H2H data updated: 2026-07-18 19:16 UTC
Steve Darcis vs Ze Zhang H2H: 1-0
Steve Darcis holds a 1–0 lead over Ze Zhang in their ATP head-to-head. Across 1 main-draw meeting, Steve Darcis leads 1–0 on hard courts. Most recently, Steve Darcis won the 2017 Shenzhen third round 7-5 7-6(3).
Want to explore more matchups? Advanced rivalry search lets you browse current and historical rivalries, unbeaten records, or every matchup for a player.
BEL
Age 42
Right-Handed
178 cm / 5'10"
H2H
1
–
0
1 main draw meetings
CHN
Right-Handed
188 cm / 6'2"
H2H Match Log
| Date | Tournament | Category | Round | Surface | Winner | Score | Loser | Match |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 28, 2017* | Shenzhen | ATP 250 | R32 | Hard | Steve Darcis | 7-5 7-6(3) | Ze Zhang | Match data |
* Estimated match date where the exact historical date is unavailable.
Career Comparison
| Player | Current | Peak | Pts | Elo | W | L | Win % | GS | 1000 | Finals | 500 | 250 | Titles |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Steve Darcis | #756 | #38 | 1,362 | 1,832 | 92 | 122 | 43.0% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 2 |
| Ze Zhang | #1,385 | #148 | 374 | 1,586 | 5 | 23 | 17.9% | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Career Progression by Age
Seasons are aligned by the age each player spent most of that calendar year. GS and Titles are cumulative career totals through that season.
| Steve Darcis | Ze Zhang | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles | Yr | W-L | Win % | Rank | Elo | GS | Titles |
| 2006 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #483 | 1,472 | 0 | 0 | 2010 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #315 | 1,473 | 0 | 0 |
| 2007 | 6–2 | 75.0% | #86 | 1,667 | 0 | 1 | 2011 | 1–2 | 33.3% | #292 | 1,509 | 0 | 0 |
| 2008 | 20–19 | 51.3% | #61 | 1,772 | 0 | 2 | 2012 | 3–3 | 50.0% | #158 | 1,571 | 0 | 0 |
| 2009 | 5–18 | 21.7% | #122 | 1,564 | 0 | 2 | 2013 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #254 | 1,522 | 0 | 0 |
| 2010 | 4–6 | 40.0% | #109 | 1,685 | 0 | 2 | 2014 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #185 | 1,550 | 0 | 0 |
| 2011 | 7–6 | 53.8% | #88 | 1,796 | 0 | 2 | 2015 | 1–4 | 20.0% | #189 | 1,540 | 0 | 0 |
| 2012 | 17–17 | 50.0% | #93 | 1,756 | 0 | 2 | 2016 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #201 | 1,508 | 0 | 0 |
| 2013 | 2–7 | 22.2% | #164 | 1,678 | 0 | 2 | 2017 | 0–3 | 0.0% | #192 | 1,496 | 0 | 0 |
| 2014 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #160 | 1,676 | 0 | 2 | 2018 | 0–1 | 0.0% | #208 | 1,478 | 0 | 0 |
| 2015 | 8–11 | 42.1% | #86 | 1,729 | 0 | 2 | 2019 | 0–2 | 0.0% | #356 | 1,499 | 0 | 0 |
| 2016 | 3–5 | 37.5% | #86 | 1,761 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2017 | 16–18 | 47.1% | #77 | 1,799 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 2019 | 4–11 | 26.7% | #157 | 1,664 | 0 | 2 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |