1,621 | 0 | 2 | 1991 | 5–3 | 62.5% | #133 | 1,656 | 0 | 1 |
| 24 | 1995 | 20–17 | 54.1% | #68 | 1,702 | 0 | 2 | 1992 | 7–15 | 31.8% | #99 | 1,600 | 0 | 1 |
| 25 | 1996 | 13–24 | 35.1% | #136 | 1,592 | 0 | 2 | 1993 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #309 | 1,569 | 0 | 1 |
| 26 | 1997 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #228 | 1,568 | 0 | 2 | 1994 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #213 | 1,543 | 0 | 1 |
| 27 | 1998 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #183 | 1,573 | 0 | 2 | 1995 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #362 | 1,543 | 0 | 1 |
| 28 | 1999 | 2–2 | 50.0% | #193 | 1,588 | 0 | 2 | 1996 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #313 | 1,550 | 0 | 1 |
| 29 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1997 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #439 | 1,542 | 0 | 1 |
| 30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1998 | 1–1 | 50.0% | #400 | 1,552 | 0 | 1 |
| 32 | 2003 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #130 | 1,461 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 33 | 2004 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #233 | 1,467 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |