H2H data updated: 2026-09-06 00:00 UTC

Stephane Robert vs Michal Przysiezny H2H: 1-0

Stephane Robert holds a 1–0 lead over Michal Przysiezny in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Stephane Robert leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Stephane Robert won the 2014 Australian Open second round 7-6(3) 6-1 6-7(3) 6-1.

Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.

Stephane Robert
FRA Age 46 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"
H2H
1 – 0
1 main-draw meetings
Michal Przysiezny
POL Age 42 Right-Handed 185 cm / 6'1"

H2H Match Log

PlayerScorePlayerMatch DataDateRoundTournamentCategorySurface
Stephane Robert #119 7-6(3) 6-1 6-7(3) 6-1 Michal Przysiezny #64 Match data Jan 16, 2014* R64 Australian Open Grand Slam Hard

Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable. Arrows show an edition's recorded category and documented modern equivalent; unresolved editions keep their recorded category. Asterisked totals include editions mapped from documented historical predecessor categories. Mapping details.

Career Comparison

Player Current Peak Pts Elo W L Win % GS 1000 including documented historical predecessor categories Finals 500 including documented historical predecessor categories 250 including documented historical predecessor categories Titles
Stephane Robert #1,486 #50 926 1,839 38 75 33.6% 0 0 0 0 0 0
Michal Przysiezny #1,346 #57 810 1,783 19 59 24.4% 0 0 0 0 0 0

Career Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.

Age Stephane Robert Michal Przysiezny
YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles YrW-LWin %RankEloGSTitles
20 — — — — — — — 2004 0–2 0.0% #339 1,478 0 0
22 — — — — — — — 2006 2–2 50.0% #257 1,506 0 0
23 — — — — — — — 2007 1–3 25.0% #256 1,540 0 0
24 2004 1–2 33.3% #203 1,502 0 0 2008 0–3 0.0% #609 1,513 0 0
25 — — — — — — — 2009 0–1 0.0% #183 1,516 0 0
26 — — — — — — — 2010 1–12 7.7% #86 1,430 0 0
27 — — — — — — — 2011 1–4 20.0% #306 1,440 0 0
29 — — — — — — — 2013 10–11 47.6% #66 1,775 0 0
30 2010 11–17 39.3% #122 1,562 0 0 2014 4–18 18.2% #174 1,660 0 0
31 2011 2–5 28.6% #105 1,595 0 0 2015 0–2 0.0% #193 1,667 0 0
32 2012 0–3 0.0% #273 1,549 0 0 2016 0–1 0.0% #428 1,656 0 0
33 2013 2–2 50.0% #115 1,678 0 0 — — — — — — —
34 2014 5–8 38.5% #134 1,683 0 0 — — — — — — —
35 2015 1–6 14.3% #208 1,675 0 0 — — — — — — —
36 2016 14–18 43.8% #54 1,741 0 0 — — — — — — —
37 2017 1–11 8.3% #218 1,610 0 0 — — — — — — —
38 2018 1–2 33.3% #195 1,565 0 0 — — — — — — —
40 2020 0–1 0.0% #898 1,508 0 0 — — — — — — —

Surface Results by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Results cover completed main-draw matches. Bold green marks the higher win percentage when both players have at least 5 matches on that surface at the aligned age.

Age Stephane Robert Michal Przysiezny
Yr HardClayGrass Yr HardClayGrass
W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win % W L M Win %
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 — — — — 0 2 2 0.0% — — — —
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 — — — — 2 2 4 50.0% — — — —
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 0 1 1 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — —
24 2004 — — — — 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — 2008 — — — — 0 3 3 0.0% — — — —
25 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — —
26 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 0 6 6 0.0% 0 4 4 0.0% 1 2 3 33.3%
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — —
29 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 6 8 14 42.9% 1 1 2 50.0% 3 2 5 60.0%
30 2010 7 6 13 53.8% 3 9 12 25.0% 1 2 3 33.3% 2014 4 11 15 26.7% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 3 3 0.0%
31 2011 1 4 5 20.0% 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 2015 0 2 2 0.0% — — — — — — — —
32 2012 0 2 2 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 2016 — — — — — — — — 0 1 1 0.0%
33 2013 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2014 4 4 8 50.0% 1 3 4 25.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2015 0 2 2 0.0% 1 4 5 20.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2016 7 11 18 38.9% 6 5 11 54.5% 1 2 3 33.3% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2017 1 6 7 14.3% 0 4 4 0.0% 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2018 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — 1 1 2 50.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — —
40 2020 0 1 1 0.0% — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 21 38 59 35.6% 13 29 42 31.0% 4 8 12 33.3% — 11 33 44 25.0% 4 18 22 18.2% 4 8 12 33.3%

Performance Progression by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Sample is shown as matches with detailed serve and return statistics / total main draw matches. Bold green marks the stronger value when both stat samples contain at least 5 matches; lower is better for DFs/M.

Age Stephane Robert Michal Przysiezny
Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts% Yr Sample Aces/M DFs/M 1st Sv% 1st Pts% 2nd Pts% BP Saved% BP Conv% Svc Pts% Ret Pts%
20 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2004 2/2 2.0 1.5 57.9% 68.1% 40.4% 47.8% 65.0% 56.8% 33.7%
22 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2006 4/4 2.0 2.0 56.7% 61.0% 53.4% 47.7% 33.8% 57.3% 42.3%
23 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2007 4/4 6.8 4.8 59.0% 68.4% 40.8% 60.0% 34.4% 56.7% 36.4%
24 2004 3/3 2.0 1.7 55.0% 66.6% 50.0% 68.1% 39.4% 59.5% 46.0% 2008 3/3 5.0 3.0 57.2% 63.7% 44.9% 52.2% 9.5% 55.6% 28.6%
25 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2009 1/1 9.0 1.0 59.4% 71.9% 56.4% 57.1% 66.7% 65.6% 27.8%
26 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2010 13/13 7.8 4.9 55.7% 72.2% 44.7% 54.0% 43.2% 60.4% 27.7%
27 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2011 5/5 6.8 2.8 54.2% 71.1% 53.3% 49.0% 35.0% 63.1% 35.6%
29 — —/— — — — — — — — — — 2013 21/21 8.5 3.2 59.7% 76.4% 50.5% 60.5% 45.2% 65.7% 31.2%
30 2010 28/28 2.3 3.3 56.0% 65.2% 48.3% 56.3% 45.5% 57.8% 38.0% 2014 22/22 8.3 3.8 60.0% 70.5% 47.5% 54.6% 36.5% 61.3% 31.4%
31 2011 7/7 2.9 3.6 48.3% 71.0% 43.0% 45.7% 27.0% 56.6% 29.8% 2015 2/2 6.5 4.0 52.0% 73.6% 44.1% 47.9% 15.0% 59.2% 29.5%
32 2012 3/3 1.7 4.3 45.5% 73.1% 26.4% 37.5% 24.4% 45.7% 28.6% 2016 1/1 2.0 6.0 48.8% 79.5% 43.9% 75.0% 33.3% 61.3% 29.0%
33 2013 4/4 5.0 3.8 60.2% 72.8% 51.0% 61.1% 26.9% 64.3% 39.4% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
34 2014 13/13 5.8 5.6 52.8% 74.0% 51.3% 58.2% 44.2% 63.2% 35.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
35 2015 7/7 4.1 4.0 51.1% 64.0% 43.1% 47.4% 40.9% 54.0% 35.7% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
36 2016 32/32 4.7 4.4 52.9% 70.9% 46.4% 53.9% 42.4% 59.2% 38.6% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
37 2017 12/12 3.3 6.3 45.3% 64.7% 42.1% 45.0% 33.3% 52.5% 31.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
38 2018 3/3 7.3 5.0 47.9% 76.8% 49.1% 59.0% 43.2% 62.4% 35.5% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
40 2020 1/1 8.0 3.0 57.3% 65.5% 34.1% 72.2% 42.9% 52.1% 31.8% — —/— — — — — — — — — —
Career — 113/113 3.9 4.3 52.5% 68.9% 46.2% 53.6% 40.3% 58.0% 36.5% — 78/78 7.4 3.6 58.1% 71.7% 47.9% 55.5% 39.1% 61.7% 31.6%

Advanced Statistics Comparison by Age

Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. Metrics are precomputed from eligible main-draw results; point-stat values use the available detailed sample. Bold green marks the stronger value when both underlying samples are sufficient. Lower is better for Schedule because a negative value means a tougher schedule. Career Schedule is normalized per 100 matches.

Age Stephane Robert Michal Przysiezny
Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule Yr Elo P+ Serve+ Return+ PD TPW% Hard Elo Clay Elo Grass Elo Set Win % Set Margin Dec. Set Tiebreak Pressure+ Schedule
20 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2004 1478 104.1 -0.13 -2.62 0.778 44.6% — — — 0.0% -2.00 — — — +0.03
22 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2006 1507 110.8 +0.85 -1.37 0.993 50.1% — +39 — 42.9% -0.14 0–1 1–0 — -0.09
23 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2007 1541 111.9 -0.66 -0.96 0.841 47.0% — +24 — 33.3% -1.42 1–1 0–1 — -0.33
24 2004 1502 113.1 -0.56 +1.66 1.136 52.2% — +38 — 37.5% 0.00 0–1 0–1 — +0.15 2008 1514 102.9 -0.59 -3.68 0.644 43.1% — +58 — 0.0% -3.00 — — — -0.18
25 2005 1491 98.4 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2009 1517 108.0 +0.26 -4.12 0.808 47.3% — — — 33.3% -0.67 0–1 — — +0.10
26 2006 1498 100.8 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2010 1431 114.5 -2.53 -4.94 0.699 45.0% +3 +75 +146 24.2% -1.30 0–4 (0%) 1–7 (13%) 91.5 -0.12
27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2011 1440 111.8 -1.03 -2.02 0.965 50.0% +12 — — 30.8% -0.61 0–1 1–1 — +0.44
28 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2012 1489 104.5 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
29 2009 1505 105.9 — — — — — — — — — — — — — 2013 1776 134.8 +1.94 -2.48 0.909 49.2% -91 — -65 43.6% -0.42 5–3 (63%) 5–6 (45%) 105.3 +0.18
30 2010 1563 123.8 -4.18 +1.30 0.902 48.1% +31 -61 -12 44.4% -0.65 2–7 (22%) 7–4 (64%) 97.3 +0.80 2014 1660 121.7 -1.71 -4.21 0.811 46.8% +17 -131 -26 31.0% -1.26 3–6 (33%) 8–7 (53%) 97.5 +0.21
31 2011 1596 114.7 -2.10 -2.94 0.688 43.1% -34 — — 30.0% -1.80 1–0 1–0 — +0.17 2015 1668 119.8 -0.92 -3.23 0.723 44.6% — — — 20.0% -2.00 0–1 0–1 — -0.07
32 2012 1549 106.9 -2.55 -2.24 0.527 38.6% — — — 0.0% -4.00 — 0–1 — -0.33 2016 1656 105.5 -4.72 -0.33 0.748 46.3% — — — 0.0% -1.50 — 0–1 — +0.02
33 2013 1678 113.7 +0.89 +0.43 1.106 51.3% — — — 50.0% +0.09 — 1–0 — +0.27 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
34 2014 1683 130.6 -0.55 -0.24 0.970 49.7% +60 -66 — 46.2% -0.18 1–3 (25%) 6–5 (55%) 98.9 +0.62 2018 1633 98.2 — — — — — — — — — — — — —
35 2015 1675 118.7 -4.37 -0.64 0.776 44.9% — -9 — 26.3% -1.63 0–2 1–1 — -0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
36 2016 1742 136.7 -2.92 +1.63 0.945 48.7% -50 +82 -62 40.7% -0.56 6–2 (75%) 4–9 (31%) 102.0 +0.53 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
37 2017 1610 125.8 -6.08 -1.36 0.669 42.5% +15 +126 — 14.3% -2.71 0–2 0–1 — -1.46 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
38 2018 1566 103.0 -1.88 -1.73 0.945 48.9% — — — 44.4% -0.11 — 1–1 — +0.07 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
39 2019 1519 96.7 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
40 2020 1508 104.1 -2.82 -0.46 0.664 43.8% — — — 33.3% -1.33 0–1 — — +0.17 — — — — — — — — — — — — — — — —
Career — 1839 127.3 -3.10 +0.34 0.868 47.3% -2 +12 -37 37.6% -0.92 10–18 (36%) 21–23 (48%) 95.8 +0.73 — 1783 122.9 -0.54 -3.28 0.825 47.3% -24 +10 +3 31.8% -1.04 9–18 (33%) 16–24 (40%) 93.1 +0.24

Career Rivalries

Each player's five most-played main-draw opponents. The current matchup is highlighted when it appears in a player's top five.