H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 07:16 UTC
Stefano Travaglia vs Henri Laaksonen H2H: 1-0
Stefano Travaglia holds a 1–0 lead over Henri Laaksonen in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Stefano Travaglia leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Stefano Travaglia won the 2022 Marseille third round 6-2 6-7(5) 7-6(1).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
Italy
Age 34
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
SUI
Age 34
Right-Handed
185 cm / 6'1"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 17, 2022* | Marseille | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Stefano Travaglia | 6-2 6-7(5) 7-6(1) | Henri Laaksonen | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stefano Travaglia | #150 | #60 | 1,039 | 1,806 | 29 | 56 | 34.1% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| Henri Laaksonen | #1,622 | #84 | 798 | 1,830 | 37 | 64 | 36.6% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Age | Stefano Travaglia | Henri Laaksonen | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | |
| 20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2012 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #291 | 1,506 | 0 | 0 |
| 21 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2013 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #244 | 1,600 | 0 | 0 |
| 22 | 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #198 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 | 2014 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #318 | 1,554 | 0 | 0 |
| 23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2015 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #181 | 1,551 | 0 | 0 |
| 24 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | 2016 | 2–4 | 33.3% | #136 | 1,592 | 0 | 0 |
| 25 | 2017 | 1–3 | 25.0% | #134 | 1,653 | 0 | 0 | 2017 | 10–10 | 50.0% | #121 | 1,691 | 0 | 0 |
| 26 | 2018 | 3–7 | 30.0% | #133 | 1,680 | 0 | 0 | 2018 | 5–4 | 55.6% | #169 | 1,643 | 0 | 0 |
| 27 | 2019 | 5–7 | 41.7% | #84 | 1,682 | 0 | 0 | 2019 | 6–8 | 42.9% | #104 | 1,655 | 0 | 0 |
| 28 | 2020 | 4–9 | 30.8% | #74 | 1,696 | 0 | 0 | 2020 | 1–5 | 16.7% | #134 | 1,660 | 0 | 0 |
| 29 | 2021 | 11–20 | 35.5% | #78 | 1,621 | 0 | 0 | 2021 | 7–8 | 46.7% | #98 | 1,790 | 0 | 0 |
| 30 | 2022 | 3–6 | 33.3% | #310 | 1,512 | 0 | 0 | 2022 | 3–14 | 17.6% | #172 | 1,543 | 0 | 0 |
| 31 | 2023 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #193 | 1,588 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 34 | 2026 | 2–1 | 66.7% | #150 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |